Topic: Uniswap vs Chainlink (Read 161 times)
Both Uniswap (UNI) and Chainlink (LINK) are best at his own position but there is one thing that both of them are on Ethereum bolckchain and both of them dependent on ETH if ethereum show any positive changes after that uni and link will show positive changes in his price and if ethereum doesn't show any positive changes then these will also not show any kind of changes because all of them dependent on Ethereum
Uniswap and chainlink does worth to invest. But which one is with a better performance?
Chainlink and uniswap are two different unique projects on different path that were created to solve different things.
Chainlink is an oracle project that provide real time information from blockchain to blockchain where as uniswap is an exchange, not just an exchange but decentralized one swapping Erc20 tokens on Ethereum network.
Chainlink need uniswap for swapping into other tokens and uniswap needed Chainlink for API real price as oracle.
I personally will choose uniswap over chainlink, uni is still undervalued and chainlink is overvalued right now.
UNI is a governance token that will have so many utility on uniswap. I like the product of uniswap and this token can give you some benefits when you were holding this.
Chainlink is good enough but the product can't be adopted by all of parties in the crypto ecosystem.
UNI is a governance token that will have so many utility on uniswap. I like the product of uniswap and this token can give you some benefits when you were holding this.
Chainlink is good enough but the product can't be adopted by all of parties in the crypto ecosystem.
Both these are good projects for the long term so it will be better to invest in both. Nobody knows for sure which one is going to perform better than the other.
Uniswap and chainlink does worth to invest. But which one is with a better performance?
In my opinion, UNI is more active than Chainlink. The existence of the Swap system with the UniSwap platform had a positive impact on UNI. And of course every time the UniSwap platform is developed, it will increase the users of the platform. Currently, UniSwap is developed to the V3 platform at a lower cost than V2.
Uniswap and chainlink does worth to invest. But which one is with a better performance?
In terms of performance, UNI is still better than LINK, but in potential and market enthusiasts, it seems that these two tokens both have a lot of interest and are not bad to have in the long run. 
Chainlink surely has the better performance than Uni but right now it is too late to invest. The price surges more than 10000% since last year and if you invest Chainlink, x2 is the most possible.
Why dont you invest in smaller coins. Top 300 probably brings you more profit than top 30.
Why dont you invest in smaller coins. Top 300 probably brings you more profit than top 30.
if you compare Uniswap with Pancakeswap / Bakkeryswap / or for example with Sushiswap.
maybe it is much easier to explain when you compare it with Chainlink I think it will be the opposite. oh yeah, the requirement to compare one another is to look for similar units based on the same value.
maybe it is much easier to explain when you compare it with Chainlink I think it will be the opposite. oh yeah, the requirement to compare one another is to look for similar units based on the same value.
Uniswap and chainlink does worth to invest. But which one is with a better performance?
Until the Ethereum fees problem is not fixed, I will choose ChainLink, Because Uniswap is using the Ethereum Network which is one of the highest transaction fees in the market today for me it's not wise at all. It is a costly platform that's why I better go for BSC which is much cheaper and faster but it is not on the choices that's why I will pick Chainlink for good. that's my opinion about it.
Uniswap and chainlink does worth to invest. But which one is with a better performance?
UNISwap and chainlink two both decentralized Finance projects (DeFI) but uniswap is the exchange support swap based exchange and chainlink a oracle based decentralized Finance project. Uniswap and chainlink does worth to invest. But which one is with a better performance?
Uniswap is DEX and ChainLink is Oracles. Both have different cases, if you want to compare, try to study the two tokens first.Both are good tokens, by the way.
with such of service from developer, trader and investors to gains with benefit on exchange with the less on expends to gains with the dedicated token on request, as more to follows with different tasks on evaluation with the terms of trading as the use with customs on offers might work on all times as length of investment periode.
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 4133
eXch.cx - Automatic crypto Swap Exchange.
They're two different project and shouldn't be compared. It'll be stupid doing so just as it was years back comparing bitcoin with Ethereum when as an enthusiast you should have secured both bags.
They're still new so definitely they have higher possibilities of giving huge return. I believe both project has potential to cross the $100 trading price mark and currently they're trading below $50 which should be a 50% plus percentage increase if that milestone if $100 was to be reached before the years ends.
Chainlink though might achieve this milestone before Uniswap does but that doesn't mean the other isn't a quality project. Uniswap has major development incoming so you should pay close attention to it, with launching of new version, project always experience an instant hype and surge in price.
They're still new so definitely they have higher possibilities of giving huge return. I believe both project has potential to cross the $100 trading price mark and currently they're trading below $50 which should be a 50% plus percentage increase if that milestone if $100 was to be reached before the years ends.
Chainlink though might achieve this milestone before Uniswap does but that doesn't mean the other isn't a quality project. Uniswap has major development incoming so you should pay close attention to it, with launching of new version, project always experience an instant hype and surge in price.
Currently, Link has more volume and less circulating supply than Uniswap (means more liquid). There are also forks of Uniswap, such as PancakeSwap on BSC. I think it's bad since it will dilute Uniswap's value, since BSC is also a competing chain. Not a financial advice though, DYOR & DWYOR.
Why not split it 50:50 then? You should diversify your portfolio even if your money is limited. In case one project fails you won't lose all of your money, and in case one of them fly to the moon you don't miss the gain. Even if you only have $100, I still suggest you to split it.
these two are not competitors, they are actually complementary projects, Uniswap would be hardly possible without oracles provided by Chainlink or similar off-chain data provider
both are here to stay, IMO, but you should do your own analysis prior to investment
Uniswap just launched version v3, and this is a rather good step for their future, but they are getting closer to institutional investment and far from retail, since one will have to be active LP, to maximize their profit with new LP methodology, and that does not seem to be for retail investors with few $k, it is for people that have millions in LP pools
Yes, I know. But if my budget is limited, I can only buy one of them. Then, I have to make a choose between them. both are here to stay, IMO, but you should do your own analysis prior to investment
Uniswap just launched version v3, and this is a rather good step for their future, but they are getting closer to institutional investment and far from retail, since one will have to be active LP, to maximize their profit with new LP methodology, and that does not seem to be for retail investors with few $k, it is for people that have millions in LP pools
these two are not competitors, they are actually complementary projects, Uniswap would be hardly possible without oracles provided by Chainlink or similar off-chain data provider
both are here to stay, IMO, but you should do your own analysis prior to investment
Uniswap just launched version v3, and this is a rather good step for their future, but they are getting closer to institutional investment and far from retail, since one will have to be active LP, to maximize their profit with new LP methodology, and that does not seem to be for retail investors with few $k, it is for people that have millions in LP pools
both are here to stay, IMO, but you should do your own analysis prior to investment
Uniswap just launched version v3, and this is a rather good step for their future, but they are getting closer to institutional investment and far from retail, since one will have to be active LP, to maximize their profit with new LP methodology, and that does not seem to be for retail investors with few $k, it is for people that have millions in LP pools
recently both of them have major upgrade . Uniswap with UniV3 which probably near zero fee when u trading , i am quite sure this upgrade will boost the UNI token, and chainlink with chainlink whitepaper 2.0 the next Decentralized Oracle Networks .For me , i choose chainlink. u know what ? chainlink still have a lot potential , like Chainlink Proof of Reserve supplies on-chain data feeds that enable smart contracts to perform on-demand audits of tokenized asset reserves, such as for stablecoins like TUSD and PAX and cross-chain tokens.
TBH you are making a wrong comparison dude. You are creating a comparison between orange and apple.
Chainlink was working on the decentralized oracle while uniswap was a decentralized swap service.
In this case, I personally will try to pick uniswap consider I like how it was creating a new version of UNISWAP. Chainlink already released a new whitepaper and this project is a very good project as well.
I will pick both if I can.
Thank you for your advice. I know that both of them are good for investment. But my money is limited. I have to choose one-off them. Chainlink was working on the decentralized oracle while uniswap was a decentralized swap service.
In this case, I personally will try to pick uniswap consider I like how it was creating a new version of UNISWAP. Chainlink already released a new whitepaper and this project is a very good project as well.
I will pick both if I can.
TBH you are making a wrong comparison dude. You are creating a comparison between orange and apple.
Chainlink was working on the decentralized oracle while uniswap was a decentralized swap service.
In this case, I personally will try to pick uniswap consider I like how it was creating a new version of UNISWAP. Chainlink already released a new whitepaper and this project is a very good project as well.
I will pick both if I can.
Chainlink was working on the decentralized oracle while uniswap was a decentralized swap service.
In this case, I personally will try to pick uniswap consider I like how it was creating a new version of UNISWAP. Chainlink already released a new whitepaper and this project is a very good project as well.
I will pick both if I can.
Jump to: