Topic: UTRUST - page 570. (Read 314264 times)
and can people withdraw fiat from platform direct?
I learn this project today and read the whitepaper, i have a question,how many fiat do the platform supports? and what the transfer fee ?
Agree, paypal needs competition. The key to success of this project will be getting merchants on board quickly and on going.
Its true future exchange is important and investors like to know if the team is already talking with some exchange. But when I see the support behind UTRUST, and how the project will have sucess, im sure that UTRUST will hit a lot of major exchanges.
The online payment facility platforms are ripe to see massive changes and right now Utrust can be at the center of these coming changes.
With the right team, am sure that Utrust can be the brand to compete in the coming months.
I am predicting that years from now Utrust can be worth billions of dollars.
Its true future exchange is important and investors like to know if the team is already talking with some exchange. But when I see the support behind UTRUST, and how the project will have sucess, im sure that UTRUST will hit a lot of major exchanges.
I am not so sure about that dude. You know I have also hear so many rumors and bad news about Poloniex, and that is also why i think the team wants this project to be listed in bittrex instead of Poloniex. Those rumors may be fake or not, but lets consider the investors when they heard such kind of news maybe they will react or had a bad feed back about the project. I agree that one of the factors that affects ones project was about the tokens being listed to some popular exchanges. There is nothing wrong on setting the bars high, besides it has the capability of being included to those exchanges.
Bittrex several months doesn't add new tokens (even popular).
It is rumored that they have considerably increased listing cost.
But listing at this exchange (or his absence) shouldn't affect prospects of such good project.
Exchange adds should also not be major goal of UTRUST. Let the team concentrate on the development.
I am not so sure about that dude. You know I have also hear so many rumors and bad news about Poloniex, and that is also why i think the team wants this project to be listed in bittrex instead of Poloniex. Those rumors may be fake or not, but lets consider the investors when they heard such kind of news maybe they will react or had a bad feed back about the project. I agree that one of the factors that affects ones project was about the tokens being listed to some popular exchanges. There is nothing wrong on setting the bars high, besides it has the capability of being included to those exchanges.
Bittrex several months doesn't add new tokens (even popular).
It is rumored that they have considerably increased listing cost.
But listing at this exchange (or his absence) shouldn't affect prospects of such good project.
Exchange adds should also not be major goal of UTRUST. Let the team concentrate on the development.
I am not so sure about that dude. You know I have also hear so many rumors and bad news about Poloniex, and that is also why i think the team wants this project to be listed in bittrex instead of Poloniex. Those rumors may be fake or not, but lets consider the investors when they heard such kind of news maybe they will react or had a bad feed back about the project. I agree that one of the factors that affects ones project was about the tokens being listed to some popular exchanges. There is nothing wrong on setting the bars high, besides it has the capability of being included to those exchanges.
Bittrex several months doesn't add new tokens (even popular).
It is rumored that they have considerably increased listing cost.
But listing at this exchange (or his absence) shouldn't affect prospects of such good project.
Exchange adds should also not be major goal of UTRUST. Let the team concentrate on the development.
I am not so sure about that dude. You know I have also hear so many rumors and bad news about Poloniex, and that is also why i think the team wants this project to be listed in bittrex instead of Poloniex. Those rumors may be fake or not, but lets consider the investors when they heard such kind of news maybe they will react or had a bad feed back about the project. I agree that one of the factors that affects ones project was about the tokens being listed to some popular exchanges. There is nothing wrong on setting the bars high, besides it has the capability of being included to those exchanges.
Bittrex several months doesn't add new tokens (even popular).
It is rumored that they have considerably increased listing cost.
But listing at this exchange (or his absence) shouldn't affect prospects of such good project.
Exchange adds should also not be major goal of UTRUST. Let the team concentrate on the development.
Bittrex has not added anyone for 2 months, so it will count on other exchanges. We expect in the near future 0x and Cybernetwork, and now on the etherdelta you can well pamp the price.
I wonder why is that bittrex list so few coins, it's not like people wouldn't pay a ton for listing, are they having some sort of quality control in play?
Bittrex has not added anyone for 2 months, so it will count on other exchanges. We expect in the near future 0x and Cybernetwork, and now on the etherdelta you can well pamp the price.
It's not time to discuss the exchange problem, you should discuss about the project that has not started ICO, it's still too early to talk exchange problems 
Bittrex has not added anyone for 2 months, so it will count on other exchanges. We expect in the near future 0x and Cybernetwork, and now on the etherdelta you can well pamp the price.
I am not so sure about that dude. You know I have also hear so many rumors and bad news about Poloniex, and that is also why i think the team wants this project to be listed in bittrex instead of Poloniex. Those rumors may be fake or not, but lets consider the investors when they heard such kind of news maybe they will react or had a bad feed back about the project. I agree that one of the factors that affects ones project was about the tokens being listed to some popular exchanges. There is nothing wrong on setting the bars high, besides it has the capability of being included to those exchanges.
Bittrex several months doesn't add new tokens (even popular).
It is rumored that they have considerably increased listing cost.
But listing at this exchange (or his absence) shouldn't affect prospects of such good project.
Exchange adds should also not be major goal of UTRUST. Let the team concentrate on the development.
Well, that's not the case.
There is a lot of works to do. The number of users and transaction has exponentially increased since March.
