Topic: Usability of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. (Read 789 times)
The advancement of cryptocurrency being used and accepted by a lot of merchants online has an increasing growth! That is why it is high time to invest. A lot of cryptocurrency are now emerging and the originals are bitcoin. And it is never too late to invest. One of the best is Ethereum! I like that www.propthereum.io and their whitepaper is accesible for everyone. It helps me understand the whole concept. Please check it out.
The usability of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are very different because the cryptocurrencies are created from different ideas and goals so it means that you can't tell that bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are all the same in terms of its usage or usability. You can tell what are they usability if you will do some reading about the vision and mission of the cryptocurrency.
But what about traditional banking services for cryptocurrencies? Let's say you will have opportunity to get loans in BTC or ETH, or you will be able to deposit them earning an interest? Or, for example, if you have an application where you have access to both your wallets in BTC and ETH and additionally you have an access to your bank account and you can translate funds back and forth without any problems?
I think it is all about the availability and the value of cryptocurrency. Usability means the thing of value I think, and so are the other cryptocurrency than bitcoin. If I think that bitcoin is betterthan other cryptocurrency then I will definitely turn towards bitcoin and I will also look at the current position of bitcoin in the local and international markets. The currency which is widely accepted will cover the markets.
It is reality that bitcoin and other digital currencies have vast usability all over the world, because it is not only acceptable but also very easy and secure way of transferring and paying your bills through your bitcoin wallet.
But what about traditional banking services for cryptocurrencies? Let's say you will have opportunity to get loans in BTC or ETH, or you will be able to deposit them earning an interest? Or, for example, if you have an application where you have access to both your wallets in BTC and ETH and additionally you have an access to your bank account and you can translate funds back and forth without any problems?
I think it is all about the availability and the value of cryptocurrency. Usability means the thing of value I think, and so are the other cryptocurrency than bitcoin. If I think that bitcoin is betterthan other cryptocurrency then I will definitely turn towards bitcoin and I will also look at the current position of bitcoin in the local and international markets. The currency which is widely accepted will cover the markets.
The goal of cryptocurrency is to replace current financial system with its banks and regulators, so we wouldn't need to exchange our crypto coins for fiat - instead we would just use crypto for all our transactions. It's not entirely possible for technical reasons (though we are getting close) and some major players from legacy financial system might heavily resist it. But cryptocurrencies are still very-very young, maybe it will take a few dozens of years before they will become the most widespread form of money in the world.
There are some countries yet to explore the full potential of cryptocurrencies but I guess they can use Monaco or Centra, which is in development phase. I too agree with the translation fees problem but it'll be solved soon I presume.
I agree that in some short period of time in the future the Bitcoin banks will appear. This seems like a logical step with huge rise of Bitcoin users and global acceptance. Now we already have Bitcoin debit cards and the number of similar services will increase in the future. Of course there are still a lot open questions and issues related to that but the new solutions will appear.
So, we have reached the final stage .. of what , that can be guessed easily.
When we realize that we need a bank to use bitcoin "easily".
Where the hell are those ideas coming from ?
What is the point of having bitcoin when we need a "project" to easily transfer money between you and the exchange.
If we would already have this , why using bitcoin and not this system.
A bank? Really a bank?
If he is in a grave Satoshi is spinning at 15000 RPM right now!!!
When we realize that we need a bank to use bitcoin "easily".
Where the hell are those ideas coming from ?
What is the point of having bitcoin when we need a "project" to easily transfer money between you and the exchange.
If we would already have this , why using bitcoin and not this system.
A bank? Really a bank?
If he is in a grave Satoshi is spinning at 15000 RPM right now!!!
A simple interface to make BTC usable for the mass population would be good, yes.
For me one of the biggest risks for BTC overall is security, and a 'bank' model could provide this. If BTC moons, everyone holding 0.1 may be in the equivalent state to hoarding $50,000 under their mattress. That's a lot of insecurity (and temptation for crims) right there.
It would also provide a framework for BTC investment legacy, something that doesn't seem to get a lot of attention (as long as the early adopters are alive...)
I think a BTC bank is inevitable if mass adoption is to occur, even if it does sit outside many folks vision for BTC. Good luck with it.
For me one of the biggest risks for BTC overall is security, and a 'bank' model could provide this. If BTC moons, everyone holding 0.1 may be in the equivalent state to hoarding $50,000 under their mattress. That's a lot of insecurity (and temptation for crims) right there.
It would also provide a framework for BTC investment legacy, something that doesn't seem to get a lot of attention (as long as the early adopters are alive...)
I think a BTC bank is inevitable if mass adoption is to occur, even if it does sit outside many folks vision for BTC. Good luck with it.
But what about traditional banking services for cryptocurrencies? Let's say you will have opportunity to get loans in BTC or ETH, or you will be able to deposit them earning an interest? Or, for example, if you have an application where you have access to both your wallets in BTC and ETH and additionally you have an access to your bank account and you can translate funds back and forth without any problems?
Lol! Show me the idiot who agreed to take out a loan in bitcoins! Imagine the situation when you this year took out a loan in bitcoins at 1000 dollars, and will give next year to give you $ 5,000. As you 500% APR? This is without taking into account the interests of the Bank.Imagine the situation when you are paid for your products and services in BTC at fixed rates and you are not anyhow exposed to BTC/USD exchange rate risk. Why wouldn't you take a loan in BTC, especially taking into account the fact that in this case you also do have probability of upside if the rate goes down.
I agree that it would make it easier for some users to have some sort of bank like infrastructure to help them with all of the 'difficult' technical aspects of Bitcoin.
But I would never recommend such a service to any new users, the most important thing about being a Bitcoin user is being in control of your own coins.
Bitcoin was created to let people be in charge of their own funds, right during/after the banking crisis.
But I would never recommend such a service to any new users, the most important thing about being a Bitcoin user is being in control of your own coins.
Bitcoin was created to let people be in charge of their own funds, right during/after the banking crisis.
If we need to convert Bitcoin back to fiat for making everyday transactions. Then that will defeat the overall purpose of Bitcoin as a currency. Your service won't be different from any exchange. Many exchanges provide such services by taking Bitcoin from the users and paying in fiat to service provider, atleast in my country. That project can be profitable to you but it is not new.
I believe that once services upgrade to SegWit and fix their buggy fee calculation algorithms, we will be good. Bitcoin is very suitable with transactions that involves large amounts of money and as for micro payments we will have LN soon.
I believe that community lacks some kind of important infrastructure element (like a bank) which would provide full set of traditional products and services to cryptocurrency holders - the institution that would serve the needs of the community and would reduce complexities and transaction costs . What do you think about this? If such element would exist, what else functions do you think it should do and how else it could help the cryptocurrency community?
I don't really think anything of that
At least, not yet. What we need right now are cheap and instant-fast transactions on the network level. Since you are talking about reducing transaction costs, I'm curious what your point is. If you mean yet another web wallet (under whatever name) with in-house transactions fast and free, there is nothing new since there are already quite a few web wallets out there. If you mean something else, please explain, but stop using all these buzz words like "innovative financial technology infrastructure elements". They are falling on deaf ears
Do you agree that usability of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in real monetary world is quite complicated and is associated with high transaction costs?
no and no.it is not really complicated if you don't complicate it for yourself. it is the easiest thing in the world! you choose a wallet then in that wallet there is usually a section called receive, you copy that "thing" in there that is in fact your bitcoin address and receive bitcoin.
to send you go in the same wallet and go to (surprise surprise) send section and paste the "thing" that the other party gave you to pay him. that thing is his bitcoin address.
which part of it was hard and complicated?
I am talking that it is complicated in terms that not everybody accepts BTC. You can easily transfer BTC from your wallet to another and pay for services and products - that's true, but if you would like to buy something and the merchant does not accept BTC - it is a problem. Imagine you would like to buy real estate or an expensive car, than it gets complicated and you will have at first to use the exchange to get fiat money to pay for it.
Of course it's a problem. But you can't build a massive, self-sufficient economy in a day, or a few years. What else would you expect in the early adoption phase of a technology? In the future, it is expected that one wouldn't need to exchange to fiat money to pay for anything. But nobody should expect that to happen overnight.
I completely agree with you, such things do not happen overnight and even in a couple of years - it will take much time for traditional economies to adopt crypto assets. However, innovative financial technology infrastructure elements might be created in the nearest future and using their services you might be able to pay with your BTC to a merchant selling in EUR, whereas the bank will provide clearing procedure by itself - BTC will be taken from you and merchant will receive EUR without even knowing the transaction was somehow connected to cryptocurrency.
I am talking that it is complicated in terms that not everybody accepts BTC.
they are not accepting bitcoin because it is volatile, because it is not regulated and most important of all because people are not willing to spend their bitcoin (it is their investment after all!).
it is not at all because of it being complicated!
an advanced approach is setting up a wallet that generates a new address for every purchase. an easier approach is to go through a payment processor like BitPay. again not at all complicated.
Do you agree that usability of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in real monetary world is quite complicated and is associated with high transaction costs?
no and no.it is not really complicated if you don't complicate it for yourself. it is the easiest thing in the world! you choose a wallet then in that wallet there is usually a section called receive, you copy that "thing" in there that is in fact your bitcoin address and receive bitcoin.
to send you go in the same wallet and go to (surprise surprise) send section and paste the "thing" that the other party gave you to pay him. that thing is his bitcoin address.
which part of it was hard and complicated?
I am talking that it is complicated in terms that not everybody accepts BTC. You can easily transfer BTC from your wallet to another and pay for services and products - that's true, but if you would like to buy something and the merchant does not accept BTC - it is a problem. Imagine you would like to buy real estate or an expensive car, than it gets complicated and you will have at first to use the exchange to get fiat money to pay for it.
Of course it's a problem. But you can't build a massive, self-sufficient economy in a day, or a few years. What else would you expect in the early adoption phase of a technology? In the future, it is expected that one wouldn't need to exchange to fiat money to pay for anything. But nobody should expect that to happen overnight.
Do you agree that usability of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in real monetary world is quite complicated and is associated with high transaction costs?
no and no.it is not really complicated if you don't complicate it for yourself. it is the easiest thing in the world! you choose a wallet then in that wallet there is usually a section called receive, you copy that "thing" in there that is in fact your bitcoin address and receive bitcoin.
to send you go in the same wallet and go to (surprise surprise) send section and paste the "thing" that the other party gave you to pay him. that thing is his bitcoin address.
which part of it was hard and complicated?
I am talking that it is complicated in terms that not everybody accepts BTC. You can easily transfer BTC from your wallet to another and pay for services and products - that's true, but if you would like to buy something and the merchant does not accept BTC - it is a problem. Imagine you would like to buy real estate or an expensive car, than it gets complicated and you will have at first to use the exchange to get fiat money to pay for it.
Do you agree that usability of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in real monetary world is quite complicated and is associated with high transaction costs?
no and no.it is not really complicated if you don't complicate it for yourself. it is the easiest thing in the world! you choose a wallet then in that wallet there is usually a section called receive, you copy that "thing" in there that is in fact your bitcoin address and receive bitcoin.
to send you go in the same wallet and go to (surprise surprise) send section and paste the "thing" that the other party gave you to pay him. that thing is his bitcoin address.
which part of it was hard and complicated?
Quote
I mean if you have Bitcoins or Ethereum in order to cash out with fiat currencies you have to go through complicated procedures and in some countries it is not allowed in general (if you receive money to your IBAN from some kind of unregulated Bitcoin exchange, the money will be frozen).
then that is an issue with banking system not bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency!Quote
I believe that community lacks some kind of important infrastructure element (like a bank) which would provide full set of traditional products and services to cryptocurrency holders - the institution that would serve the needs of the community and would reduce complexities and transaction costs. What do you think about this? If such element would exist, what else functions do you think it should do and how else it could help the cryptocurrency community?
Our team is working on interesting project and your ideas would be highly appreciated and might be taken into account.
Thank you for your ideas and willingness to share your opinion.
i don't know. i will probably need a lot more information than that to be able to say anything. information on its regulation, the fees that "like a bank" place will have, the verification steps it will require and more. Our team is working on interesting project and your ideas would be highly appreciated and might be taken into account.
Thank you for your ideas and willingness to share your opinion.
But what about traditional banking services for cryptocurrencies? Let's say you will have opportunity to get loans in BTC or ETH, or you will be able to deposit them earning an interest? Or, for example, if you have an application where you have access to both your wallets in BTC and ETH and additionally you have an access to your bank account and you can translate funds back and forth without any problems?
Lol! Show me the idiot who agreed to take out a loan in bitcoins! Imagine the situation when you this year took out a loan in bitcoins at 1000 dollars, and will give next year to give you $ 5,000. As you 500% APR? This is without taking into account the interests of the Bank. Jump to: