Topic: Universal Basic Income - page 2. (Read 1263 times)

Even so the inflation is a problem which basic income cannot support unless it raises periodically, with bitcoin this could be avoided or even reduced, less taxes and more support to real innovation.
The basic income should be global, and instead of giving resources to the poor help them develop tech to exploit their own resources.

Yeah  - can you imagine the stampede into countries with a basic income?

I personally like the idea but feel that its only good for countries where the population is under control. Instead of providing basic income, the government can also consider providing basic necessities, which I believe would satisfy the same goal.

The labour chanceller, John Macdonnell also supported Chavez while he was looting Venezuela. The chances that he will come to power and be allowed to do anything are slim to none.

The Victorians coined the terms the "deserving poor" and the "undeserving poor", to differentiate between those that deserved help in their hour of misfortune and those who brought it upon themselves.

Today, for the most part, we are living in times that only recognises the "undeserving poor" as a reality ie. those that are poor because they are lazy, because they haven't saved for their old age/sickness, they haven't worked at achieving an adequate standard of education etc.
This is an ideological belief, as its used to maintain an exploitative domination.
Anyone would think we lived in a meritocracy  
The deserving poor we sanctimoniously declare to be exclusively found in the 3rd world, Africa and those sorts of places. The places we help to keep poor. The ones that are drowning as we speak trying to get to Europe. They, perhaps, deserve our help - but not too much.

One of the interesting things Muhammad Ali aspired to was a situation whereby blacks could be granted their own land within the US. The more I think about it the more this makes sense - only I believe it should apply to all the disposessed, not just the black community. As Ali put it, if you don't own your own land and resources you are in no position to provide for yourself and so are, by necessity, forced into the humiliation of going back to your overlords with cap in hand.
This is the position of those today claiming unemployment benefits.Meanwhile, in my country, one half of all the land is owned by around 500 people. Being as the nations population is circa 5 million, that 500 constitute around 0.01% of the total population. A meritocracy, you say ? When the land is owned by the same 21 families it was 200 years ago ?

The truth that is staring us in the face, that dare not speak its own name - that there is nowhere near enough work to go around, there hasn't been for a long time, and that the situation is only going to get worse - is not on the political agenda at present. Its hush hush.

Instead of humiliating and impoversihing people how about we either give them their own land and resources or give them a Universal Basic Income  that would not only give people a decent life (with choices) but also take away the stigma of, well, existing at all ?

What amount of people are doing a job with a meaning right now?
I mean jobs that wont be replaced by machines - just think about it.

90% of people are probaly living of the work of the 10% - in sciences, economics and everything else.
Unconditional basic income will not change that. The main problem is technical advantage.
As automations goes forward a basic income or rather a free fullfillment of basic human needs is inevitable.

Rule is your parents have had to been born in the country you live and you have had to been living in your country for 21 years..Done your schooling in the country you live..
simple then you are a true citizen of a country..
In my eyes your not a true citizen of a country unless your parents been born there and you stayed there..
Worked on the channel islands Jersey.. For the none natives you have got to have been working there
for 25 years before your classed as a citizen to claim benefits..

I'm in the "work hard, get an equal or better pay"  camp, not saying getting a universal basic pay is bad, but how exactly do you define a universal basic payroll when around the globe there are manual jobs in one country that actually pays alot more than a similar job on the other side on the globe. In addition to that market spending, inflation, price of basic necessities, the basic amount of pay needed to survive in any country is grossly wide. Even given the same conditions in a same country, a family might be able to survive on let's say 500 usd, another would probably did with that same amount, uses of the money is different too

Surely it's been proven time and time again that the more prosperous you become the less kids you have. I don't think an explosion of the current population would be a problem, however every single human being outside countries with UBI is going to do anything possible to pile in.

40K we need in this day and age we turn everyone to middle class there is no poor no more..
Remember 40k wont buy you a house with a swimming pool..I KNOW IT WOULD WORK..
People can still go and earn more so they can try and end up with a 6 bed house with a swimming pool..
40k your not rich at all so people still will want to be rich and who can you complain to you got 40k and blew it your fault..Masses will feel no sorrow for you..But you get 40k next year and every year till your dead..No need for loads of building for social security plus the workers who tell you your not getting your job seekers today will be gone no need for them more money saved..

IF WE THINK IT CAN BE DONE..Everyone is now the middle class the middle class spend the most..
Money will be flowing around..BUT and it's a big BUT..We need to keep the population from exploding
And one way is to have breeding cycles and if you don't keep to it your child when reaches an adult wont get the money..
If no population check.. If everyone can have 40k the population will explode not good for the planet
So there must be a breeding law to get the 40k.. like you can only have 2 to 3 children who will get the 40k no more..Every 2 years the breeding year comes in and if you have a child in those 2 years your child gets the money when reach 21..For 40k how many will stick to the rules?..
Not to worry if your having trouble having a child we would take that into account..You would have medical proof..I.E some one who been trying for 10 years and is trying so hard to have a child
no breeding cycle rule for these people..

Ouch it's floored just thought what if contraceptive pill don't work some time they don't and poor child wont get nowt..

only give 2 children the 40k keeps the population down..

Drug addiction most likely won't let people pursuing science and creativity (most UBI proponents dream that with free money people will do it).
I don't mean some medical brain-enhancement drugs, but heroin and methamphetamine certainly lead to degradation of the person.

So you mean that drugs don´t let you have children but it makes you live longer?
With such inflation and all the money pissed in wars and bad things i see no reason for not doing this. Besides why such eagerness to become more and more? Shouldn´t we first learn to become autosustainable?

Free money for doing fuck all? I love the sound of that. Count me in and I promise not be any more of a lazy degenerate than I am already.

Absolutely absurd! After 50 years this country will be entirely filled with pensioners because you just have offered strongest birth rate decreasing method ever possible to create.
It must be opposite - pay for children under 25, pay nothing and tax heavily childless adults.

I am not a religious man. But I know many people for whom changing sexual partners is like drugs. They spend a lot of time on these activities instead of doing something useful.

So lust should be exclusive for people with money? And whay the hell it had to do with multiple sexual partners? Sounds like you some religion fanatic.
Ps: https://steemit.com/basicincome/@dantheman/basic-income-must-be-global-or-it-will-fail

Basic income will lead to degradation of the majority population. Drinking, drugs, multiple sexual partners, gambling what will be and not the "society of creators" that UBI supporters dream!
Swiss are smart enough to understand this!

The Labour Shadow Chancellor has just fielded the idea.
We all know that there isn't nearly enough jobs to go around as it is - and with further automation, robots, the information age etc it is going to become way worse.

The Universal Basic Income is starting to look like a very good idea.



Eleven Reasons to Support Basic Income:-

1) Basic Income will help us rethink how & why we work

2) Basic Income will contribute to better working conditions

3) Basic Income will downsize bureaucracy

4) Basic income will make benefit fraud obsolete

5) Basic income will help reducing inequalities

6) It will provide a more secure and substantial safety net for all people

7) Basic Income will contribute to less working hours and better distribution of jobs

8 ) Basic Income will reward unpaid contributions

9) Basic Income will strengthen our Democracy

10) Basic Income is a fair redistribution of technological advancement

11) Basic Income will end extreme financial poverty

Basic Income UK


Switzerland have just rejected it at a referendum - I suppose its a pretty radical upheaval to the welfare system, and its early days (reminds me a little of bitcoin, in that sense).

What do you think ?