[User Generated] - Known alts of anyone - page 7.

777Bitcoin

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: Lauda on November 18, 2017, 02:40:51 PM

Quote from: 777Bitcoin on November 18, 2017, 02:36:32 PM

Ok, i know I won’t win to someone who is close-minded for reality.

Ad hominem against someone who bases themselves on logic. Does not compute.

Quote from: 777Bitcoin on November 18, 2017, 02:36:32 PM

Hope you give chances to those have committed an error of applying on they’re newbie career the same chance that the admin give you from yours.

Almost* everyone deserves a second chance. Given a sufficient amount of time** one account may be flagged down to neutral.

* Chronic scammers and pests like Quickseller do not.
** Do not think that "sufficient amount of time" means 1-3 months and annoy me via PM as some have done.

Thanks lauda. Rest assured that I’m not a kind of a man without a word. I do care for my reputation and will wait for you to see that I will no give harm to the place I called home. Thanks. Even a gently tune is enough for me from someone I’m afraid of because not illegal things you know, I’m afraid of my mother you know. Hope catch with you. Not in this embarrassing moment actually.

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3500

Merit: 6981

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: 777Bitcoin on November 18, 2017, 02:36:32 PM

Quote from: Lauda on November 18, 2017, 02:27:44 PM

Quote from: 777Bitcoin on November 18, 2017, 02:25:35 PM

Let’s talk logically, if applying without proof of acceptance is a crime for any one else.

Logically, you tried to abuse the campaign. Whether you actually succeeded in that attempt or not is not of much relevance (unless we are trying to calculate the damage that you've done).

Ok, i know I won’t win to someone who is close-minded for reality. I know you lauda and respected you. I’ve been doing Campaigns for my own good that is true but I’m not harming anyone because the time I know the rules, I always follow. Hope you give chances to those have committed an error of applying on they’re newbie career the same chance that the admin give you from yours. I won’t beg for anything because that will not help. Just look at my post everything, if I do harm to anyone or someone. Then destiny will judge me.

Dude, your English sucks and your posts suck. Aside from trying to cheat campaigns with alt accounts, there's no way you should ever be paid for posting here. It's users like you who are responsible for the extreme avalanche of shittiness that's hit bitcointalk. Anyone who visited bitcointalk and didn't know what was going on would doubtless scratch their heads and wonder why a bunch of foreigners would waste their time writing unintelligible one-liners that obviously contribute nothing to any discussion. Not only should you have a neg, you should be permabanned. So IMO you got off easy.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: 777Bitcoin on November 18, 2017, 02:36:32 PM

Ok, i know I won’t win to someone who is close-minded for reality.

Ad hominem against someone who bases themselves on logic. Does not compute.

Quote from: 777Bitcoin on November 18, 2017, 02:36:32 PM

Hope you give chances to those have committed an error of applying on they’re newbie career the same chance that the admin give you from yours.

Almost* everyone deserves a second chance. Given a sufficient amount of time** one account may be flagged down to neutral.

* Chronic scammers and pests like Quickseller do not.
** Do not think that "sufficient amount of time" means 1-3 months and annoy me via PM as some have done.

777Bitcoin

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: Lauda on November 18, 2017, 02:27:44 PM

Quote from: 777Bitcoin on November 18, 2017, 02:25:35 PM

Let’s talk logically, if applying without proof of acceptance is a crime for any one else.

Logically, you tried to abuse the campaign. Whether you actually succeeded in that attempt or not is not of much relevance (unless we are trying to calculate the damage that you've done).

Ok, i know I won’t win to someone who is close-minded for reality. I know you lauda and respected you. I’ve been doing Campaigns for my own good that is true but I’m not harming anyone because the time I know the rules, I always follow. Hope you give chances to those have committed an error of applying on they’re newbie career the same chance that the admin give you from yours. I won’t beg for anything because that will not help. Just look at my post everything, if I do harm to anyone or someone. Then destiny will judge me.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: 777Bitcoin on November 18, 2017, 02:25:35 PM

Let’s talk logically, if applying without proof of acceptance is a crime for any one else.

Logically, you tried to abuse the campaign. Whether you actually succeeded in that attempt or not is not of much relevance (unless we are trying to calculate the damage that you've done).

777Bitcoin

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: Lauda on November 18, 2017, 02:16:00 PM

Quote from: 777Bitcoin on November 18, 2017, 02:11:52 PM

But give me one same campaign with pay that I’m been with Nameless27 and 777bitcoin. And I will stop.

Deflecting, are we?

Nameless27 applies to Care4Me campaign here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20464436.
Bubblebit applies to the same campaign here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20159468.

Both accounts are owned by you (as proven in my previous post and by the person who made the discovery). QED.

Let’s talk logically, if applying without proof of acceptance is a crime for any one else. A company with two same last name is not allowed but the one go out and say it’s over is it a violation to you, I don’t know how does a Jr. Member at that time can someone with high rank knows more than what I meant. I don’t want to mean that I’m ignorance because i am does anyone here is not. I would assume we do both know that.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: 777Bitcoin on November 18, 2017, 02:11:52 PM

But give me one same campaign with pay that I’m been with Nameless27 and 777bitcoin. And I will stop.

Deflecting, are we?

Nameless27 applies to Care4Me campaign here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20464436.
Bubblebit applies to the same campaign here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20159468.

Both accounts are owned by you (as proven in my previous post and by the person who made the discovery). QED.

777Bitcoin

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Because in the first place if I’m not Nameless27 I would have denied it already and I’m not because in the first place I’m using the same address over and over again. Does having the same address with different campaign a lie to you? I’m not good on this way of arguing why? Because I’m not a good lier and will not attempt to. But give me one same campaign with pay that I’m been with Nameless27 and 777bitcoin. And I will stop.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: 777Bitcoin on November 18, 2017, 02:00:43 PM

Is this how DT do this, if someone accused anyone of having same account in one campaign without proof..

You are now a confirmed liar that can't be trusted. The proof is there, and is trivially confirmed.

Quote from: Nameless27 on July 29, 2017, 04:52:38 AM

Bitcointalk Name: Nameless27
Forum Rank: Jr. Member
Current Post Count: 35
Bitcoin Address: 39aNL5grCE7x3HVdECRf3CVne6UeBDtiUC
Etherium Address: 0x89f42dcEfBDa73F602BD3256f7955dd65C962783

Quote from: bubblebit on July 15, 2017, 06:15:33 PM

I'm willing to participate if you have 1 slot for Jr. Member thats open.

Bitcointalk Name: bubblebit
Forum Rank: Jr. Member
Current Post Count: 36
Bitcoin Address: 3NZEfFY9GHDXaQQvpowG8cp5XjgEEaLwBP
Etherium Address:
0x70108dB63448F6Dd416C53123D60F7f6CBd40a06

You're connected to Nameless via:

Quote from: 777Bitcoin on August 22, 2017, 05:25:16 AM

BctTalk name : 777bitcoin
Rank : Jr. Member
Current post count : 40
BTC Address : 39aNL5grCE7x3HVdECRf3CVne6UeBDtiUC
Wear appropriate signature : Yes

Nameless uses it here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.20921438

Quote from: 777Bitcoin on November 18, 2017, 02:00:43 PM

Having an alt is not a crime if it is not in the same campaign right or wrong.

That depends on what you are doing with that alt and how many alts we are talking about.

777Bitcoin

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 100

Quote from: Coiner_ on November 07, 2017, 06:59:29 PM

Accounts Connected:

#1 Nameless27
#2 777Bitcoin
#3 Bubblebit
#4 ALT67890

Proof:

Using Blocktrail...

- Nameless27, 777Bitcoin and Bubblebit connected by 39aNL5grCE7x3HVdECRf3CVne6UeBDtiUC address.

- Alt67890 and Bubblebit connected by 3NZEfFY9GHDXaQQvpowG8cp5XjgEEaLwBP address.

- Alt67... and Bubble connected by 35bDuLoq6R2F4w1UDPS9UjJPcjoN6YHSDh address.

Addresses:

Code:

39aNL5grCE7x3HVdECRf3CVne6UeBDtiUC
3NZEfFY9GHDXaQQvpowG8cp5XjgEEaLwBP
35bDuLoq6R2F4w1UDPS9UjJPcjoN6YHSDh

0x23A38C4825bB1d7aE7882005A9c9b1433d91cCD4

Miscellaneous:

3rd linking address clearly shows him enrolling or trying to enroll in the same campaign with more than one account.

Is this how DT do this, if someone accused anyone of having same account in one campaign without proof then give negative without messaging someone accused of a crime that is not even proven of? Do having 2 accounts with different campaigns that is even not against the rule? Having an alt is not a crime if it is not in the same campaign right or wrong.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Reserved 1 more post for the list.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Doc Martin

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

BTC-Graphicdesigns

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: Lauda on November 14, 2017, 05:50:15 AM

Quote from: Wendigo on November 14, 2017, 05:47:55 AM

Oh look who has been caught with his hand in the cookie jar Grin

I was not caught with anything. The fact that you jump on this pathetic bandwagon just shows how butthurt you are.

Quote from: Wendigo on November 14, 2017, 05:47:55 AM

Anyone going to whip out the red paint now?

No, as I have not done anything wrong. Unless of course, they plan on abusing their position like a certain someone. Roll Eyes

For christ sake the proof is right here!!! Catwoman bought and nuked the account!!!
Theymos I call you out, give her negative trust already!!!

Quote from: Lauda on November 16, 2017, 03:35:48 AM

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 03:12:37 AM

Heck, Lauda was banned several times for spamming, too.

Why are you repeating something that is well known and irrelevant? I became a staff member as a result of my ban(s). Without them, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 02:59:37 AM

Yet adds people to SMAS w/o informing them then neg trusts them just for applying to a sig campaign.

Both of which are my right. If you try to cheat, then you are not trustworthy and you get tagged.

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 02:59:37 AM

You think those people get a second chance??

Depends on each individual case.

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 02:59:37 AM

Lauda gets lots of second chances and double standards. Funny that.

That is a lie. This connection is just a butthurt and weak attempt at discrediting me. The "second chance" regarding Xanis and myself happened during and post the ban.

My posts get deleted when I say catwoman is butthurt. Catwoman can use the butthurt in every second post she does and the posts dont get deleted! Once again, I call you out Theymos, time to set things straight here!

TheUltraElite

legendary

Activity: 2898

Merit: 1253

So anyway, I applied as a merit source :)

Okay so this is my first attempt at busting some alts based on my own intuition. Lets see if I can bust them properly

Accounts connected: GraceSh0wer, GraceShower

Proof:
1.Newbie accounts with close UIDs and similar usernames.
2.Both have local times similar.
Here are some images which have shown these evidences:

&

3.
GraceShower made a post on: November 10, 2017, 09:22:50 AM
GraceSh0wer made a post on: November 10, 2017, 09:23:34 PM

GraceShower made a post on: November 14, 2017, 06:12:25 PM
GraceSh0wer made a post on: November 14, 2017, 06:11:55 PM

Rest of the posts are also in this format and I guess this shows that it is the same user farming these accounts.

Addresses: None yet but I am expecting some addresses to be posted soon. Since they have started shitposting..

Miscellaneous: They seem to be alts however I will be following up based on any evidence that comes up. As of now I will be keeping an eye on these two.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 03:56:01 AM

I guess the moral of the story is to aspire to be the worst shitposter in forum history because then you might get promoted to staff?? Good example.

No. The moral of the story is that you aren't smart enough to understand it; i.e. you are just a butthurt shill.

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 03:56:01 AM

If you add someone to SMAS without informing them how are they "cheating"?

That is not cheating, and I have never said that it was.

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 03:56:01 AM

In fact, even if they know they are on SMAS, how are they "cheating"? Its the campaign managers prerogative to accept an applicant or not on the merits of their posts.

Wrong. If the campaign explicitly states that people on the SMAS list are disallowed, and it links the very same list in the OP of the post then it is up to the potential applicants to check whether they meet this requirement or not (the same goes for any other requirement). Trying to get into the campaign knowing that you are banned is equal to attempting to cheat and thus it gets handled appropriately.

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 03:56:01 AM

Given that you have bid on and offered to buy accounts in the past

I have not.

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 03:56:01 AM

will the 8 people that you tagged yesterday with negative trust and the following for feedback be offered a second chance?? "Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming."

Maybe in 3-4 years. Roll Eyes

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 03:56:01 AM

Right so you engage in account trading

That is a lie.

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 03:56:01 AM

And everyone who is a liar and deserves negative trust for lying

FTFY.

If you were a honest member with actual concerns, you'd be trying to do something beneficial to this forum and not go on vendettas out of spite. Poisoning the well.

Doc Martin

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: Lauda on November 16, 2017, 03:35:48 AM

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 03:12:37 AM

Heck, Lauda was banned several times for spamming, too.

Why are you repeating something that is well known and irrelevant? I became a staff member as a result of my ban(s). Without them, we wouldn't be having this conversation.and post the ban.

I guess the moral of the story is to aspire to be the worst shitposter in forum history because then you might get promoted to staff?? Good example.

Quote from: Lauda on November 16, 2017, 03:35:48 AM

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 02:59:37 AM

Yet adds people to SMAS w/o informing them then neg trusts them just for applying to a sig campaign.

Both of which are my right. If you try to cheat, then you are not trustworthy and you get tagged.

If you add someone to SMAS without informing them how are they "cheating"?

In fact, even if they know they are on SMAS, how are they "cheating"? Its the campaign managers prerogative to accept an applicant or not on the merits of their posts.

I think this is activity is actually far worse than your account trading history.

Quote from: Lauda on November 16, 2017, 03:35:48 AM

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 02:59:37 AM

You think those people get a second chance??

Depends on each individual case.

Given that you have bid on and offered to buy accounts in the past, will the 8 people that you tagged yesterday with negative trust and the following for feedback be offered a second chance?? "Account sales encourage scams, spam, and account farming."

Quote from: Lauda on November 16, 2017, 03:35:48 AM

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 02:59:37 AM

Lauda gets lots of second chances and double standards. Funny that.

That is a lie. This connection is just a butthurt and weak attempt at discrediting me. The "second chance" regarding Xanis and myself happened during and post the ban.

Right so you engage in account trading while giving everyone else red paint for doing the same. Your proven alt is perma-banned and engaged in account trading, but you are exempt from having your alt connections added to "[User Generated] - Known alts of anyone." Got it.

And everyone is a liar and deserves negative trust from you for pointing out these proven connections. Cool story!

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 03:12:37 AM

Heck, Lauda was banned several times for spamming, too.

Why are you repeating something that is well known and irrelevant? I became a staff member as a result of my ban(s). Without them, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 02:59:37 AM

Yet adds people to SMAS w/o informing them then neg trusts them just for applying to a sig campaign.

Both of which are my right. If you try to cheat, then you are not trustworthy and you get tagged.

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 02:59:37 AM

You think those people get a second chance??

Depends on each individual case.

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 02:59:37 AM

Lauda gets lots of second chances and double standards. Funny that.

That is a lie. This connection is just a butthurt and weak attempt at discrediting me. The "second chance" regarding Xanis and myself happened during and post the ban.

actmyname

copper member

Activity: 2562

Merit: 2510

Spear the bees

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 03:12:37 AM

Heck, Lauda was banned several times for spamming, too. Yet adds people to SMAS w/o informing them then neg trusts them just for applying to a sig campaign

I don't see your point here. If I was a reformed thief, am I now disallowed from performing a citizen's arrest upon other thieves?

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 03:12:37 AM

You think those people get a second chance??

Yes I do.

Quote from: Doc Martin on November 16, 2017, 03:12:37 AM

If this standard applies to Lauda, it should apply to everyone. Everyone should get the benefit of the doubt. Because Lauda does.

I've talked previously about how times have changed and that negative ratings in those days were not usually the norm unless the accounts were hacked.

Doc Martin

newbie

Activity: 36

Merit: 0

Quote from: actmyname on November 16, 2017, 03:04:54 AM

or we can take the other perspective and imagine it being a shitpost.

If this standard applies to Lauda, it should apply to everyone. Everyone should get the benefit of the doubt. Because Lauda does.

But clearly, this standard only applies to Lauda. Everyone else caught buying accounts get red paint. From Lauda.

Heck, Lauda was banned several times for spamming, too. Yet adds people to SMAS w/o informing them then neg trusts them just for applying to a sig campaign. You think those people get a second chance?? Haha!! Lauda gets lots of second chances and double standards. Funny that.

Topic: [User Generated] - Known alts of anyone - page 7. (Read 146348 times)