This being said so much about the "so-called" ICO rating agencies that gave a high mark to this project. My perspective as of now about them and youtube shillers is no different than about televangelists.
So it`s not just this project per se as much as rating agencies that should be highly avoided. DYOR friends, listen to yourselves.
Dude 99% of projects have KYC nowdays. Yes, this is not a good, but this is a rule from SEC etc. And why thi is your "worst investments"? Price on ICO was 6.5 cent and now 11 cent. And they bucked by Portugal government.
https://twitter.com/UTRUST_Official/status/999999801747038209
I had no problem with KYC although SEC is maintaining ICO`s under US jurisdiction. This was labeled as being made in the Swiss canton of Zug and I laughed how KYC was poorly made as well as how Admin was removing users without warning. However, if KYC was required than regulations do exist in the country origin of this ICO. In that case, I will get my tokens one way or another.
I just hate to see UTRUST being so unprofessional and as I said before: rating agencies being even worse giving a mark to this token it doesn`t deserves.
Usually it's working as follow: hi admin, you'll get 5-10% of amount which we will raise if thanks to you we will reach our hard cap.