Topic: Up Like Trump - page 70. (Read 572791 times)

I'm don't really care if it's 'a gang' thing, and it never crossed my mind.  The idea would be to demonstrate a theft against a landslide, so it doesn't make much sense unless internal polling shows a genuine landslide near the election.  It's more an act of civil disobedience against a system which is telling us to quietly accept deception and don't make a fuss.

If this election and the psy-ops used by TPTB shows anything it shows how powerful the herd influence is.  Probably the longest prong of the efforts have been to try to convince people that Hillary is popular and Trump is not.  Tough to do when Trump has 20,000 showing up to his numerous rallies while Hillary is lucky to get a couple hundred people show up to the few rallies she does have.  Crazy!  The best the MSM can do is to hide this reality, and they are doing a fairly good job of it.

Win, lose or draw, I don't have any qualms about letting the public and the world know that I was a Trump supporter during the election.  It is, to me, the only possible rational choice this time around and I'm happy to be known to have made it and stood fast (absent some actual meaningful complaint against the guy between now and then.)  Even if Trump does get the presidency and turns out to be terrible, I'll still be confident that I made the only rational choice given the available information.

I don't worry about physical attacks for my 'colors' in part because it is not a big threat in my environment and in part because I am obviously capable of defending myself.  Going forward, even if Hillary gets in moves forward with Obama's embryonic domestic brown-shirt programs, I'm even more happy to be recognized locally as the resistance.  If in the worst case scenario it eventually costs me my property or my life (which I would not completely rule out) then so be it.

Yet you don't have proof she has Assange?

Best forensic accounting has shown at least 150 Billion has gone into the Clinton Foundation.  That buys a lot of Media.  Plus when you look at all the power couples that have one person working at the media and the other is in high political office it is no wonder where the bias comes from.  Trump has expressed dissatisfaction for this system of back room deal making and that is how Washington operates, everybody knows this!  Similar how the oil companies populated gov and intel with their offspring decades ago to keep an eye on their interests and how monsanto hires ex-gov and gets gmo deals that helps the banks and military industrial complex also send their people into government and on and on and on.

     Yeah I think the most funny thing is how the media is desperately trying to tell us what to think and hoping we let them when the evidence is to the contrary.  And nobody has the courage to say RIP Assange when we all know she got him.  Instead she tries to whitewash the hit like she is saving us from Russian hackers.  There is no proof those documents are from a hack.  And it is too vast and clean to be a foreign agency.   Hillary should not blame the Russians when she has not proof and act carelessly for a political fight with Donald and trash the new media in the process.  This shows her bad instinct and judgement again.

Is that you, Vince Neil?   ^

http://mashable.com/2016/10/20/was-vince-neil-at-the-presidential-debate/?utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Mashable+%28Mashable%29&utm_cid=Mash-Prod-RSS-Feedburner-All-Partial&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed#1nvsfUm3nSqu

iam vote and follow
is open program is good about bitcoin
iam use bitcoin iam very sad is the winner president election the future is bad progam about bitcoin

YES!  I agree.

I am not a Trump fan, but he won the debate.

CNN, MSNBC both say Shillary won.....  NOT!

did trump just win this debate but the media is paid to be against it? I mean he was actually not doing a bad job.

With regard to the above ^^^...

Hacking Democracy - The Hack







Hacking Democracy - The Hack

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t75xvZ3osFg

I was conversing with one of my NPR-ish progressive informants recently and stated my position that 'if the election is demonstrably stolen and some other groups who I could have some degree of confidence in stages a coup, I would support it.'

My informant was shocked.  I tried to describe my philosophy which is, in my opinion very rational, but I'm not sure it sunk in.

My philosophy is that if the election is stolen, the 'victors' are thieves.  If a coup is undertaken successfully, the participants are also thieves.  So it is a matter of picking the thief who one considers to have the highest probability of producing a good outcome.  'Good' is subjective and means different things to different people of course.  For my part, 'good' means furthering of the nation in something close to the form that the framer's envisioned.

Indeed, in the case of a coup dealing with a stolen election in a putative Democracy, it is a matter of a thief stealing from another thief.  In a double-negative-ish sort of way it could be the case that a natural non-thief was converted into one by a bad situation.  So, there is more hope for the coup participants who might be OK than for the election subverters who are 'bad' by definition...as I define it at least.

I also pointed out, or tried to, that there are nations in which coups are not all that uncommon in modern times and those who have pulled them off (often the military) have relinquished power as the threats to the nation diminished.  Or as support drained away, or whatever.  From my crude understandings, Turkey is a good example of this.

---

With respect to the election, I'm sensing quite strongly that there is a media psy-op regarding the polls.  The goal is just to provide some cover for an election theft.  Part of what makes me suspicious is that it is what I'd do as a strategy if I were 'evil' (and paid.)  The other part is that even given the massive media efforts to assult Trump and prop up Clinton, it makes not much logical sense that the polls are doing what is reported (for the most broadly reported of them) and it doesn't square with the on-the-ground support which can be seen/sensed through the media smokescreen.

I'm not saying that my senses here are right, but in just about every other part of this campaign my senses, when they have been this solid, have been right on.  The volumes of Wikileaks data, as well as other sources such as PVeritas, have time and time again simply provided fairly bullet-proof confirmation of something I've sensed with a high degree to be the reality.  It's almost spooky.

I'd almost bet money that we'll at one point see leaked confirmation of a polling psy-op as I've described.  The main reason I would not is that I have little confidence that leaks will be common, or even possible, if the Clinton side 'wins'.  It has ever likelihood of being an earth-changing development and a gateway between today's relative mobility (in multiple ways) and a world with is significantly different in this regard.

Some good news for Trump, finally. A few of the opinion polls (IBD/TIPP, Rasmussen Reports, LA Times/USC Tracking) are showing him either tied with Hitlery, or slightly ahead. But worryingly, a few of the polls are showing him trailing even in deep-red states such as Arizona. I won't give much importance to one-off polls. But this seems to have developed into a trend as of now.

According to CNN the O'Keefe undercover video is just "locker room talk" from a "discredited activist". I LOL'd when I heard the crowd chanting in the background at the end of the clip.





‘Sometimes the Crazies Bite’: CNN Shows Undercover Video of Democrats Plotting Trump Protests
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz7GaQYJ3zA

New BOMBSHELL video just released by James O'Keefe on MASS VOTER FRAUD







Rigging the Election - Video II: Mass Voter Fraud

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDc8PVCvfKs


Read more at http://therightscoop.com/watch-new-bombshell-video-just-released-james-okeefe-mass-voter-fraud/.

Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IuJGHuIkzY


Rigging the Election - Video II: Mass Voter Fraud

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDc8PVCvfKs


And more videos to come on James O'Keefe series...

https://twitter.com/@Pveritas_Action
https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII

The average American feels the pain when things become painful. Trump is trying to at least forestall the pain of Americans who are feeling the pain caused by the neocon one-worlders and the things they do.

Billionaire tech investor Peter Thiel, whose Founder’s Fund invested in Bitcoin payment’s startup BitPay, recently gave $1.25 million to Republican candidate for President, Donald Trump, “through a combination of super PAC donations and funds given directly to the campaign.”

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitpay-peter-thiel-trump/