Pages:
Author

Topic: [v2][Self Moderated] In Merits, Count Down To Your Next Rank... - page 9. (Read 23902 times)

full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 131
RATING:⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
@Fivestar4everMVP, I saw full members just applying when they crossed 75 merits. For full members, 25 merits is a big amount. If they get this rank easily, then they will be discouraged from contributing to the forum. They should earn at least 90% merit before applying here. Above Full Member 25 is fine; that is in your current rules. That's the reason sometimes I ignore full members. I don't want to let them be lazy. I believe merit limits would be different for each rank.

My advice is below.
To apply here, applicants should have below-average merits according to ranks.

To Members: 9 Merits
To Full Members: 90 Merits
To Sr. Members: 225 Merits
To Hero Members: 450 merits
To Legendary: 900 Merits

It's just my advice; maybe some +/- would be fine.


I have already proposed something similar here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63873169
However, it seems to me that even with such rules, the majority of users will ignore it and after two or three pages, we will again be overwhelmed with congratulations and unrealistic expectations from here when it comes to merit. Someone expects that he will get more merit here than he managed to earn natively.

Regarding the above bolded context.

Inasmuch as there's actually sense in what the poster said, first we need to be reminded that someone placing an application here doesn't really guarantee that they'll get the desired merits to rank up HERE, it's more of a 50/50 thing.

And then again, if someone has been able to earn up to 75 merits on his own, why should he feel lazy because he got help receiving 25 more merits ( from his merit worthy posts). Most of the applications here didn't get all their desired merits to rank up HERE. besides, the whole idea of this exercise isn't just about earning free merits to rank up I believe, it's more about making other to take a look at your posts, access them and merit whichever one they feel is worthy.

Again, getting to the next rank isn't supposed to be the final destination for a user, but a starting point to aim for greater height (next rank) Hence I see no reason why getting to the next rank would make them feel reluctant or stop contributing to the forum as they've been previously doing.
This is just my honest opinion on this, and I'm not saying this simply because I'm close to 75 merits as many would think, no, that's not it at all, because whether or not I send in an application here, I know fully well that I'll be able to earn the required number of merits for my rank up to FM rank.
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 292
My Countdown to Sr Member Rank
Number of Merit(s) left: 24
19 16
sr. member
Activity: 826
Merit: 460
My Countdown to Hero Member Rank
Number of Merit(s) left: 17
2

Hopefully I can get help to rank up

Thank you
-2 to hero rank Roll Eyes
full member
Activity: 189
Merit: 120
My Countdown to Full Member Rank
Number of Merit(s) left: 9 8  

Edit: Thanks to everyone for your help.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 442
I buy all valid country Gift cards swiftly.
Great advice and I think I should be on the consideration list and it’s not always easy earning this merits and with this I think I will have to drop my application and since I didn’t go through the entire thread, please pardon me if I’m missing out of the discussion.

My countdown to Hero Member
Number of Merits(s) left : 46. 36 35

This is still only a proposal and there was no significant discussion about it, I suppose that the OP should express his views more directly about it. Or the silence is a sign that he does not want to discuss it further. Everything is still based on goodwill and this initiative should not be seen as a kind of charity.
Yeah it’s actually based on goodwill and no one is entitled to any merit(s) on the thread and I think since the merit sending isn’t limited to just the op alone, then I think anyone who wants to help another member can decide to do so regardless of how many merits is left of the user and I also agree with you that, as the rank goes higher, then the merit requirement should be reduced and number of merits should be considered.
~Just my opinion ~
legendary
Activity: 3444
Merit: 3469
Crypto Swap Exchange
Great advice and I think I should be on the consideration list and it’s not always easy earning this merits and with this I think I will have to drop my application and since I didn’t go through the entire thread, please pardon me if I’m missing out of the discussion.

My countdown to Hero Member
Number of Merits(s) left : 46. 36 35

This is still only a proposal and there was no significant discussion about it, I suppose that the OP should express his views more directly about it. Or the silence is a sign that he does not want to discuss it further. Everything is still based on goodwill and this initiative should not be seen as a kind of charity.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 442
I buy all valid country Gift cards swiftly.

To Hero Members: 450 merits

It's just my advice; maybe some +/- would be fine.


Great advice and I think I should be on the consideration list and it’s not always easy earning this merits and with this I think I will have to drop my application and since I didn’t go through the entire thread, please pardon me if I’m missing out of the discussion.

My countdown to Hero Member
Number of Merits(s) left : 46. 36 35 31
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 254
[btc] or nothing more 📈💹 up we go
My countdown to Full Member Rank
Number of Merit(s) left: 3.



Hope I get some help from you guys thanks.
I have just given you the last 3 smerit I have, I hope you enjoy your new rank Best wishes.
full member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 212
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
My Countdown to Sr Member Rank
Number of Merit(s) left: 22 20 19 17 14
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 322
Trade Big, Win Bigger!
My Countdown to Senior Member Rank
Number of Merit(s) left: 25 18 17 15 12 4
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 421
My countdown to Hero Member rank
Number of merit(s) left : 25 23 1312

It has not been an easy task to this point but I will appreciate the push to hero member rank.

Thanks.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 285
My countdown to Sr Member rank
Number of merit(s) left : 20, 18, 16, 15
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 4554
Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing
The OP indeed said, new rules could be added and I think it's time for some new rules update on the OP by Fivestar4everMVP. This sort of thread is one that is sure to last a longer time as you would always find users within that circle of near archivements needing some boost. When it's undefined or within a large range, they've got to leverage it for chances. The rules from the OP remains,

It is mandatory that You must be less than 25 merits from next rank to make a count down post on this thread.

That's the official rule on OP.

Ww had yet another user who spread this out quite clearly, which agrees and someworth conforms to most of what has been the case on the thread, as far as applications go.
New rules for countdown which should strictly followed...

Junior member merit (+1-9) CD to Member
Member merits(75-99) CD to full member
Full member (225-249) to Sr Member Countdown
Sr Member (475-499) to Hero member
Hero member (975-999) to Legendary

But One shouldn't countdown before Activity reached.

Don't know if the OP had other versions to the rules in the comments as I can't possibly be going over some 35pager document right now but, having that updated on the OP would be a best approach. In the absence of none, every other user could just make suggestions and it would be seen as such but, it could be actioned within their capacity as The Cryptovator has rightly pointed out and lived up to.

That's the reason sometimes I ignore full members. I don't want to let them be lazy. I believe merit limits would be different for each rank.

My advice is below.
To apply here, applicants should have below-average merits according to ranks.

To Members: 9 Merits
To Full Members: 90 Merits
To Sr. Members: 225 Merits
To Hero Members: 450 merits
To Legendary: 900 Merits

It's just my advice; maybe some +/- would be fine.



Rules are meant to be fair, to level the planes between all peoples and ranks. Having that in mind, if I were to make a pick between  the existing rules and the suggestion from The Cryptovator, I think the 90% requirement is a more fair rule than the 25 lacking flats as we have it in the OP.

Given that, the total accumulations for each ranks differs and doubles as you go up the later and so is the difficulty in climbing, it's only normal to put everything in a ratio or percentage. Hence, the 90% requirement or the 10% lack to the next rank would be a better approach to equate all ranks.

Have in the OP and it seals the OP.

* Don't take it too personal for repeated posting, it's been hours inbetween and am using this to bump the thread for observation and responses. I hope the Fivestar4everMVP is been observant of the on going discussion.
The OP can tweak the rules as he sees fit, however, the rules need to be strict enough as to not encourage flat out begging or farming.

IMO this thread was meant to be a place where users were really close to the next rank and could ask for a little bump. It was not meant to be a thread where shitposters come to rank up their accounts so they can earn more money.

Ultimately managers decide whether or not to hire shitposters(some might give a shitposter a chance to see if they change, but they usually don't), but users should have to do most of the work themselves and show that they have put the effort it.

As you all see, I have refrained from helping in this thread for awhile now as it feels like we are just ranking up farms at this point. Soon as they hit the 25 threshold they are posting.
full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 106
The OP indeed said, new rules could be added and I think it's time for some new rules update on the OP by Fivestar4everMVP. This sort of thread is one that is sure to last a longer time as you would always find users within that circle of near archivements needing some boost. When it's undefined or within a large range, they've got to leverage it for chances. The rules from the OP remains,

It is mandatory that You must be less than 25 merits from next rank to make a count down post on this thread.

That's the official rule on OP.

Ww had yet another user who spread this out quite clearly, which agrees and someworth conforms to most of what has been the case on the thread, as far as applications go.
New rules for countdown which should strictly followed...

Junior member merit (+1-9) CD to Member
Member merits(75-99) CD to full member
Full member (225-249) to Sr Member Countdown
Sr Member (475-499) to Hero member
Hero member (975-999) to Legendary

But One shouldn't countdown before Activity reached.

Don't know if the OP had other versions to the rules in the comments as I can't possibly be going over some 35pager document right now but, having that updated on the OP would be a best approach. In the absence of none, every other user could just make suggestions and it would be seen as such but, it could be actioned within their capacity as The Cryptovator has rightly pointed out and lived up to.

That's the reason sometimes I ignore full members. I don't want to let them be lazy. I believe merit limits would be different for each rank.

My advice is below.
To apply here, applicants should have below-average merits according to ranks.

To Members: 9 Merits
To Full Members: 90 Merits
To Sr. Members: 225 Merits
To Hero Members: 450 merits
To Legendary: 900 Merits

It's just my advice; maybe some +/- would be fine.



Rules are meant to be fair, to level the planes between all peoples and ranks. Having that in mind, if I were to make a pick between  the existing rules and the suggestion from The Cryptovator, I think the 90% requirement is a more fair rule than the 25 lacking flats as we have it in the OP.

Given that, the total accumulations for each ranks differs and doubles as you go up the later and so is the difficulty in climbing, it's only normal to put everything in a ratio or percentage. Hence, the 90% requirement or the 10% lack to the next rank would be a better approach to equate all ranks.

Have in the OP and it seals the OP.

* Don't take it too personal for repeated posting, it's been hours inbetween and am using this to bump the thread for observation and responses. I hope the Fivestar4everMVP is been observant of the on going discussion.
full member
Activity: 203
Merit: 106
I have already proposed something similar here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63873169
However, it seems to me that even with such rules, the majority of users will ignore it and after two or three pages, we will again be overwhelmed with congratulations and unrealistic expectations from here when it comes to merit. Someone expects that he will get more merit here than he managed to earn natively.

Oh wow! You did make such suggestions! I didn’t catch sights of it neither will I blame the users who happened to have not followed through with your suggestion. I guess the more concerns here is, if it was adopted by the OP. That would have been a best move or approach towards handling this kind of situation and determine who gets to apply from who feels they should apply.

It’s a self moderated thread, anyone who faults the rules will be sure that, their post would be kicked out and could get themselves blacklisted with regards to this thread. Hence, if the OP adopts it, people will fall in line and the OP would do a lot more screening on what’s happening in the thread.
legendary
Activity: 3444
Merit: 3469
Crypto Swap Exchange
@Fivestar4everMVP, I saw full members just applying when they crossed 75 merits. For full members, 25 merits is a big amount. If they get this rank easily, then they will be discouraged from contributing to the forum. They should earn at least 90% merit before applying here. Above Full Member 25 is fine; that is in your current rules. That's the reason sometimes I ignore full members. I don't want to let them be lazy. I believe merit limits would be different for each rank.

My advice is below. 
To apply here, applicants should have below-average merits according to ranks.

To Members: 9 Merits
To Full Members: 90 Merits
To Sr. Members: 225 Merits
To Hero Members: 450 merits 
To Legendary: 900 Merits

It's just my advice; maybe some +/- would be fine. 


I have already proposed something similar here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63873169
However, it seems to me that even with such rules, the majority of users will ignore it and after two or three pages, we will again be overwhelmed with congratulations and unrealistic expectations from here when it comes to merit. Someone expects that he will get more merit here than he managed to earn natively.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 131
Better days are close
@Fivestar4everMVP, I saw full members just applying when they crossed 75 merits. For full members, 25 merits is a big amount. If they get this rank easily, then they will be discouraged from contributing to the forum. They should earn at least 90% merit before applying here. Above Full Member 25 is fine; that is in your current rules. That's the reason sometimes I ignore full members. I don't want to let them be lazy. I believe merit limits would be different for each rank.

My advice is below. 
To apply here, applicants should have below-average merits according to ranks.

To Members: 9 Merits
To Full Members: 90 Merits
To Sr. Members: 225 Merits
To Hero Members: 450 merits 
To Legendary: 900 Merits

It's just my advice; maybe some +/- would be fine. 


Am really greatful for your advice though I wasn't aware of this new rule that's was why I applied here for the first time since the rules has been listed down I hope others see it and follow according it to ones again thanks Cryptovator for helping users here get to their required rank.
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 387
but some users is not following this principle, some of them is applying to this thread for applying sack, I think is the high time to monitor applications of users that fail to follow this instruction, mostly members that have not gotten up nine [9] merits you see them applying for this thread even full members too, I don't even know if they don't use to read the content of the thread and also the terms and conditions of the thread if I'm not mistaken before they apply, I don't want to quote anybody in respect of these, before some of them will start saying that I don't nwant their growth, I like as you repost this terms and conditions so that they read and understand before applying.

The listed requirement above is just a suggestion that the cryptovator made, which I also agree with, but before now, the quote below was how the requirement looked, so if members who are in pursuit of full member rank applied with 75 merit before the new requirement, they are still not breaking any rules and shouldn't be considered as people that don't follow laws.

Quote
Junior member merit (+1-9) CD to Member
Member merits(75-99) CD to full member
Full member (225-249) to Sr Member Countdown
Sr Member (475-499) to Hero member
Hero member (975-999) to Legendary
full member
Activity: 189
Merit: 120
My Countdown to Full-Member Rank
Number of Merit(s) left: 22
Withdrawn according to the new rules… Will reapply when I get to 90+
member
Activity: 95
Merit: 30
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
My Countdown to  member rank
Number of Merit(s) left: 2
Pages:
Jump to: