Topic: User SmokerFace - Recycling posts for sig campaign, new way of cheating ? (Read 1899 times)

Come on, don't delete the drama including some insight in how your mind works. It's not the first post I've seen in which you blame anyone else instead of yourself.

Even if it were true (which I seriously doubt), it's easier to blame others and point out their mistakes, rather than admitting your own faults. You blame your parents, your teachers, your friends, the Catholic church, the world, and anything or anyone else but yourself. This is a very common trait with young people and it usually doesn't change until they get older.

No, my friend, the problem is with you, and it will always be with you. Do not blame others for everything that's wrong in your life, because you need to realize that your life is only yours and there is only one person to be blamed in that game altogether with your laziness and cowardice. No matter what you've been through in life, you're not a victim.

Taking responsibility and accountability for your own life is a sign of maturity, whereas blaming others is a sign of immaturity and stupidity.


This just proves how damaged you really are. Seek help asap!

**irrelevant sob story**

In any case, I'm willing to promote 100 companies like 1xbit and I don't give a damn about humans, as I said in the past if you can't keep the money you earn then you don't deserve it.
One of the mods is also favoring this "A fool and their money is separated" I'm glad we're even on this one..

If the fool isn't concerned as to where they use their money then why are you about theirs?

---

**removed due to being incomprehensible by the Majority **

Archive of OP: https://ninjastic.space/post/59026551
I prefer this one rather than Windows 98 style loyce

It is not against the rules of the forum, but if it is a publicly known fact that what you promote causes great financial damage to other people, then any honest member of the forum would be expected to stop giving visibility to such a company.


I got my rank on the forum because I deserved it according to the rules of the forum even before the merit system existed - and even if I didn't get 1000 airdropped merits, I've earned 2000+ merits so far which is enough for Legendary rank x2.


It's just my observation of your behavior, and the term I used is very common in my country for people who would do anything for money - it was not my intention to offend your mother as you understood it. What you wrote is actually much more offensive, you should respect your parents, yet they are the reason you exist.

You made 10 posts in 20 minutes and it was a steaming pile of shit.

I have reported another pile of shit from a few days ago. This should end either with you getting banned or mods getting really pissed at me, which is fine either way.

Some examples to illustrate the garbage you're posting:



(didn't even read the title of the thread; it said 0.01 not 0.1 BTC)

... and so on.

"Recyclying posts, new way of cheating.." Is it new way of cheating?... even if it is or it is not... then am i still doing it?... suchmoon the professional stalker had to reopen this dead thread because i made 10+ posts in a day.

Reminded me of a girl who stalked me to my apartment and later on i came to know about that... god knows how many strings i had to pull to get rid of her.

You might want to read the title of this thread again.

User SmokerFace - Recycling posts for sig campaign, new way of cheating ?

I'm not that user and i don't have time to check losers...but do you have any proof that I plagiarised? I'm sure I would be banned by now if I did.. and jobless scums are already verifying my posts that I am sure of.

My question is - Are you one of those Jawhead999?

Who said it's not against forum rules? You, right? Well you better check this user https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.57865935
He got banned due to plagiarism by translating an article without adding the sources. It's still plagiarism even you're translating the article, because you're not the person who created the content.

You might want to read the rules. At least the first one.

What unethical activities are you referring to?... promoting a website isn't against the forum's rules... The service that i promote isn't illegal where i live.
I don't give a damn about people who're out of 100 miles of range from where i live unless i know them.

Even if i buy posts which "maybe i don't" and "maybe translated into different languages" still not against the rules/laws on this forum If you have read the Rules of this forum (Which you haven't even after being a legendary member) seems you're entitled to Legendary Tag and some merits you got.

Since you're entitled to your Rank and merits earned then it doesn't give you the right to tell people that they will sell their own mother for 5 bucks (seriously?..5 bucks?)
Since I'm in the middle of filing a lawsuit against my parents who're holding me hostage so i'll let you have my mother for free "No strings Attached!" but you'll have to convince my father.

You forget that you are on a public forum, and whether you like it or not, everything is analyzed for various reasons, you can't forbid anyone to do that. Such an approach has exposed your dirty business of deleting posts and reposting them when it suits you again.


The one who lies, usually steals, in your case engages in moral and unethical activities that may include things like buying posts - and those who produce posts often translate them into different languages and make money by selling the same content. I won't even mention promoting a scam-certified company, but people like you would sell their own mother for $5 if given the chance.

Oh, I've completely misunderstood. All these years I thought you were in to dirty talk, rather than shit posts. Lost in translation somewhere. We'll just have to stick to the in-person BDSM.

Stop! You're making me blush.

Reported posts have been deleted, SmokerFace still not banned, not sure if it's worth continuing but perhaps I will. Things we do for successful relationships...




Hmmm... haven't tried that, sounds kinky.

so "o_e_l_e_o" is flawless and you put them on a pedestal?

Everyone please, A big round of applause for Simp-moon of the year.

A tip for suchmoon: If you aren't having small fights with your girl then get ready to leave. (Beautiful DT1-DT2 ladies/girls/gals do you something else for our simpmoon to help them advance their career with females)

I have. It's utterly lacking in shitposts. I'm afraid the S&M relationship via mod reports is not going to work out between us.

This is outrageous! Suchie, why have you never dug up my profile?

1st I don't expect anything else from the retards like muchmoon to dig up profiles of people they want to be in a relationship with but are tired of getting rejected.

2nd.. Why do you want someone else to do the work that you find interesting...what have you done for those people in the first place??? or are looking for some pets?

Your posts are definitely better than the worst shitposters, but it's far from the quality you imagine. However, something is very easy to notice if we look at your post history - your posts are mostly 3 lines, with about the same number of characters. It's a clear pattern that shows you're producing posts for your signature campaign, but you're not intelligent enough to avoid more than obvious things.

In addition, I would not be surprised if these posts are not actually your work, but you use the services of those who write for others - it would be interesting if someone would check if there are identical posts translated into other languages.

That certainly helps for when you delete a post from previous weeks and then just make the exact same post again to farm those sweet scam payments.

What kinda BS is that? Posting literally takes less time than reading a topic and switching to an external editor. Or maybe you forgot the "reading" part and just spam generic shitposts.

Most of my posts are saved in notepad, I don't have time to click the post button everyday so I save them and spread my good words at the last moment.


Those posts are of High Quality and Not spam.
"if you read my posts" then you'll find they're of higher quality compared to yours.


So now you'll try to get a rule changed just for me?
Thank you for the LOVE muchMoon SuchGa...

"Scams are not moderated" is the rule that allows this garbage to continue while .

I have reported their 10 recent posts for being shitposts, will see how this goes.

If you read on the campaign thread [open] Restart of 1xBit signature campaign - new signatures and more spots! there's a rule "Spam, offtopic and posts in Bounty threads are not counted" it's clear spam but the manager/team still count for of his posts. Well we can't expect anything about this, if they're really not counting spam posts of their participants... obviously all of the participants already got removed. All the participants have nothing to lose since their account already got red tagged and can earn money by spamming.

wow, 17 posts in one day.
he also did it in a very short time.
how persistent is he posting for the scam campaign he is promoting?
I'm sure that in some signature campaigns managed by a good manager. he must have been removed from the list of participants.
is there no prohibition for a user like him?

Look at this shitstain still pooping out posts every 2 minutes:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/smokerface-880473

HAHAhahahahahaha. Whaaaaatt?

You were banned for plagiarizing! You defend Ratimov the proven plagiarizer because he leaves you positive trust! You question other users morals when your morals are bought with a positive trust rating? HAHAhahaha scumbag.

I found one more "https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17752869"
User: Sponsoredby15
They used same addresses " 37sKu6AvJveFDH6pBSFKVB8DeNwR5PVHtk  "

Edit: Prettygirl01315 also connected with Sponsoredby15 "https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16879433"

---

Something Special I found: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17186132
Accounts connected: Prettygirl01315, yueno, Sponsoredby15, MWesterweele, uwichii, Kalder699, marcuslong, Achargeturry78, Docnaster

---

Still not much of proof.
I tried to find a connection between parodium and these accounts but unable to gather proof that these accounts are owned by parodium.

Yes, it probably doesn't have an original owner. Look at this accusation.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17186132


And after that, we see the same picture. The account offers itself as collateral.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17951246

Further, the style of speech changes. Previously, the owner was from the Philippines and had poor English. But in March 2018, English changes, and most interestingly, wallet numbers are also edited on the same day, March 24, 2018.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/spectre-social-media-campaign-1680832
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitsler-signature-avatar-campaign-closing-friday-1589966
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/twitter-campign-vdice-crowdsale-closed-1645630
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-mbit-casino-signature-campaign-00008-btcpost-sr-members-1661862


But DarkStar quotes the message, and we see which address was hidden.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16731559

I will not say 100 percent, but whoever reads the posts of Parodium, will find a special similarity to what Docnaster writes.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52750820

And today I can say that Docnaster is evading the ban, even though he is not active at this time.

Ban evasion.
Prettygirl01315 Autoban user
Docnaster

I found 1 user connected with this address- 1FWQ7Nk9e8GDw1FfwTDeTekSPgGNLPxFTx

And what a coincedence-
Both Parodium and spiker777 also participated in BQT signature campaigns along with Docnaster- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.46111762

So, Docnaster is certainly alt of spiker777?

I'm not very good at it, but as you can see, these two accounts have a connection.

https://blockchair.com/ru/bitcoin/address/1Jyj8t4hLzgbiVLmmbWMRhdo31QGQK415x


https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=15fcShqXe4bXrEvAB52swsYAMWMvnfoAP7

They have exchanged feedback also.

So this happened a week or two before the posts being edited:

https://archive.is/MBbOU#selection-100012.0-100012.3

Yeah that part is weird.

Edit - got the original address, and the edits were indeed replacing the address.

http://web.archive.org/web/20170717185337/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1935179.0;all


Which according to this is linked to a banned account.

To recap: Parodium acquires spiker777 account in December 2017, for some inexplicable reason scrubs the account's address from campaign application posts and replaces it with his own one (instead of e.g. just deleting the posts), then in January 2019 spiker777's original owner (or alt or whatever) boy130 gets permabanned. At least that's what I think happened. So replacing the address probably saved spiker777 account from ban evasion.

There was a recent case by user "Scodnara" thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5286871
I think why would someone change their address with parodium's? It's likely to defame parodium or parodium stupid enough to use the same address of his by editing there.(I doubt this being the case)

May be to defame Parodium for some personal issue? Just saying but I don't think both accounts can be owned by a single person.
Unfortunately, there's no older archive of both threads where spiker777 has posted the address. Well, I'm a little bit surprised to see the Dao.Casino (one campaign where spiker777 applied) signature thread archived in 2020 while the thread was posted in 2017.

Perhaps this account also wanted to pledge the account.


 But Gunthar turned him down. Maybe someone else helped him with this.
But later, the same person again signs the message, but from a different account.

[ archive ]

Here is the one who helped and accepted this account, and changed all the addresses. And here the question is, where did Parodium get this address? Maybe he owns it?

On the other hand... that's still weird. Why would he do that? So that it's accidentally discovered three years later? But the posts are obviously edited, so it's not proof of anything. It's almost like he was trying to scrub all application posts (it's not only those two posts, there are a few more, all edited) to remove some other address. Would be interesting to dig up some archives and find if it was really the address that was edited, and what the original address was.

And why replace it with an address of another user? So a couple more possibilities:

• Parodium acquired spiker777 account around that time.
• spiker777 acquired Parodium account around that time.