Moreover, they need to check every code in order to avoid previous mistakes made by others exchanges, allowing backdoors and lose of all the funds on the exchanges.
I am not so sure about that dude. You know I have also hear so many rumors and bad news about Poloniex, and that is also why i think the team wants this project to be listed in bittrex instead of Poloniex. Those rumors may be fake or not, but lets consider the investors when they heard such kind of news maybe they will react or had a bad feed back about the project. I agree that one of the factors that affects ones project was about the tokens being listed to some popular exchanges. There is nothing wrong on setting the bars high, besides it has the capability of being included to those exchanges.
Bittrex several months doesn't add new tokens (even popular).
It is rumored that they have considerably increased listing cost.
But listing at this exchange (or his absence) shouldn't affect prospects of such good project.
Exchange adds should also not be major goal of UTRUST. Let the team concentrate on the development.
I am not so sure about that dude. You know I have also hear so many rumors and bad news about Poloniex, and that is also why i think the team wants this project to be listed in bittrex instead of Poloniex. Those rumors may be fake or not, but lets consider the investors when they heard such kind of news maybe they will react or had a bad feed back about the project. I agree that one of the factors that affects ones project was about the tokens being listed to some popular exchanges. There is nothing wrong on setting the bars high, besides it has the capability of being included to those exchanges.
Bittrex several months doesn't add new tokens (even popular).
It is rumored that they have considerably increased listing cost.
But listing at this exchange (or his absence) shouldn't affect prospects of such good project.
Exchange adds should also not be major goal of UTRUST. Let the team concentrate on the development.
sure they will but cryptopia, hitbtc and others probably will definitely big potential!
I am not so sure about that dude. You know I have also hear so many rumors and bad news about Poloniex, and that is also why i think the team wants this project to be listed in bittrex instead of Poloniex. Those rumors may be fake or not, but lets consider the investors when they heard such kind of news maybe they will react or had a bad feed back about the project. I agree that one of the factors that affects ones project was about the tokens being listed to some popular exchanges. There is nothing wrong on setting the bars high, besides it has the capability of being included to those exchanges.
Bittrex several months doesn't add new tokens (even popular).
It is rumored that they have considerably increased listing cost.
But listing at this exchange (or his absence) shouldn't affect prospects of such good project.
Exchange adds should also not be major goal of UTRUST. Let the team concentrate on the development.
I am not so sure about that dude. You know I have also hear so many rumors and bad news about Poloniex, and that is also why i think the team wants this project to be listed in bittrex instead of Poloniex. Those rumors may be fake or not, but lets consider the investors when they heard such kind of news maybe they will react or had a bad feed back about the project. I agree that one of the factors that affects ones project was about the tokens being listed to some popular exchanges. There is nothing wrong on setting the bars high, besides it has the capability of being included to those exchanges.
Bittrex several months doesn't add new tokens (even popular).
It is rumored that they have considerably increased listing cost.
But listing at this exchange (or his absence) shouldn't affect prospects of such good project.
Exchange adds should also not be major goal of UTRUST. Let the team concentrate on the development.
China now bans BTC and renminbi reversal, if UTRRO can be converted into renminbi, that would be a huge market
Just to inform that Chinese exchanges are expected to be back by October. Guess what? A very bullish crypto and bitcoin coming up soon. And UTRUST is not actually just dependent on China. There are too many countries out there that are good crypto market like Europe, Australia, Japan, South Korea and India.
I think China will not want to lose influence in developing crypto-currencies. And soon the ICO starts on Neo.
China now bans BTC and renminbi reversal, if UTRRO can be converted into renminbi, that would be a huge market
Just to inform that Chinese exchanges are expected to be back by October. Guess what? A very bullish crypto and bitcoin coming up soon. And UTRUST is not actually just dependent on China. There are too many countries out there that are good crypto market like Europe, Australia, Japan, South Korea and India.
I heard something similar, that exchanges just need to make some regulation and registration process. Knowing the money they gained, I'm sure it will be easy for a lot of them ;
I would also like some sources on this, because i think exchanges are still out. The ICO ban was later worded as an ICO pause, so i do expect them to come back.
The team, payment protection, low seller fees, low or zero conversion fees etc ….
With the team of 15 developers they are more likely to bring the product in the market sooner than anyone else. The payment protection of physical and virtual goods will attract users. The immediate fiat conversion, low fees (1%) and payment in fiat will attract merchants. In my opinion utrust if far better in every sense compare to any other projects out there. This is my own opinion do your research. Either way I don’t care I am throwing 50 eth on it.
With the team of 15 developers they are more likely to bring the product in the market sooner than anyone else. The payment protection of physical and virtual goods will attract users. The immediate fiat conversion, low fees (1%) and payment in fiat will attract merchants. In my opinion utrust if far better in every sense compare to any other projects out there. This is my own opinion do your research. Either way I don’t care I am throwing 50 eth on it.
Looks pretty good indeed if they can become the PayPal of crypto, or the PayPal of everything. But there are some promises that have to be proven in practice, such as the arbitration system.
Isn't the arbitration system going to be a bottleneck as the number of transactions increase? Or will UTrust continue to hire support staff for that as Utrust scales up?
I vaguely remember from an old chat that they only need 7 million to create the platform. Rest of the money is for expansion of the team and hunting of the potential merchants.
Jump to: