I will leave the wisp of irony provided by the choice of example above, curfew, untouched and choose not to comment about it because well... if you can't see how that's a very bad example of "breaking rules", then I am questioning your understanding of how the world works.
So, moving on, the rules, specifically the one you pointed out above, I'll borrow decodx's words, read
the rules before you embarrass yourself further.
Mate, have you read anything I said.
I made an analogy, to how as time goes on and things evolve, the same rules will be a hinderence.
The only one embarrassing themselves is you,
as you represent meta win casino?
A casino like I said that has not improved the gambling market by a 1% margin.
The rules will continue to be broke, as long as they disable gamblers from generating a profit.
Next.
Like I said, I own the keys to the gambling market.
I will control it as I see fit.
Three things.
One, I urge you to
read the rule, carefully, before you further embarass yourself.
Two, I assume, within the fast minutes you take to rush into reply, just to be the last one in the room who speak, you haven't digest the post thoroughly. Have you at least understand that irony of curfew?
Three, and hopefully this will be my parting words, you can drop the arrogant-genius act, or if it's your true-self, I'll advise you to take it down several notch or hire someone else to be your spokeperson and/or handle marketing. Those arrogant know-it-all-master-of-the-universe-so-don't-you-dare-questioning-me had its trend back in 2018 during ICO hysteria, the cryptocommunity has seen enough of those arrogant "genius" and where their project ended. It no longer works. So, I'll advise you to drop it.
Not only it's not on trend anymore, it bring you the exact opposite effect of what you wanted. it will discourage people from bothering to touch your platform with one meter pole. Why would they? Most likely than not, they'll be concerned with their fund as they think an emotionally yet-to-be-stable and naive young adult will be the one handling it. The cryptocommunity has had its share of bitter rug-pull.
Series of questions that most likely will pop into their head when reading your thread is, "will this be a treatment I'm facing when I am playing on his platform? What if I'm having an issue? Will he answers to it professionally or... '
I own the keys to the gambling market. I will control it as I see fit.?"
That's the path you're threading right now with this whole attitude [I sincerely hope it's just a facade that can be dropped instantly instead of an inherent trait]. That's what they'll think instead of, "wow, this guy is so cool and confident, he must have know what he's doing."
Hopefully, you'll reach that point somewhere in the future where people can be so confident in you that you can walk into a room with this whole attitude of yours, but the time is yet to come. All it speaks right now, and quite loudly, is an uneducated person... or if I may be a bit offensive, an "uncultured swine".
An educated person who were raised well, and have their sight in the future of their project will know how to communicate with public. To summarize my last point: drop it, or take it down several notch. It doesn't do you any good.
You raise, correct assertations..
But you still do not understand.
My freedom of speech, comes before, my greed.
You can have 100 billion dollars in front of my face.
If it was a choice between my freedom of speech and the 100 billion dollars.
I would take the freedom of speech option.
If I am annoyed you will know.
It is not all an act.
Likewise, your last statement, was only 2 sentences, it took me less than 10 seconds to read your post...
What is there for me to digest?
I just thought your last 2 statements were stupid, and that you were overly trying to prove a point.
Before that I thought, you were at very minimum an open minded individual.
I understand what you are saying, but my friend, what I have is so powerful.
No matter what I do, it will still hit the statosphere. (With exception)
Like I said, it is not all an act, those are my actual thoughts you are hearing.
I am tired, of not being in my true form.
Phase 10My community should be able to say whatever the hell they want, whenever the hell they want!
[...]
Respect mates house, unless I have a million dollars for him and he doesn't believe me.
Likewise, I am going to break the rules, because new gambling technology calls for it.
This is normal, just like when you grow older, you no longer have a curfew.
For example, if the Unlimited Money Generator allows users to create their own lottery/trading/gambling/staking system/crypto market/casino.
Users should be able to advertise that creation in the bitcointalk forum.
How can users do this, if their is a specific rule stating, only one thread per website.
This rule must be broken.
I will leave the wisp of irony provided by the choice of example above, curfew, untouched and choose not to comment about it because well... if you can't see how that's a very bad example of "breaking rules", then I am questioning your understanding of how the world works.
So, moving on, the rules, specifically the one you pointed out above, I'll borrow decodx's words, read
the rules before you embarrass yourself further.
Likewise, I have read these rules before. Now that I have read them again, I have realized, I am actually not breaking any rules at all!
"Unless your thread is for a new site or is newsworthy (such as a you are hosting a whole new type of game on a site" - This is exactly what i'm referring to! Thanks Maged! Thanks
holydarkness!
Sorry for my immature ignorance!