If it isn't substantially higher, there won't be one, and the network/coin will die if its not changed. Honestly, the hash on the network right now sucks for a SHA256 coin. It's not exactly secure like the page states.
well, the coinex-incident is still felt and was very unfortunate, BUT uno has a rising hashrate since the mid of july if you look at the chart here:
http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency/coins/unobtaniumthe hashrate was declining during the coinex-dumping.
Uno will need some more time to fully recover from the coinex-dump.
Things can shift upwards pretty quick now that the dumping of stolen coins is over. I'd recommend to stay positive.
We've seen the hashrate double in a day (october 8th)
I think there is longterm not too much to worry. Uno is still recovering from coinex-dumping.
Uno is up a whooping 30% to 40% in the last 30 days - and stable. I think it is looking ok.
(hasrate is up 80% from yesterday currently - if you filter out the volatility you get a steady rise since mid-july)
I'm positive and holding, but this is something we need to start thinking about and we need to keep an eye on the hash carefully over the next few months. The sad fact is that if the price doesn't rise, we might have to consider other options like a low % proof of stake, just to keep the network functioning.
I know I know, no one likes to hear that, but.... If we move UNO to maybe .1% or even less PoS a year when there is still 50k coins left to be mined, we can keep the total under 250k for a LONG time, keep the blockchain running smoothly and securely, and give us non-miner UNO enthusiasts a reward for holding more. Just food for thought at this point.