он по-прежнему в Интернете люди
173.34.203.191
Topic: UseCoin Scam - page 7. (Read 9017 times)
он по-прежнему в Интернете люди
173.34.203.191
The problem is there is no barrier to overcome to get listed on an exchange,just a few tweets,a few words in IRC etc and you're on.
Devs should need to prove themselves,and be willing to go the extra mile to do so if they want to be listed on a good exchange,there should be some minimum standards in place to filter the crap,it's not a complete solution but it's a start.
yes there is bribery Devs should need to prove themselves,and be willing to go the extra mile to do so if they want to be listed on a good exchange,there should be some minimum standards in place to filter the crap,it's not a complete solution but it's a start.
Something the major exchanges could do, but expect they won't, is use some sort of minimal standards before listing any ipo/ico/icd coins, even if they didn't run the ipo through an exchange.
It could be something basic, like that pod or coinssource trust rating + code review. If there are lurking premines, the coins won't be listed until the premines are destroyed.
Note that I don't say to do this for every single coin listed, as that would be a lot of manpower, and financially it may not make sense ... as if bittrex doesn't list a new coin, someone else will. But even though there seems to be a lot of ipo coins out there lately, there aren't so many that this isn't feasible. IPO coins naturally hold a higher risk than the standard coin, due to the devs receiving funds upfront. So it's not unreasonable if exchanges hold them to a higher standard.
Made about 40,000 USD.
I'm wondering who is buying it now ! 
too many scam happen on bittrex recently, see: NJA,CLN,USB,ICB,USE,DRKC......etc. u guys sure Bittrex are not part of these scams. only got fees from these scams.
what a joke
I'm thinking about it everytime! what a joke
Bittrex is involved!
The problem is there is no barrier to overcome to get listed on an exchange,just a few tweets,a few words in IRC etc and you're on.
Devs should need to prove themselves,and be willing to go the extra mile to do so if they want to be listed on a good exchange,there should be some minimum standards in place to filter the crap,it's not a complete solution but it's a start.
Devs should need to prove themselves,and be willing to go the extra mile to do so if they want to be listed on a good exchange,there should be some minimum standards in place to filter the crap,it's not a complete solution but it's a start.
It is not Bittrex fault, all scam coins started all in C-cex and ends up in Bittrex 
Bittrex will disconnect a coin soon and will tell you good-bye
Not entirely Bittrex's fault, but they DO bear some responsibility for ICOs they host.
The need to step up to the plate and put an end to this crap.
The need to step up to the plate and put an end to this crap.
We did not host this ICO.
Although you did not host it, if you agreed to destroy coins, you shouldn't have listed it until the coins were actually destroyed. Common sense should have told you that there was a danger to having such a large premine sitting out there... and was there any real harm waiting 24-48 hours before listing the coin? Not like c-cex would eat up all of the trading profits going on. They aren't exactly an exchange juggernaut with tons of volume.
Except your time line is all wrong. We were asked to destroy the pre-mine AFTER the coin was already listed. No good deed goes unpunished. In the future we will likely not offer our services in destroying coins so as not to get dragged into these scandals.
Poor innocent little Bittrex. Collecting fees from scams.
Maybe if you weren't in such a rush to add every little coin without some proper investigation of what you were getting into people wouldn't "drag you into these scandals".
You involve yourself in them when you list the coins. No one forces you to add them.
This +1
I keep seeing ipo and ico. What's the difference?
IPO host by coin devs, ICO host by exchange.
I keep seeing ipo and ico. What's the difference?
None really, just interchangeable terms. Same thing with ICD too.
Just depends on what an exchange or dev decides to call their ipo.
too many scam happen on bittrex recently, see: NJA,CLN,USB,ICB,USE,DRKC......etc. u guys sure Bittrex are not part of these scams. only got fees from these scams.
what a joke
what a joke
I keep seeing ipo and ico. What's the difference?
ip of shameyou 173.34.203.191
Canada... hmmm 173.34.203.191Except your time line is all wrong. We were asked to destroy the pre-mine AFTER the coin was already listed. No good deed goes unpunished. In the future we will likely not offer our services in destroying coins so as not to get dragged into these scandals.
Ah, my mistake then.
I do suggest however if a dev states that a premine will be destroyed -- even if it's not through bittrex -- that the exchange hold off on listing it. The issue isn't that you agreed to destroy the coins. It's that you listed the coin before the premine was destroyed, regardless of who was supposed to destroy it.
Of course if the dev didn't state any premine was to be destroyed until after you listed it, you can't take any blame, as you couldn't have know about it. Again, not sure when it was mentioned or not in the ann thread.
Not entirely Bittrex's fault, but they DO bear some responsibility for ICOs they host.
The need to step up to the plate and put an end to this crap.
The need to step up to the plate and put an end to this crap.
We did not host this ICO.
Although you did not host it, if you agreed to destroy coins, you shouldn't have listed it until the coins were actually destroyed. Common sense should have told you that there was a danger to having such a large premine sitting out there... and was there any real harm waiting 24-48 hours before listing the coin? Not like c-cex would eat up all of the trading profits going on. They aren't exactly an exchange juggernaut with tons of volume.
Except your time line is all wrong. We were asked to destroy the pre-mine AFTER the coin was already listed. No good deed goes unpunished. In the future we will likely not offer our services in destroying coins so as not to get dragged into these scandals.
Poor innocent little Bittrex. Collecting fees from scams.
Maybe if you weren't in such a rush to add every little coin without some proper investigation of what you were getting into people wouldn't "drag you into these scandals".
You involve yourself in them when you list the coins. No one forces you to add them.
Jump to: