Topic: 'Unprecedented' rise in deaths from terrorism - page 2. (Read 1175 times)
OK, thanks. I see so much that I need to check and then I forget it but this your post is in a word document now and glaring at me from the desktop so I´ll get to it.
But it´s the state that decides what´s legal or not. For example I don´t see what´s legal about sending drones here and there around the world wiping out weddings and funerals and more. Nor do I see anything legal about invading countries on totally false pretenses and then leaving them in ruins for terrorism to fester in.
The greatest thing that the American government has done to further its abilities to do anything that it wants is, they have made the people forget the difference between legal and lawful. All the people think that they are bound by legal, when according to the basic, foundational documents that keep the government in place, the people are not under legal, but only under lawful.
If the people understood lawful, they could stop paying income tax, and the government would collapse, and they could file claims against government people rather than their governmental offices, and sue the pants off these crooks so that they would be out of office.
Why don't I do something like this? Because I am only finding out, myself... it has been that well hidden by government and their lawyers.
Well, that´s just a great point, BADecker. Legal and lawful. Form vs. substance. Feel free to post more on that by all means.
I have posted this many times. Here it is again. It's a long learn. Start with these 10 Youtube videos, especially the last one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D.
Then look at the first two videos in the group on the right side of this page http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Karl-Lentz.html.
Then listen to numbers 01 and 02 at the bottom of this page http://recordings.talkshoe.com/rss127469.xml.
Next, DuckDuckGo and Youtube search on "Karl Lentz common law." Karl says, "It's so simple it's scary."
And below are a load of links to get you started.
Quote
http://www.myprivateaudio.com/Karl-Lentz.html = Angela Stark's Talkshoe.
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5duR4OvEHHxOSdEZhANETw = TrustInAllLaw snippets of Karl's audios.
http://www.broadmind.org/ = Karl's main page.
http://www.unkommonlaw.co.uk/ = Karl's United Kingdom page.
http://www.youtube.com/user/765736/videos?view=0&live_view=500&flow=grid&sort=da = Craig Lynch's snippets page.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D = Ten great Youtube videos, might be the best introduction to Karl.
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=127469&cmd=tc = Karl's Talkshoe site.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iua56K4Mysk = Karl Lentz - The Brian Bonar Incident - YouTube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdHLHWS4gPE = Lentz-Sense - don't be a More~On - YouTube.
Other Info
http://voidjudgments.com/ = The Secret is most judgments are Void on their face and not merely voidable.
http://educationcenter2000.com/Trinsey-v-Paglario.htm = Trinsey v. Pagliaro - Attorneys cannot "speak" in common law trials if the one who is bringing the suit orders it. Holding from Trinsey v. Pagliaro: "An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a witness."
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5duR4OvEHHxOSdEZhANETw = TrustInAllLaw snippets of Karl's audios.
http://www.broadmind.org/ = Karl's main page.
http://www.unkommonlaw.co.uk/ = Karl's United Kingdom page.
http://www.youtube.com/user/765736/videos?view=0&live_view=500&flow=grid&sort=da = Craig Lynch's snippets page.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D = Ten great Youtube videos, might be the best introduction to Karl.
http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=127469&cmd=tc = Karl's Talkshoe site.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iua56K4Mysk = Karl Lentz - The Brian Bonar Incident - YouTube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cdHLHWS4gPE = Lentz-Sense - don't be a More~On - YouTube.
Other Info
http://voidjudgments.com/ = The Secret is most judgments are Void on their face and not merely voidable.
http://educationcenter2000.com/Trinsey-v-Paglario.htm = Trinsey v. Pagliaro - Attorneys cannot "speak" in common law trials if the one who is bringing the suit orders it. Holding from Trinsey v. Pagliaro: "An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a witness."
Last, ask Mike Miller of Calminlaw, or Gus Breton of https://redress4dummies.wordpress.com/ to let you into the Skype Calminlaw group.
But it´s the state that decides what´s legal or not. For example I don´t see what´s legal about sending drones here and there around the world wiping out weddings and funerals and more. Nor do I see anything legal about invading countries on totally false pretenses and then leaving them in ruins for terrorism to fester in.
The greatest thing that the American government has done to further its abilities to do anything that it wants is, they have made the people forget the difference between legal and lawful. All the people think that they are bound by legal, when according to the basic, foundational documents that keep the government in place, the people are not under legal, but only under lawful.
If the people understood lawful, they could stop paying income tax, and the government would collapse, and they could file claims against government people rather than their governmental offices, and sue the pants off these crooks so that they would be out of office.
Why don't I do something like this? Because I am only finding out, myself... it has been that well hidden by government and their lawyers.
Well, that´s just a great point, BADecker. Legal and lawful. Form vs. substance. Feel free to post more on that by all means.
But it´s the state that decides what´s legal or not. For example I don´t see what´s legal about sending drones here and there around the world wiping out weddings and funerals and more. Nor do I see anything legal about invading countries on totally false pretenses and then leaving them in ruins for terrorism to fester in.
The greatest thing that the American government has done to further its abilities to do anything that it wants is, they have made the people forget the difference between legal and lawful. All the people think that they are bound by legal, when according to the basic, foundational documents that keep the government in place, the people are not under legal, but only under lawful.
If the people understood lawful, they could stop paying income tax, and the government would collapse, and they could file claims against government people rather than their governmental offices, and sue the pants off these crooks so that they would be out of office.
Why don't I do something like this? Because I am only finding out, myself... it has been that well hidden by government and their lawyers.
How about keeping people in some gulags on land and sea forever without normal judicial process. Does that sound legal?
Spendulus, But it´s the state that decides what´s legal or not. For example I don´t see what´s legal about sending drones here and there around the world wiping out weddings and funerals and more. Nor do I see anything legal about invading countries on totally false pretenses and then leaving them in ruins for terrorism to fester in.
In America it's things like the Internet and other forms of communication that are only bringing to light the deaths from terrorists - cops and government - that have been going on for decades. There really isn't an increase in America.
'Unprecedented' rise in deaths from terrorism
The number of people killed globally in terrorist attacks jumped 80 percent last year to the highest level ever recorded, the Institute for Economics and Peace said on Tuesday.
The Global Terrorism Index found that 32,658 people were killed by terrorists in 2014, up from the 18,111 fatalities of the previous year, the largest increase on record.
The study defines terrorism as "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".
Nigeria-based Boko Haram and the Islamic State group were responsible for more than half of the deaths, according to the study, which measures attacks, deaths and damage from terror attacks in 162 countries.
"Terrorism is gaining momentum at an unprecedented pace," said Steve Killelea, the executive chairman of the Institute of Economics and Peace, which produces the study.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11997820/Paris-France-terror-attacks-isil-suspects-Syria-Raqqa-boming-arrests-live.html
Yeah, and "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation" is the exact opposite of course.
The number of people killed globally in terrorist attacks jumped 80 percent last year to the highest level ever recorded, the Institute for Economics and Peace said on Tuesday.
The Global Terrorism Index found that 32,658 people were killed by terrorists in 2014, up from the 18,111 fatalities of the previous year, the largest increase on record.
The study defines terrorism as "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".
Nigeria-based Boko Haram and the Islamic State group were responsible for more than half of the deaths, according to the study, which measures attacks, deaths and damage from terror attacks in 162 countries.
"Terrorism is gaining momentum at an unprecedented pace," said Steve Killelea, the executive chairman of the Institute of Economics and Peace, which produces the study.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11997820/Paris-France-terror-attacks-isil-suspects-Syria-Raqqa-boming-arrests-live.html
Yeah, and "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation" is the exact opposite of course.
Actually, yes it is the exact opposite. You may not like those definitions of the words, but they do seem to be useful. Typically we assign names to things, and verbs to actions, in order to distinguish them and understand them better. Makes sense to me.
'Unprecedented' rise in deaths from terrorism
The number of people killed globally in terrorist attacks jumped 80 percent last year to the highest level ever recorded, the Institute for Economics and Peace said on Tuesday.
The Global Terrorism Index found that 32,658 people were killed by terrorists in 2014, up from the 18,111 fatalities of the previous year, the largest increase on record.
The study defines terrorism as "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".
Nigeria-based Boko Haram and the Islamic State group were responsible for more than half of the deaths, according to the study, which measures attacks, deaths and damage from terror attacks in 162 countries.
"Terrorism is gaining momentum at an unprecedented pace," said Steve Killelea, the executive chairman of the Institute of Economics and Peace, which produces the study.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11997820/Paris-France-terror-attacks-isil-suspects-Syria-Raqqa-boming-arrests-live.html
Yeah, and "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation" is the exact opposite of course.
The number of people killed globally in terrorist attacks jumped 80 percent last year to the highest level ever recorded, the Institute for Economics and Peace said on Tuesday.
The Global Terrorism Index found that 32,658 people were killed by terrorists in 2014, up from the 18,111 fatalities of the previous year, the largest increase on record.
The study defines terrorism as "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a non-state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation".
Nigeria-based Boko Haram and the Islamic State group were responsible for more than half of the deaths, according to the study, which measures attacks, deaths and damage from terror attacks in 162 countries.
"Terrorism is gaining momentum at an unprecedented pace," said Steve Killelea, the executive chairman of the Institute of Economics and Peace, which produces the study.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11997820/Paris-France-terror-attacks-isil-suspects-Syria-Raqqa-boming-arrests-live.html
Yeah, and "the threatened or actual use of illegal force and violence by a state actor to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal through fear, coercion, or intimidation" is the exact opposite of course.
Jump to: