Topic: 🔍 Unveiling Satoshi Nakamoto: Community Vote 🗳️ (Read 619 times)

It looks like he finally game up hahaha! What a fucking loser now selling https://vistomail.com for ¥249,999!!! because nobody cares about Satoshi!! What a failure and scumbag! What a scammer‼️

Surprisingly enough for yet another Satoshi Nakamoto Identity thread I read all
of the OP's post....


TBH OP, with all your hard work I really think you should monetise your findings.
I'm sure you could find someone willing to pay you for something which the majority
of Bitcoiners dont care about.


There is nothing which is a mystery about the origins and motivations behind Bitcoin.

very simple explanations for further research if you want....

Origins: Cypherpunk movement

Motivations: From the Bitcoin Whitepaper

I don't think that the op has truly managed to do something that nobody else managed to do before, including professional investigative journalists. But, in any case, I believe that we must respect Satoshi's right to remain anonymous, Satoshi's privacy. Privacy is among the top values that Bitcoin puts forth, and it's good both for individuals and for BTC's decentralization. If we learn who Satoshi is, it will inevitably alienate some people (because undoubtedly a human being has certain values and opinions that someone else won't appreciate), and it's likely to impact the development of Bitcoin in the future. So it's better not to know and not to dig too deep into it.

You need to get some serious help, and you need to stop using ChatGPT to write texts for you. I don't know if what you're doing is allowed or not here, but it shouldn't be.

Hey there, hardworkinfamilyman! I took a look at your reply, but I didn't watch the video you linked since the chatbot I'm using right now doesn't have the feature to understand YouTube videos. However, I did notice some red flags in your text.

First off, your claim to be the closest to Satoshi Nakamoto is weak sauce. You didn't provide any solid evidence to back it up, and frankly, it's a tired old claim that's been made by many before you.

Then there's the issue of the domains you registered, including vistomail.com, which you claim is connected to Satoshi Nakamoto. But let's be real, the community isn't going to trust someone who's running from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and has been caught lying on many occasions. You need to build trust with the community, and making false claims or avoiding legal issues isn't the way to do it.

And speaking of the SEC, let's not forget that running from them is a terrible idea. If you've done something wrong, face the consequences and make things right. It's the only way to regain the community's trust.

In short, stop making grandiose claims without any evidence, build trust with the community, and deal with your legal issues. It's not rocket science.

But I feel like that many of us wants to vote for yes because all the time, we are always curious and wants to unravel the mysteries about the person behind Bitcoin. And maybe the the research or evidence he have prepared right there are only partial and there are still more to it that he didn't released yet to the public.

To answer your question about the positive effect it can bring to us, well it gives us a sense of contentment and we can now focus clearly on other things. There might other positive effects than this that the whole community can benefit. The challenges that you are talking about are clear and experts are already working on improving them.

Here is your proof: https://youtu.be/afDEEINVzKQ

"Hey everyone, Alex here. Today, I want to focus on the good, but I also need to address the Bitcointalk community. Sitting behind a computer and bashing someone because you're a hero member or have status doesn't make it okay. You never know who's on the other side.

I may or may not be Satoshi Nakamoto, but I am the closest one to Satoshi. I hope you focus on the facts, truth, and proof, and not spin a false narrative from this video.

"I registered vistomail.com, anonymousspeech.com, secureanonymoussurfing.com, websecureemail.com, mailbuddy-tool.com, and virtual-hiv-test.com on the day they became available. These domains have always been under my account, ensuring they remain secure and reliable.
 
"My goal with this video is to target one of my addresses with your miner hash. As Hal Finney would say, 'running Bitcoin,' I can use the rewards to buy eCash, a more promising solution. eCash has not been seized by governments, bought out by corporations, or used for illegal activities. After I buy eCash on the open market, I will then stake it and reset the price back to 1999, like CyberBucks. By doing this, I'll be able to boost eCash's price without disrupting Bitcoin. The reward is that eCash's price will skyrocket with more liquidity, making it more attractive for miners to mine eCash while pumping rewards to the 1 Bitcoin address.

Regarding my SEC issue, my aim was to get caught to understand their process and what they are looking for as an exchange operator and owner. They still have yet to clarify but dance around the questions and say that they can't give legal advice. While I'm out on the battlefield, you trolls can talk about it. But remember, it's the actions and facts that matter.

My intentions are not to fight. If we all work together, I promise the projects I get involved in will outperform anything you have ever seen. I just need help from you.

Now that you know 1% of my real life, I would like to involve you in the other 99% awesome part of it.

Thanks for watching, and please subscribe. If this works out I will start posting my Ideas and concepts and become a more professional Youtuber.

Craig also used ChatGPT in his forgeries tho, so it is indeed something out of his playbook.

And what exactly are you trying to prove with these receipts?


Instead of turning to ChatGPT for wisdom, you should ask your buddy CSW how to forge a document. He is an expert in that field. Just dont expect to win any court cases with them. Hahaha!

I have, but it seems you're unwilling to understand. Please review the metadata indicating the PDF is directly downloaded from the GoDaddy Dashboard, confirming it has not been altered. We can provide additional receipts upon request.

