Topic: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone - page 28. (Read 146348 times)

Has anyone who is participating in this discussion (or otherwise) directly asked Tomatocage for a signed message? If he is unable to or *unwilling to* provide one, then you could assume that the account is compromised considering the influx of hacked accounts. It would be very trivial to provide adequate evidence of the original owner being in possession of the account this way.

---

I also don't see why the negative has been given. If we were leaving DT negatives whenever someone made any kind of accusation, I would need to send out another few hundred/thousands negatives. Meanwhile, TomatoCago does not leave negatives to Quickseller who (among other things):
1) Has made a lot of baseless accusations (see QS vs. zepher et. al.).
2) Has sold DT accounts to known scammers: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ryland-r-taylor-almanza-mixan-needs-removed-from-dt-1902308.

You seem to be having a bet each way as to whether or not I'm right or wrong (and also seem to be the only one banging the drum about TomatoCage coming back to life wholly and solely to give me some Butt Hurt TM.)

When I made the suggestion that TomatoCage sign a message with the wallet they staked in their own thread, he/she/it went off line. (and still hasn't posted since last year)

I removed TomatoCage from my trust list months ago, so I have no idea what the rest of you see as my trust value - anyone want to share?


A different veteran or a more veteran member?

That investigation was not done by me but was the work of timelord. I really appreciate the amount of work he do to uncover the shady people here..He is not always right in his judgement but not also wrong.

And I didn't misspelled the Chivas to chevas it was intentional because I had a Chivas malt that night while making this account.

---

I see TC has given a feedback to timelord which states:

"This user makes absurd and baseless accusations with absolutely zero evidence that my account is linked in any way with any of the accounts he accuses me of being. I'll remove this when he can provide any evidence at all.
"

As per feedbacks given by timelord they clearly redirects you to the reference on which he made the feedback and still TC is asking proof. Not sure if they are valid..I would like to see some veteran members to analyze it.
As TC has woke up after a long time a signed message will b helpful to prove the real ownership.

Chevas Regal, that's an insane amount of work. I wonder how much money you could have made working a $5 an hour job the same amount of time.

BTW: You misspelled Chivas Regal. Chivas Regal 18 year old Gold Signature is my favorite scotch.

Well, if anyone should be able to verify their UID via a wallet address, then it should be TomatoCage...

Now let's see:


Would you look at that? It even has some funds in it - how'd that happen?  https://blockchain.info/address/1FLnpvdXL6ooBpFj2LHqZxQsrxn2voj5uv  

Seems strange to me as well on grounds of language and how he is explaining things that he had done shady. (I guess your feedback didn't had something connected to it or was it ?)

[/quote]
So any ways to verify this(if his account was compromised)? As TC(account) is trusted so should the community ask him to prove the ownership as a original user? Zakir went to ong vacation like this, xetsr is also on vacation and Tc has just finished the vacation trip

I'd say Tomatocage's account has been hacked given the language of this PM they sent to me the other day:

27 Accounts Connected:

ShakinHandz u=141051 Alanay u=263555 justspare u=386997 frodoe7 u=519403 morocco.man u=525932 mustang01 u=532322 aicha3011 u=533060 ifightformerkel . u=533349 Cereberus u=536619 smho_16 u=544789 marcos258 u=550375 bleachedno u=552856 rally-oillybia u=560942 hex13 u=561359 casio87 u=562081 wmz1987 u=633242 funday u=637255 zend7 u=639442 from10to1280 u=713392 samantlia u=739523 BitcoinSupremo u=754727 fbads u=797201 nexaly u=801585 Josephps u=812432 roni80 u=812811 Renovel u=813137 dogchain u=824352

Proof:
    
Scammer Family Tree Mk II - morocco.man - 27 UID's connected!  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scammer-family-tree-mk-ii-moroccoman-27-uids-connected-1925386  http://archive.is/aEwee

Accounts connected: redfin31, ongahawak

Proof: address
Redfin31:
arhive: https://archive.fo/UJAEU

misc
Both accounts are wearing bitsler signature(ongahawak is junior member, if i am not wrong bitsler signature campaign is s.member above), and both accounts are cheating in bitsler giveaway:

Sure, it would be fun to prove the trust system was worthless. I don't trust anyone here so I don't buy anything. I don't need to sell anything (like coins) because I use other legimate resources for that so the trust system is useless for me.

I came up with this plan when the idiots above gave me negative trust with for no reason and with no proof other than they were butthurt.

There was this guy named Tradefortress that had the best trust rating I think I've ever seen. He scammed over 4000 btc out of users here.

There was a guy here named DeathNTaxes that was a Bitcoin expert extraordinaire. He was well respected and had a great trust rating. He scammed 3500 btc from users here.

There was a beloved entrepreneur here called Zhou Tong. People loved him so much that I honestly think guys would cum a little in their pants when he responded directly to them in a post. He was trusted by everyone bar none. He scammed 5000 btc from users here and it was discovered he was nothing more than a 16 year old boy when he did it.

There was a guy here named TerryTibbs that had a horrible trust rating and was labeled a scammer. He paid off everyone that he owed every penny that he owed them and is a very honorable guy.

So you can see that the trust system has a long history of being a completely worthless judge of character and future performance. I jokingly call it the "false hope and pray system".

Do you really want 100 negatives?  I realize you don't care, but on this forum it does make a difference, whether you admit it or not.  If you don't do deals here then it doesn't matter, but I don't know.  I've got a trust wall full of gluteus-wounded idiots' comments, and I'd give half my left nut to get rid of them.  Not doing me much good anyway.  

Oh well, thanks anyway.

I want to try to get to 100 negative trust before Christmas without ever buying, selling, trading, exchanging or scamming anyone. Only 98 to go. LOL

Ask others. It is not something I like to give neg or pos . And it is not a joke of some kind. I will give feedback if I feel it and I haven't felt in your case.

The difference is dude - I don't care and I don't use the trust system at all. ROFL

Feel free to leave him neg trust for trust abuse as his trust left for me is as well as actmyname's is baseless and patently false with no reference to back it up.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=72795

Hey dude, do me a solid and put some negative trust on me. You look like you like to rate people. I don't care what you say about me so be creative. I'm trying to build as much neg trust as possible without ever having traded on here before to prove trust systems are useless.

Thanks in advance.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19015899
Maybe your guess is wrong .-.

Why should I do? it's already clear to me and yeah btw hilarious placed the negative rating as he finds you untrustworthy. BTW there are lot other feedbacks that you are not counting (incl. Whywefight who also finds it in same).


Guess you deserved that :/