No one really wants a hard fork, its just that there is a possibility of a hard fork when implementing Segwit2x so doesn't mean that the miners, devs or people wants it. This Segwith2x implementation is for the good of Bitcoin itself and with that I am supporting it no matter what because upgrading of a revolutionary modern technology is essential and it is a must.
How do you know that
this "upgrade" is essential? How do you gauge whether it's really an upgrade, or if it will actually degrade the network? If it ends up significantly splitting the network, I don't see how it could possibly be an upgrade.
Whatever happens I will support the original Bitcoin as it is the original and the one and only. But there is still people who will choose to support and pump that forked Bitcoin Gold because they are thinking that they will make a profit out of it, let's always hope for the better improvements of Bitcoin in the next years and let the haters do their jobs in spreading bad vibes.
Don't you see the disconnect in your logic here? You can't support only the original Bitcoin but also support Segwit2x. Bitcoin Gold and Segwit2x have a lot more in common than Bitcoin has with either of them.