It seems like that and this is what I think too. spiker777 has posted this address (I doubt, he edited actually) on March 18, 2017 but the address has been used on 01/01/2018 for the first time and after few days, on 11th January 2018, spiker777 have added both of his posts. I would say all these are a set up.

spiker777's posts have been edited after Parodium posted that address (not after, I misread the dates; still very suspicious that all posts mentioning that address were edited in January 2018). Could be a setup.

I looked at the Parodium account. And considering that he himself writes that he is a native Briton who knows Romanian.

 It turns out that he also owns an account that previously belonged to a Russian-speaking person who speaks Polish.

[ archive ]

[ archive ]

[ archive ]

[ archive ]


Either Parodium is a polyglot, or somewhere disingenuous, in that it does not leave the accounts of defaulters for itself.

The thread of loan was updated on 9 Nov 2020 to canceled (http://prntscr.com/10fi1u8) maybe this is the time when the new account owner started posting on that account.
Coming to the password, Which was initially changed on 15/8/2018 and parodium said after some months loan was paid then the next password change was on 19/11/2018(i think this is when the original owner changed the password).
I also think after getting the account back it was sold again on or off the forum.
Smokerface seemed in need to be in a campaign and was trying hard to be in but I can't find parodium trying as hard as smokerface with his account so I don't think pardoium is smokerface.
If smokerface is parodium then he would want most or all of his accounts to be in some campaign or at least try to but this doesn't seem to be the case.

The history of "Smokerface's" trying to sell the account should also be taken into consideration which is why tags should remain.
Edit: SmokerFace should have no problem trying to sign a message from his old address to prove his ownership.

I'm sorry, but I'm having a hard time believing this, maybe I'm just being overly skeptical and cynical, but just being honest.


The last password change was two years before the account woke up, which brings up the question; why would someone repay a loan to retrieve the account and not use it?  

There are too many strange things about the loan, and whether it was paid off or not.  Not the least of strange things is the fact that Parodium deleted his messages in loan request thread.  If he was afraid of losing his funds he would want those posts there as proof that his loan was defaulted.  The only reason to delete those posts is the hide the fact that a loan was given.  Also, SmokerFace deleted the text of the OP of the loan request thread.  Only a scammer would get a loan and then delete the text of the request.  Or, someone trying to hide the fact that a loan was given...

Another strange thing about the excuse given by Parodium; no reviews were left for the transaction, good, bad, or indifferent.  If the loan wasn't paid, but had to be "worked-off" why wouldn't Parodium leave a neutral review to warn other lenders?

In my opinion the most likely scenario is that Parodium still has control of the account, and tried to use it to recoup his lost funds.  I have no proof, of course, but something doesn't smell right about all this.  

Thx, you intentionally wrote this big reply to get merits, didn't you?  


So you agree I didn't break any rules disregarding our beliefs!



Just because I didn't try to sell my account after coming back means the account is already sold? GJ Sherlock, great logic you got there.

I also read all of SmokerFace's posts, and not only his but also his viola. There all the time he wants the task of taking a loan from someone and also advises everyone to buy accounts with which it will be easier to make money on the forum. I can say that when you read messages in a row, you get some impression about the person. And I doubt that the one who campaigned for the purchase of forum accounts so much and was in great need of money never bought or did not seek to sell his account. Therefore, I agree with the Coolcryptovator tag, the SmokerFace account has changed ownership.

Your english is far better than your other posts and compared to 2017 posts you've achieved a lot.
I have a gut feeling that if you continued posting the way you're posting in this thread -which is constructive and good for readers then you would've earned merits and ranked up quite easily but copying and pasting previous posts while inside a campaign doesn't make a good impression.

---

I've gone through your replies and I've come to conclusion -you shouldn't post if you can't but you kept posting previous replies of yours which is unethical.
Even though there were no rules like you said and i agree with you but you should've kept your moral compass straight thinking about the company you're working for.

So you think someone's English can't improve in a span of 2-3 years?, I'm a non native English speaker that took grammar classes, still learning.


The account didn't change hands people here tags someone so easily without any valid proof,, I wouldn't have paid the previous loan by working if i wanted to sell this account.
But Nah doesn't matter I'm off explaining hf playing DT games.

Isn't bending the rules is just a borderline breaking the rules, a good loophole doesn't need to bend the rules, it needs to look like it complies with the rule but at the same time the authorities can't see any problems that might raise some flags. I mean if you didn't met the minimum, why not just accept that you can't reach the minimum posts and move on. Doing it once or twice could work but doing it all the time will raise some suspicions.

The account is question inactive since April 25, 2017, 04:20:45 PM. So it's not worth even tag that user, but I believe that account also changed hands somehow. Because all the related accounts came from account farmer based on your presented evidence. I think more alts would be revealed by deep investigation.

So, the account wasn't sold by you. But I quite curious why you had deleted all the related replies there and the main thread's contents have been cleared.

Anyway, the account changed hand, that's the main fact, no matter how.

From what I can recall this account was returned to the owner several months after the loan was taken. The user could not pay so completed some writing work for me instead.

I do not know what happened once he got his account back, but can assume it changed hands given the change in writing style/purpose.

He had a Newbie account that was selling the senior's account.
The Pharmacist tagged that account, but most likely the account was sold anyway.

https://ninjastic.space/addresses?address=1HcG5aVavjaaeJ6aNkgvUmo6uz3WwtEVoK

There is also another account owned by SmokerFace

[ archive ]

[ archive ]

Stalker22 reported this.https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56449754

It's confirmed account changed hand. Because Parodium had been tried to prevent a red tag from that account.

That's the reason why Parodium has deleted his replies. At the same time, SmokerFace (Parodium) edited the thread as well. But by mistake, he edits the title with canceled, how a deal would be canceled after the deal is done? Parodium deleted all posts simply means the original owner of SmokerFace defaulted the lent amount. Simply means it's just was an account sell at the end.

Anyway, hope Parodium would clear the story behind it.

The worst part is that anyone who tries to explain to SmokerFace that he broke the rules will go unheard. This person has his own set of rules and his own truth. And it is useless to prove something to him. One can only guess how he lives in real life, adjusting his "truth" for everyone around him.
Lack of morality and decency, as well as poor mind for writing new posts, that's the whole characteristic of SmokerFace.  Unfortunately, he does not understand that everything in life comes back like a boomerang. He can only be pitied for his paucity of thinking.

dkbit98 already hinted here that this account might have changed hands.


The posts in english also differ a bit as far as I can judge, i.e. in 2017/2018 it sounded like a non-native person, but the latest posts read native (for me).

Here's something interesting that I found:

On August 15, 2018 SmokerFace requested a loan which was apparently filled by Parodium, who held the SmokerFace account as collateral.

Thread link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/canceled-4898988
Archive: https://archive.md/r5MhZ

But, for some reason, Parodium deleted his responses to that thread.  Others had quoted them before they were deleted, here're the quotes:



Well, someone did tag the account; user Loan Shark did, using this post (in the loan request thread) as reference:


The SmokerFace account stopped posting on the same date that the loan was granted, and didn't for over two years.  Bpip shows these security log entries for SmokerFace:


It appears that Parodium had control of the account for some time.  Prior to the loan SmokerFace used to post in the Filipino board regularly, but has not since his return.  It's also worth noting that Parodium doesn't, and never has posted in Filipino board, as far as I can tell.

This all brings up some questions: Is the account still in Parodium's possession?  Did the account get returned to the original owner?  Was the account sold by Parodium?

I'm not talking about some nebulous "quality". Rule #1:


Re-posting adds zero value and is pointless.

There were no low quality posts just recycling of content.
I would not have done it if there were rules regarding recycling same as how i don't plagiarize because it's against rules.


I didn't get greedy just easy money without any harm to rules, that's all. You cannot say I wanted BTC for nothing that was my content after all.

I'm pretty sure McDonald's don't make new employees sign a piece of paper which says "I will not spit in the food"; the absence of a specific rule is not tacit approval of such an act.

