Pages:
Author

Topic: User Topparkeds scammed me for .15 BTC [PAID IN FULL!!] (Read 537 times)

legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
i admit i should of dealt with this differantly and take full responsiblilty. I have made 4 payments as of today and will have this fully paid off by this week. As a bonus i am sending owlcatz a unfunded lealana for the troubles on top of the balance

So why the F did you do this again to me??? - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2110155

TWICE NOW - SEND ME AN ADDRESS TO SEND YOUR 14 DOLLARS BACK TO OR I'M DONATING IT TO CHARITY!!!



update - he sent me this address today - 3H2Nksu36mbwNW2rWQVxioWpFgx5YrxEVa, to which I returned his coins, and I paid the tx fee as well... Roll Eyes

https://blockchain.info/tx/ef09573fc455a964ec411dd70b56e7b0508d5ac7eb1525c88d3d3bd4eb4d51c5

We are done here. this user is banned from my auctions. Stop coming back with alts, we'll figure you out fast there bud...

/DONE
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
Actually posting the dox of people you have obtained via non-public information is not allowed here. In order to publish someone's dox, you must have obtained said information via public sources.

You seem to be making this up. Not to mention that you haven't been following that rule yourself.


Bingo! Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
Actually posting the dox of people you have obtained via non-public information is not allowed here. In order to publish someone's dox, you must have obtained said information via public sources.

You seem to be making this up. Not to mention that you haven't been following that rule yourself.
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
Thanks, this debt has been fully paid. If people can kindly remove the red from toppparked's account, would be appreciated. Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374

I Have this users doxx (Name and full address, other info as needed).
Actually posting the dox of people you have obtained via non-public information is not allowed here. In order to publish someone's dox, you must have obtained said information via public sources.

It is weird that you trusted a newbie with over $2,000. This is literally the opposite behavior that I would expect of any experienced trader. I don't like it when someone fails to honor their obligations, even when they are scamming someone who is part of an extortion conspiracy, but you have to use a little bit of common sense to protect yourself.

Always use escrow.  Wink
Bingo!
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 6194
Meh.
i admit i should of dealt with this differantly and take full responsiblilty. I have made 4 payments as of today and will have this fully paid off by this week. As a bonus i am sending owlcatz a unfunded lealana for the troubles on top of the balance

Always be honest even if it hurts, lies are hard to keep track of and you can get easily tangled up in shit.. I'm waiting for owlcatz to confirm this and hopefully he will get the full payment for the coin. Once that is done I will change my Negative to a Neutral rating on your profile, but only when and if owlcatz has confirmed.
newbie
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
i admit i should of dealt with this differantly and take full responsiblilty. I have made 4 payments as of today and will have this fully paid off by this week. As a bonus i am sending owlcatz a unfunded lealana for the troubles on top of the balance
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1001
Always use escrow.  Wink

Nah, fuck off, sausage kid - you help scammers like Quickseller scam people in your escrow thread. Congrats on that, genius move!  Roll Eyes
If that buyer is not yet serving you with money then go forth and dox him, here is no use of rattling around.
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
Always use escrow.  Wink

Nah, fuck off, sausage kid - you help scammers like Quickseller scam people in your escrow thread. Congrats on that, genius move!  Roll Eyes
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Always use escrow.  Wink
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
Nah I hear ya bud, but I wanted to cash some out before it went below 9k.

And yeah, this is what happens when you are not careful - That said, I'm never shipping anything again until I'm paid in full - In this case, there were no problems before and I certainly didn't expect any this time, he was perfectly nice and honest before. I think he just didn't mean to win. I agree he should have just said that, or at least replied on this thread. He was on this AM, I talked to him briefly.

No explanation as to why such smaller amounts. but I will take what I can get at this point. I'm a quarter of the way there, that was a really nice coin too! Tongue

He has at least apologized for not staying in touch - I have been as nice as I can be, but this shit is a waste of my time. I have better things to do like make more $... Tongue
hero member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 753
Honestly, it sounds to me that he doesn't have the funds to cover the balance at the moment, which just means that he should not have bid on the coins in the first place if he didn't expect to win.

Given that it has now been a week and a half and the payment was not sent, I would consider that a violation of the auction, and regardless of whether he pays you in full or not, feel that the negative trust rating is still valid.

If he would have been forthcoming and just stated that he doesn't have the funds, rather than playing this nickel-and-dime game and disappearing act, I'm sure it would be easier to work out a fair deal. But because he has chosen to be non-responsive, I don't see why the negative rating would be removed, even if/after he pays in full.

Just my two.

Yep. It sure seems like that Topparkeds just doesn't have the money to afford to buy the item being auctioned for now which explains the fact that he disappeared then reappeared when there was a concern with his dox being made public. Even now, he is saying that he will repay partially instead of repaying with a lump sum all at once, which means that he probably never had the intention to pay on time in the beginning.

If he had just come out and said that he made a mistake, it would have been more acceptable.

But apparently he decided that just ignoring the thread for a couple of days without communication will be alright, which is definitely not the right way to handle this. That's why I said as well that he shouldn't be trusted, even if he pays back.

I agree with your assumptions - that's exactly how it seemed. I even told him he could just reject the package and I would send back the BTC.

What really gets me is that the price of BTC keeps falling, so I'm losing both TIME & $$$ here either way...  Roll Eyes

I'll update this tomorrow with any thing else. I just want my .15 back ffs.  Tongue

I don't think that you can do anything about BTC falling because the whole deal was in BTC. Oh well, we're all in the same boat here  Tongue
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
Honestly, it sounds to me that he doesn't have the funds to cover the balance at the moment, which just means that he should not have bid on the coins in the first place if he didn't expect to win.

Given that it has now been a week and a half and the payment was not sent, I would consider that a violation of the auction, and regardless of whether he pays you in full or not, feel that the negative trust rating is still valid.

If he would have been forthcoming and just stated that he doesn't have the funds, rather than playing this nickel-and-dime game and disappearing act, I'm sure it would be easier to work out a fair deal. But because he has chosen to be non-responsive, I don't see why the negative rating would be removed, even if/after he pays in full.

Just my two.

I agree with your assumptions - that's exactly how it seemed. I even told him he could just reject the package and I would send back the BTC.

What really gets me is that the price of BTC keeps falling, so I'm losing both TIME & $$$ here either way...  Roll Eyes

I'll update this tomorrow with any thing else. I just want my .15 back ffs.  Tongue
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 976
Honestly, it sounds to me that he doesn't have the funds to cover the balance at the moment, which just means that he should not have bid on the coins in the first place if he didn't expect to win.

Given that it has now been a week and a half and the payment was not sent, I would consider that a violation of the auction, and regardless of whether he pays you in full or not, feel that the negative trust rating is still valid.

If he would have been forthcoming and just stated that he doesn't have the funds, rather than playing this nickel-and-dime game and disappearing act, I'm sure it would be easier to work out a fair deal. But because he has chosen to be non-responsive, I don't see why the negative rating would be removed, even if/after he pays in full.

Just my two.
hero member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 753
Update - He got back online and pm'ed me. He claimed he would "send me btc this weekend". I will give him until after the weekend. Thanks

Shame its taken a dox threat and negative trust to get him to contact you what a loser Angry.

It actually took that AND a phone message to him. Roll Eyes

Wow some people are unbelievable especially as you had his address, fingers crossed you get your money Smiley.

I'm told he will be sending me .06 tomorrow. We shall see.

We'll see, it's a shame though that he has to be reminded that his dox will be rightfully released to the public if they don't pay. This guy probably wasn't going to pay back anything if you didn't have that dox. You should have his address as well because you shipped the item to him before he paid right?

This is just another case of escrow not being used/blindly trusting your trading partner. Shows that even high ranking users can make mistakes like this and it can be pretty costly.

BTW, did he give any ETA on when he'll send the rest of the funds(0.09 BTC that is)? Did he give any reason for sending his money in small chunks like this? Either way, he's not to be trusted even if he does pay back.
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
Update - He got back online and pm'ed me. He claimed he would "send me btc this weekend". I will give him until after the weekend. Thanks

Shame its taken a dox threat and negative trust to get him to contact you what a loser Angry.

It actually took that AND a phone message to him. Roll Eyes

Wow some people are unbelievable especially as you had his address, fingers crossed you get your money Smiley.

I'm told he will be sending me .06 tomorrow. We shall see.
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1077
Update - He got back online and pm'ed me. He claimed he would "send me btc this weekend". I will give him until after the weekend. Thanks

Shame its taken a dox threat and negative trust to get him to contact you what a loser Angry.

It actually took that AND a phone message to him. Roll Eyes

Wow some people are unbelievable especially as you had his address, fingers crossed you get your money Smiley.
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
Update - He got back online and pm'ed me. He claimed he would "send me btc this weekend". I will give him until after the weekend. Thanks

Shame its taken a dox threat and negative trust to get him to contact you what a loser Angry.

It actually took that AND a phone message to him. Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1077
Update - He got back online and pm'ed me. He claimed he would "send me btc this weekend". I will give him until after the weekend. Thanks

Shame its taken a dox threat and negative trust to get him to contact you what a loser Angry.
Pages:
Jump to: