FINMA make the rules and we follow and therefore we are - as you say - regulated by them. We have KYC & AML in place and comply with all the current regulations laid upon us by them. More importantly, we have never stated anywhere that are partners or have any kind of partnership with them, so please stay true to the facts here.
Wrong. You tell people to stay true to the facts while you are the one who is deciving investors by spreading incorrect information. See Finma regarding the "Regulatory treatment of initial coin offerings":
https://www.finma.ch/en/~/media/finma/dokumente/dokumentencenter/myfinma/4dokumentation/finma-aufsichtsmitteilungen/20170929-finma-aufsichtsmitteilung-04-2017.pdf?la=enUnder 2. Regulation:
ICOs are currently not governed by any specific regulation, either globally or in Switzerland.
and
Owing to the wide variety in structure of ICO models, FINMA can only carry out a conclusive regulatory assessment in specific cases.
Are you saying utrust is such a specific case and that FINMA carried out a conclusive regulatory assessment about utrust? Isn't it strange than that nobody of Finma, when contacted, was aware of you or your ICO? I am not surprised either, given that your company was just registered about a week ago. I wonder... under what company umbrella did you raise money during the pre-ICO? Can you please answer this.
This is not difficult to explain. Many ICOs that are located in Switzerland don't do KYC&AML and are not compliant to FINMA's regulations and therefore act in non-compliant manners. What this means for them in the future is anybody´s best guess.
Oh, and you think you're better than them? Again, you are talking about "FINMA's regulations" even though there are clearly NO REGULATIONS in regard to ICOs given by FINMA or anyone else at that point.
Please help me out: When I bought tokens during the pre-ICO, from whom did I purchased those tokens? What was the company and where was it registered? And more importantly, what happens now with my tokens since the ICO is under a different company under different terms and conditions that I did not agree on during the pre-ICO.
Uh? What does him doing some networking at some Fintech event have to do with Finma?