Regardless, the campaign does enforce the following two rules:
No unbiased person can possibly argue that deleting and reposting the same content multiple times is either constructive or not spam.

I love it. "No one specifically wrote do not copy delete and repost my "work", so I've been wronged". Oh this forum it's a gem that keeps on giving.

You're right there was no rule, but what always existed was professional standards, seeing as you see this as work and not just a benefit to engaging within the forum. So given that companies can see that you don't even feel responsible for leaving posts up for the duration of the campaign when paid for it, I imagine you're out of work. This problem has sorted itself out with a precedent instead of a rule, amazing.

You got greedy and wanted BTC for doing nothing and felt you were entitled to it. I would support any flag created by a company that you advertised for and did this to.

There are forum rules against low value posts and re-posting the same stuff is a low/zero value contribution to the forum. Hopefully now with a documented and confirmed case it will be easier for mods to deal with you if you continue this.

I didn't break any rules that is what matters here, If you go fly making rules on the go case by the base then everyone can be proven wrong.
I understand that's a small amount of money and wasn't worthy of my full time even i wasn't enjoying that money so I'll happily agree with you on that point that was the whole point of me copy pasting the posts.


Those are your beliefs and they don't belong to me.

Thx

Well, there is also something called common sense, not everything has to be excluded by rules.

What I don't understand is how people like you can enjoy that money (even if it's no fortune) and generally have no problem doing this ?! I would feel super bad and couldn't enjoy that money, because a) I don't deserve that money b) it's super unfair towards the other participants who do take the time and effort to make their minimum posts every week, while they surely have better things to do as well and c) I would question myself how low I have gotten, if I need to do this.

But I give you credit for showing up here, I like that.

It's the same work and it's not written you cannot hand over your last week's work.

You're paid to do a job, not to hand in your last week's work over and over again.

I didn't plagiarize, just tried to bend the rules because I was not able to complete a minimum(15) Posts.
I found a good loophole in the campaign since there was no rule regarding this and even not on the forum they have such a rule so i thought i should keep it that way rather than writing a post and could focus on other works.

I didn't mean to cheat and i don't think it's cheating since I copy pasted my own posts for 2 weeks and there was no such rule on the forum that you cannot copy paste your own posts neither it was on the campaign.
If you call it cheating then you could've added a rule that "Users cannot copy-paste their own posts after week's end"

I don't get how they are plagiarizing their posts when you can easily post your own thoughts and you might even be able to formulate a better opinion. I despise this kind of people who take advantage that there is only enough moderator to monitor post and steal the words of other people, I don't get why they do it but being in a signature campaign is good thing because you get paid for your opinion and there are people/users that are stealing others words is really saying something about the person.

Thanks to all those that took out time to write me in my DM bringing my attention to this situation, thanks to the OP for his observation and also big thanks to those that contributed in making the accusations more valid. I have taken a decision and this is final. The accused will be punished with both him losing his slot in the campaign and also getting a red feedback from me.

Reason for my tagged is due to the dishonesty displayed by the accused in him trying to abuse the forum and cheating the campaign, the attitude displayed by him is uncalled-for therefore 777coin as a brand on the forum would seize to have anything to do with him.

Ps: SmokerFace added to Blacklist (BrainLess List).

I think the best thing for any user to do when they prolly get busier IRL and can't make posts on the forum should be to willingly leave their signature campaign, explain to the CM their present situation, so that in the future they could still be accepted by the said manager, and then face squarely whatever is keeping them busy IRL. Periods of inactivity isn't bad, one can always make a return to the forum whenever things clear up, but deleting, and recycling previously paid posts to be paid for it over and again is plain avarice, cheating the campaign/company, playing on the campaign manager as well as everything dishonest.

I guess you are referring to taiwww.

19 posts in 2 minutes and 1 second!
taiwww made 1 post in every 6.4 seconds on average.

taiwww's post history (Archived.)

Nah, I don't think that's even close to a forum record.  I recall an old-timer (sort of) member getting heat for posting up a storm, and if I recall he'd said he wrote some of his posts in advance or just wrote very quickly or whatever.  Wish I could remember the member's name.

Anyway, as long as campaigns don't go by your total post count this is going to be an easy way for very lazy members to abuse the privilege of being in a campaign and as Leo pointed out it's certainly not unusual behavior--it's just another way for people who lack any motivation to write to continue to get paid for writing.  Crazy.

I would definitely point this out to the campaign manager whenever someone catches a member doing this, because even though it might not be against the rules it certainly is bending them to the point where it might as well be broken.

That's not a bad idea either.  It's a good one, in fact.

Better link: https://loyce.club/archive/details/topic_5303201.html

I think there was a similar case previously I heard, so it's not new on the forum. This is one of very bad behavior for campaign participants. It's not very easy to detect for a manager, so it would be very helpful if you create a thread and forward the manager to take a look. So that participants would be kicked from the campaign.

Yea, I second that. It would be a nice solution for such users. I do not recommend a red tag since there are no such rules on the campaign or forum. But I think the manager would add this rule now and punish is someone caught.

Report them to the manager, leave them a neutral tag explaining the situation. The campaign can and should then exclude them and if they so decide could probably flag them.

It's shady behaviour and if it's been done while in the same campaign, it could be enough for them to neg/flag the individual as they had already been paid for that post. Unless removed by moderators the post should remain with the accompanied advertising, that's the whole basis of the system.

Edit: I took the above action.

Here's some more evidence:

Post 1:
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5560/55605938.html - November 16
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5632/56320549.html - February 11
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5635/56358903.html - February 16
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5643/56433872.html - February 25

Post 2:
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5568/55686665.html - November 26
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5632/56320524.html - February 11
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5635/56358906.html - February 16
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5643/56433871.html - February 25

Post 3:
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5643/56433871.html - December 29
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5631/56313453.html - February 10
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5636/56368166.html - February 17
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5643/56433866.html - Feburary 25

This goes on and on in the exact same pattern for many more posts, but I think that is more than enough evidence for him to be banned from his signature campaign.

It would be a huge coincidence, if the mods always delete a good amount of his posts week after week And while they are surely shitposts, they are not the worst shitposts I have ever read, so no reason for the mods to be super strict just with this user.

Tbh I find this super cheeky, even worse than the worst shitposting ever to get paid some bucks from a signature campaign. Because some shitposters might not be bad people afterall or trying to earn easy money with minimalistic efforts - maybe they can't do any better for various reasons and are just looking to support their family/kids with it. But what SmokerFace does, is just plain cheating imo.


Thanks, I wasn't aware of this thread and looks like this is no cutting edge technique no more in here^^

It could be that moderators deleted some of his posts but making 15 posts in under 7 minutes it's probably new bitcointalk record if we don't count robots and bounty applications.

I can't prove anything but this is probably purchased account that changed ownership in 2018 and he started to write in the end of 2020 after two year break .
It would be interesting to see if he still speaks Pilipinas like he did in 2017, but with google translate I guess anyone can speak foreign languages.
Much harder for him to prove ownership of addresses he used in same year.

Not the first time I've seen a user do this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5283810

Unfortunately, it doesn't seem that mods will ban users for this behavior. You should alert the campaign manager in question though, as any half decent one will immediately kick this user from their campaign.

I read this post today and thought, hmm, I already read this post once in this thread, so was thinking about plagiarism:


archived

But it's not plagiarism. What this user actually does is to delete his old posts in a thread and then reposting them some days later to get paid again for them. Basically the same post was made on February 10th already, but was deleted (by him (?)):


archived

Posted already on Dec 26th: https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5593/55934821.html
Deleted and reposted on Feb 10th: https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5631/56313484.html
Deleted and reposted on Feb 17th: https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5636/56368162.html
And then today reposted again, after deleting the post from Feb 17th.