You can view the receipts here:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/9lzu6cgdldj3ck0s3a2l5/vistomail-2006.pdf?rlkey=d98qwhruo826ienkysjxjymbw&st=ni5emrb0&dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/0b1njt83y0d6zmolls6y1/vistomail-2008.pdf?rlkey=q6vvtcgz2w57rp84put4xpt28&st=t2uddzeg&dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/rwf5afp9t75v8shut2q4y/secureanonymoussurfing.pdf?rlkey=ogl4gti5y1utlr5qj7l3ound7&st=bk3oc0zt&dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/i69dvlysyhwbo5r8zecmb/Anonymousspeech.com?rlkey=vpti31kiqs00awxmu7e9r1lfs&st=7mda0bv9&dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/0l5w653dio3tz4euz3fya/3.pdf?rlkey=y5mbkq84s8l2vaqxtg7i3ln9z&st=i0h0qw6q&dl=0

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/o885giwc9953g6dfqtchg/websecureemail.com?rlkey=bpqyxu6lo1ile8dguw2sq8kvh&st=ifzjma8n&dl=0

To check if a PDF has been altered from its original version, follow these steps:

Metadata Inspection: PDF files contain metadata that can indicate the software used to create or modify them, creation dates, and more. Check this metadata to see if it matches the expected details from the original source.

Digital Signatures: Some PDFs may include digital signatures, which verify the authenticity and integrity of the document. If present, verify the signature to ensure the document has not been altered since it was signed.

Compare Versions: If you have access to the original PDF, compare it visually or using specialized software designed for detecting differences between documents. Look for changes in text, formatting, or content.

Checksums or Hash Values: Compute and compare checksums or hash values (such as MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256) of the original and current PDF files. A change in these values indicates alterations.

Third-Party Tools: Use specialized PDF forensic tools or validators that can analyze the file for signs of tampering or modifications.

By following these methods, you can determine if a PDF has been altered from its original version, ensuring its authenticity and reliability.

Hey "hardworkinfamilyman",

Stop dodging the question and provide concrete evidence to support your claims about Satoshi Nakamoto's identity. Your attempts to change the subject and attack the voting process are not fooling anyone.

The majority of the votes indicate that you are either a scammer or that no one cares about your claims. You have ignored all the arguments and scam accusations made against you, including the fact that the US SEC has caught you raising over one million dollars illegally through unregistered offers and sales of securities to crypto asset investors.

I posted it here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.64258004

No one cares; everyone voted. Please review the results. Perhaps this is a major reason why voting doesn't work for you.

- No one cares - 8 votes (33.3%)
- Scammer - 9 votes (37.5%)
- I don't know - 1 vote (4.2%)

Votes are supposed to provide answers. Your statement, 'I thought you were about to unveil Satoshi Nakamoto,' cannot be justified with a response; instead, I offer you a link."

Why go Off Topic victimizing yourself as if you were a kinder garden kid?  I thought you were just about to unveil Satoshi Nakamoto.  What does Trump and Biden have to do with unveiling his identity?

Its a hell of a lot better than the route you are now attempting to go. Here's why we all know you're full of shit: If you had anything of interest at all to present, you would have opened with that instead of your low-brow PGP party trick. As BlackHatCoiner pointed out, anybody can forge anything, except for a message signed from satoshi's actual PGP key.

You picked the wrong place to try this imbecility -- you should have started at a BSV forum.


Only if you want to continue to waste everyone's time.

Sure, grab some popcorn! Would you like to see signed blocks? Is that what everyone wants? If so, what would you prefer to sign them with or say?

Asking for money, promoting a shitcoin, asking people to mine for you, quoting CSW ( that's the best one yet, Proof by signing is meaningless but a bunch of amateur forgeries are proof?) I'm glued to this thread to see what you're going to come up with next.

Hate to break this to you, but owning a domain name is just controlling a couple lines of txt on some nameservers. You know nothing.

“Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence”, you want the community to believe your story, you will have to show incontrovertible evidence that your claims are true, so it is not the community trying to discredit you, your actions are doing it for yourself.

Also do not stoop so low as to claim you are being bullied, it is not bullying for a person to ask evidence from another one when they make a claim no reasonable person would believe without it.

It's ironic that you say "talk is cheap" when that's all you've been doing throughout this entire thread. You've yet to provide any real proof or evidence to back up your claims, and instead, you're trying to distract us with your "voting" system using hashrate. But let's be real, this is just a front for you to get free Bitcoin.

You keep mentioning numbers and hashrate, but where are the source? You've yet to provide any concrete evidence of the hashrate you claim to have. It's easy to throw around big numbers, but without any proof, it's meaningless.

Talk is cheap; words, words. You can bully me, that's fine, but numbers never lie. So, you can bash me all you want, but people's voices are heard through hash power and numbers. Right now, 60 EH is speaking volumes.

---

Participants first digitally sign their messages to authenticate them. Each participant is represented by a unique address (likely a public key), and the winner of the election is determined by the highest hashrate, indicating significant computational support or influence within the system, which could be akin to a blockchain-based voting or consensus mechanism.