Pages:
Author

Topic: UPDATED! alts of confirmation120 (Read 1582 times)

hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 506
Thank satoshi
April 13, 2016, 11:36:17 AM
#25
I am flagpara. Want a message from that acount too?

nope. just a clarification is enough for me. though if you want to, be my guest.
I'd like to. But how do you find an adress you posted on the forum?
The search tool of the forum isn't very specific.

there's no feature feature for that AFAIK. however you can use knightdk's site to find the list of posted addresses.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
April 13, 2016, 11:33:12 AM
#24
I am flagpara. Want a message from that acount too?

nope. just a clarification is enough for me. though if you want to, be my guest.
I'd like to. But how do you find an adress you posted on the forum?
The search tool of the forum isn't very specific.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 506
Thank satoshi
April 13, 2016, 10:57:22 AM
#23
I am flagpara. Want a message from that acount too?

nope. just a clarification is enough for me. though if you want to, be my guest.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
April 13, 2016, 08:09:17 AM
#22
Hello,

First thing first: you could maybe start by warning people by pm before leaving neg trust to them. Maybe they could defend themselves.

Second: Laosai might have been an alt of confirmation120 but the account was sold to me before you tagged it. I bought it a few months ago, it's an alt of the account flagpara. Signed message coming just after.

Quote
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
The new owner of this account is flagpara, Feb 5, 2016
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: 1LyDN6jnwcaWRo13V8rUBjmQ7AYqfqWrpP

IP1/CpCn5cIE1fwk8K72EJZexWeBR+3sVreEHVqlDk2xVQOIqBBTJ74HAyjKfPdPGlCDvUuBw7M3vA5QbzhbqAY=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----

are you saying that flagpara sold you that account or that you are flagpara? the signed message timestamp (Feb 5, 2016) was just two days before you got tagged by lutpin.

I am flagpara. Want a message from that acount too?
vip
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1145
April 12, 2016, 03:02:51 PM
#21
note that I said "might" because it seems like mr.coinstrader and Laosai was sold.
So was Patatas according to my information.
I know who currently holds the account (won't disclose it though, as being told in confidence, maybe the user wants to do that himself),
and I'd say the chances are close to 0 that person is connected to confirmation120.

Is the OP of this this thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12975261 - related to either ones of yous? If Patatas did purchase this account, then it was on November 14, 2015, that he started using it as its new owner given the writing style changed on this day.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 506
Thank satoshi
April 12, 2016, 10:59:21 AM
#20
Hello,

First thing first: you could maybe start by warning people by pm before leaving neg trust to them. Maybe they could defend themselves.

Second: Laosai might have been an alt of confirmation120 but the account was sold to me before you tagged it. I bought it a few months ago, it's an alt of the account flagpara. Signed message coming just after.

Quote
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
The new owner of this account is flagpara, Feb 5, 2016
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: 1LyDN6jnwcaWRo13V8rUBjmQ7AYqfqWrpP

IP1/CpCn5cIE1fwk8K72EJZexWeBR+3sVreEHVqlDk2xVQOIqBBTJ74HAyjKfPdPGlCDvUuBw7M3vA5QbzhbqAY=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----

are you saying that flagpara sold you that account or that you are flagpara? the signed message timestamp (Feb 5, 2016) was just two days before you got tagged by lutpin.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
April 12, 2016, 08:16:55 AM
#19
Hello,

First thing first: you could maybe start by warning people by pm before leaving neg trust to them. Maybe they could defend themselves.

Second: Laosai might have been an alt of confirmation120 but the account was sold to me before you tagged it. I bought it a few months ago, it's an alt of the account flagpara. Signed message coming just after.

Quote
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
The new owner of this account is flagpara, Feb 5, 2016
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
Version: Bitcoin-qt (1.0)
Address: 1LyDN6jnwcaWRo13V8rUBjmQ7AYqfqWrpP

IP1/CpCn5cIE1fwk8K72EJZexWeBR+3sVreEHVqlDk2xVQOIqBBTJ74HAyjKfPdPGlCDvUuBw7M3vA5QbzhbqAY=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNATURE-----
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 506
Thank satoshi
April 08, 2016, 02:36:37 PM
#18
No,the point is,it does waste time of people involved and probably of the DT members as well (considering they do "value their time") ,if "you didn't care" weather the accounts were  sold or not,you shouldn't have linked them in the first place.Thanks for wasting 15 minutes of my precious time .I'm out,have fun.

I think you misunderstood my post. read again.
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1115
Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!
April 08, 2016, 02:32:41 PM
#17
to be completely frank I didn't care if they're sold or not when I posted the update (otherwise I wouldn't have added the users with neutral feedback saying they were sold). but judging from the posts here I see that the community are being more lenient about this kind of thing than before. I'll take that into consideration in the future.  Wink

still. they should be tagged as bought account because of obvious reasons.

No,the point is,it does waste time of people involved and probably of the DT members as well (considering they do "value their time") ,if "you didn't care" weather the accounts were  sold or not,you shouldn't have linked them in the first place.Thanks for wasting 15 minutes of my precious time .I'm out,have fun.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 506
Thank satoshi
April 08, 2016, 02:26:34 PM
#16
to be completely frank I didn't care if they're sold or not when I posted the update (otherwise I wouldn't have added the users with neutral feedback saying they were sold). but judging from the posts here I see that the community are being more lenient about this kind of thing than before. I'll take that into consideration in the future.  Wink
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
April 08, 2016, 01:46:36 PM
#15
So was Patatas according to my information.
I know who currently holds the account (won't disclose it though, as being told in confidence, maybe the user wants to do that himself),
and I'd say the chances are close to 0 that person is connected to confirmation120.

then why didn't you leave a neutral like you did to mr.coinstrader?

but no matter. Patatas and the others can prove that the account was sold after the scam by providing a PM proof of the trade of their accounts.

Patatas still didnt manage to come up with anything solid. Edit: Patatas provided similar information now.

I have removed the rating to Shibashi Dogemoto as they had a signed message from escrow for the trade. I couldnt verify it as for some reason the keys didnt match, but they provided enough other information that Im pretty sure there was a trade after the connection was made.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 506
Thank satoshi
April 07, 2016, 04:50:19 PM
#14
then why didn't you leave a neutral like you did to mr.coinstrader?
Confusing me with mexxer-2, are we?

oops. I mean Laosai.

Because I was told in confidence.

ah, I see.
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
April 07, 2016, 04:49:04 PM
#13
then why didn't you leave a neutral like you did to mr.coinstrader?
Confusing me with mexxer-2, are we?

oops. I mean Laosai.
Because I was told in confidence.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 506
Thank satoshi
April 07, 2016, 04:47:28 PM
#12
So was Patatas according to my information.
I know who currently holds the account (won't disclose it though, as being told in confidence, maybe the user wants to do that himself),
and I'd say the chances are close to 0 that person is connected to confirmation120.

then why didn't you leave a neutral like you did to mr.coinstrader?

but no matter. Patatas and the others can prove that the account was sold after the scam by providing a PM proof of the trade of their accounts.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
April 07, 2016, 04:43:21 PM
#11
I will ignore 2. and 3. as they have no meaning here. If you are saying you bought the account, do you have a signed message? The TX linked by Jhanzo is the finally one for all addresses so its possible that it was some sort of cash out.

This is pretty sad coming from a member like you,giving negative feedback without investigating the matter.As I have clearly mentioned ,I had purchased the account from one of the members listed above in the list ,it doesn't link me to any of them anymore.You could simply wait for me to post proofs about the account sale without abusing your trust power before hearing both sides of the story.Requesting you to remove the feedback ,proofs will be presented as you want .What do you want to conform this account is not linked to them anymore ?

What do you have that can convince me of the transfer?

Based on the word of QS and Lutpin I will temporarily remove the rating as I need some sleep now. Send me a PM if you want to keep it private.
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1115
Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!
April 07, 2016, 04:39:27 PM
#10
I will ignore 2. and 3. as they have no meaning here. If you are saying you bought the account, do you have a signed message? The TX linked by Jhanzo is the finally one for all addresses so its possible that it was some sort of cash out.

This is pretty sad coming from a member like you,giving negative feedback without investigating the matter.As I have clearly mentioned ,I had purchased the account from one of the members listed above in the list ,it doesn't link me to any of them anymore.You could simply wait for me to post proofs about the account sale without abusing your trust power before hearing both sides of the story.Requesting you to remove the feedback ,proofs will be presented as you want .What do you want to conform this account is not linked to them anymore ?
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
April 07, 2016, 04:39:07 PM
#9
I won't ever leave a negative rating for someone being an alt of a scammer unless I know with certainty that the account was not sold since the address was posted, and that I know with certainty that the scammer is not trying to frame an innocent person.
copper member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1874
Goodbye, Z.
April 07, 2016, 04:36:16 PM
#8
note that I said "might" because it seems like mr.coinstrader and Laosai was sold.
So was Patatas according to my information.
I know who currently holds the account (won't disclose it though, as being told in confidence, maybe the user wants to do that himself),
and I'd say the chances are close to 0 that person is connected to confirmation120.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
April 07, 2016, 04:29:45 PM
#7
I should've searched more thoroughly...  Undecided

Patatas,

What ? lol You do suck at finding Alt's boy.Do your homework more carefully.There are other constraints you should know about the forum.
1.The accounts could be sold at the forum .
2.New addresses could be staked.
3.Random guesses don't mean shit.

I will ignore 2. and 3. as they have no meaning here. If you are saying you bought the account, do you have a signed message? The TX linked by Jhanzo is the finally one for all addresses so its possible that it was some sort of cash out.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 506
Thank satoshi
April 07, 2016, 04:13:42 PM
#6
I should've searched more thoroughly...  Undecided

Patatas,

What ? lol You do suck at finding Alt's boy.Do your homework more carefully.There are other constraints you should know about the forum.
1.The accounts could be sold at the forum .
2.New addresses could be staked.
3.Random guesses don't mean shit.

oh yeah? well most of those addresses were used around the same time. and it's not a guess because I posted proof.
note that I said "might" because it seems like mr.coinstrader and Laosai was sold.
Pages:
Jump to: