Topic: Unlimited starbucks giftcards (personal use only) [$10] - page 3. (Read 3638 times)

bumpitity bump

It has to work. Maybe not "unlimited" but it's so simple and so obvious people do it all the time without even realizing it with many establishments.  I was in TGI Fridays and got a free entre' (legitimately) doing this.  My 90 old father has done it dozens of times over the years (legitimately). This has been going on since food establishments were first "invented."  If you read the method you'd do a headslap. 

Definitely. $10 is a little bit too expensive for this time-consuming method, and the rewards aren't that appealing (as stated by stex2009). Not to mention that this method is probably obtainable for free on some forum as written by reviews above. It'd be great if the person who receives the vouch copy can post some proof that this method indeed works as described.

Thanks for the review Sandy doesn't seem worth the effort or the cost..

bump

I got a free copy, here's my review:

The method is nothing special (again), but can give you a GC (smaller amount), or, maybe a couple of times. Not worth my time, but I will try one time to see what I get tomorrow. This is not a scam, but asking $10, may be a little pricey. I am not a judge of pricing, as for some it may be worth a lot more. Good luck!

LOL.  Didn't want to requote your entire message but having actually read the "method" I must say you are 1000000% totally INCORRECT on what he is doing (not that what he is doing is anything spectacular) but you aren't even in the ballpark .....  or within 1000 miles of it.  

I am not suggesting anyone buy or don't buy this item but you are waaaaaaay off.  Anyone with 1/2 or maybe even 1/4 a brain could figure out the entire method from just reading his OP and applying a bit of logic.

Lets see if I can save someone else from this money sucking scamming prick.

Heres the info

Usually, the transfer of funds from one Starbucks giftcard to another is very straightforward: a user logs into a personal account on starbucks.com, and can then buy gift cards, check their balance, or send funds between different cards.

But a guy found that by trying to transfer $5 simultaneously from two different browsers, Starbucks actually generated additional credit.

After five failed efforts, "the sixth request created two $5 transfers from wallet1 with [a] $5 balance. Now we have 2 cards with $15 and $5 ($20 in total)," This guy wrote. "Now we need a proof of concept, otherwise Starbucks guys can claim there’s no bug or it might be some cache issue."

To prove that the method worked, this guy went to a Starbucks shop and successfully used the cards to purchase bottles of water, a sandwich and some coffee.

THAT IS IT ! ! !

But what this piece of shit WONT tell you is this .....

Update: "Like all major retailers, Starbucks has safeguards in place to constantly monitor for fraudulent activity," a Starbucks spokesperson told Motherboard. "After this individual reported he was able to commit fraudulent activity against Starbucks, we put safeguards in place to prevent replication.

SAVE YOUR MONEY ! ! !

If the method can be found by anyone, or what just sandy as mentioned.

You should re think your price point to be some what reasonable?

I definitely wouldn't waste my time in this, but if you guys are, you could make a lot of money selling the gift cards.

Thanks for the vouch

OK .. I have received about 6 PM's asking me my opinion about this method so rather then sending 6 replies I will put it here.
Despite my stating in my post I did NOT want a vouch, a copy was sent to me.  Thanks.

I assume it will work (personally I wouldn't use it because it's not worth my time and energy). At $10, way too expensive because it can probably be found elsewhere for free and is quite an obvious method that probably can be done with virtually any restaurant type of company. Not sure I'd say it is "unlimited" because eventually you'd fall asleep from boredom doing it.

The seller is definitely not selling a scam but it is overpriced at $10.  It is something that would be quite obvious and most people have probably already used it under real circumstances.  Yes very simple SE'ing is involved.  The "method" is for real but whether it is something "special" is questionable.

Lol.

This cunt is a chancer selling shite he finds on the internet . Needs money badly and will sting you the 1st chance he gets

AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID AVOID

Great, waiting for vouch reviews, i hope this will really be useful and help to earn some bitcoin.

No more vouches I already sent it to 3 legendaries waiting for reviews

can i take a vouch ? i will review it , it is same or not  with mine https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14411717
im curious ,

same term with mine method.

This is a private method.

No purchase involved

LMAO  , i got this method for free on some forum , still works until now ( the last comment on that thread )

share it or no ?  


edit : last comment on that thread 1days ago