Pages:
Author

Topic: vaccine campaigns ‘will be used for massive-scale depopulation: Former Pfizer VP - page 2. (Read 228 times)

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
^^^ Keep up the good trolling. You might make it to greedy-leader levels if you talk against the truth enough.

are you denying that yeadon is part of the "frontline"TM antivax group
are you denying that yeadon worked on treatment products related to asthma and not viruses

That's classified info, released on a need-to-know basis. And you don't need to know.

However, you know that you twist the points to use them to troll for Big Pharma and the medical. Have you made it into Management yet? Will they let you stop trolling for them once you make it there?

Cool
legendary
Activity: 4270
Merit: 4534
^^^ Keep up the good trolling. You might make it to greedy-leader levels if you talk against the truth enough.

are you denying that yeadon is part of the "frontline"TM antivax group
are you denying that yeadon worked on treatment products related to asthma and not viruses

ido not work for anyone. thats the beauty of bitcoin. im a early adopter of 2012 and been living happily without the need to seek out funds from others
im self sustained and independently wealthy(you jealous?)

your footer shows you advertise pharma products. so its you twisting things regarding your thoughts about pharma and trolling by having a flip flop hypocritical mantra
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
^^^ Keep up the good trolling. You might make it to greedy-leader levels if you talk against the truth enough.

 Cool
legendary
Activity: 4270
Merit: 4534
was wondering why the link had 'aflds' .... oh look its the antivax 'frontline' doctors that have not personally been virologists or immunologist working on covid..

oh look dr yeadon doesnt want to prevent people getting covid he wants to sell inhalers and pills as a 'treatment than may reduce symptoms'

has his treatments even been used or tested on covid......... nope. only asthma
and how weird it is that he wants to stop something that has gone through 9 months of testing on the exact thing it is found to help prevent.. just so he can sell his untested treatment that 'might' help in his opinion but not tested


you really got to laugh at the hypocrisy of the COVID-unexpereinced 'frontline doctors'
its like they dont want to prevent gunshots because they instead want to sell sutures and scalpels
its like they dont want to prevent car accidents they instead want to sell surgical tools and prosthetics


so if you want to cry about 'pharma profit' ask yourself the $3 per dose vaccine vs whatever product the antivax doctors promote
$6 per year vs ?? per year..
look at badeckers footnote listing multiple things. add up their yearly costs and see which side is profiting

oh and if you want to cry about safety standards. vaccines are atleast 1500x safer than getting covid
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
There are talks by professionals in medicine here and there, that show that the vaccine will produce sterility in those receiving it. The ability to have fun with the sex act will still be there. But the ability to get pregnant will be gone.

But we won't have it proven to us until the next baby-boom doesn't happen.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
It’s ‘entirely possible’ vaccine campaigns ‘will be used for massive-scale depopulation’: Former Pfizer VP

PLEASE warn every person not to go near top up vaccines. There is absolutely no need to them...If someone wished to harm or kill a significant proportion of the world’s population over the next few years, the systems being put in place right now will enable it. It’s my considered view that it is entirely possible that this will be used for massive-scale depopulation', Dr Mike Yeadon told the American Frontline Doctors

Dr. Yeadon said: “I’m well aware of the global crimes against humanity being perpetrated against a large proportion of the world’s population.

“I feel great fear, but I’m not deterred from giving expert testimony to multiple groups of able lawyers like Rocco Galati in Canada and Reiner Fuellmich in Germany.

“I have absolutely no doubt that we are in the presence of evil (not a determination I’ve ever made before in a 40-year research career) and dangerous products.

“In the U.K., it’s abundantly clear that the authorities are bent on a course which will result in administering ‘vaccines’ to as many of the population as they can. This is madness, because even if these agents were legitimate, protection is needed only by those at notably elevated risk of death from the virus. In those people, there might even be an argument that the risks are worth bearing. And there definitely are risks which are what I call ‘mechanistic’: inbuilt in the way they work.

“But all the other people, those in good health and younger than 60 years, perhaps a little older, they don’t perish from the virus. In this large group, it’s wholly unethical to administer something novel and for which the potential for unwanted effects after a few months is completely uncharacterized.

“In no other era would it be wise to do what is stated as the intention.

“Since I know this with certainty, and I know those driving it know this too, we have to enquire: What is their motive?

“While I don’t know, I have strong theoretical answers, only one of which relates to money and that motive doesn’t work, because the same quantum can be arrived at by doubling the unit cost and giving the agent to half as many people. Dilemma solved. So it’s something else. Appreciating that, by entire population, it is also intended that minor children and eventually babies are to be included in the net, and that’s what I interpret to be an evil act.

“There is no medical rationale for it. Knowing as I do that the design of these ‘vaccines’ results, in the expression in the bodies of recipients, expression of the spike protein, which has adverse biological effects of its own which, in some people, are harmful (initiating blood coagulation and activating the immune ‘complement system’), I’m determined to point out that those not at risk from this virus should not be exposed to the risk of unwanted effects from these agents.”

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/former-pfizer-vp-to-aflds-entirely-possible-this-will-be-used-for-massive-scale-depopulation


Former Pfizer VP: ‘Your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death.’

Look out the window, and think, “why is my government lying to me about something so fundamental?” Because, I think the answer is, they are going to kill you using this method. They’re going to kill you and your family.’

He addressed the “demonstrably false” propaganda from governments in response to COVID-19, including the “lie” of dangerous variants, the totalitarian potential for “vaccine passports,” and the strong possibility we are dealing with a “conspiracy” which could lead to something far beyond the carnage experienced in the wars and massacres of the 20th century

His main points included:

There is “no possibility” current variants of COVID-19 will escape immunity. It is “just a lie.”

Yet, governments around the world are repeating this lie, indicating that we are witnessing not just “convergent opportunism,” but a “conspiracy.” Meanwhile media outlets and Big Tech platforms are committed to the same propaganda and the censorship of the truth.

Pharmaceutical companies have already begun to develop unneeded “top-up” (“booster”) vaccines for the “variants.” The companies are planning to manufacture billions of vials, in addition to the current experimental COVID-19 “vaccine” campaign.

Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, have announced that since these “top-up” vaccines will be so similar to the prior injections which were approved for emergency use authorization, drug companies will not be required to “perform any clinical safety studies.”

Thus, this virtually means that design and implementation of repeated and coerced mRNA vaccines “go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, [injecting] some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.”

Why are they doing this? Since no benign reason is apparent, the use of vaccine passports along with a “banking reset” could issue in a totalitarianism unlike the world has ever seen. Recalling the evil of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, “mass depopulation” remains a logical outcome.

The fact that this at least could be true means everyone must “fight like crazy to make sure that system never forms.”

“And if you wanted to introduce a characteristic which could be harmful and could even be lethal, and you can even tune it to say ‘let’s put it in some gene that will cause liver injury over a nine-month period,’ or, cause your kidneys to fail but not until you encounter this kind of organism [that would be quite possible]. Biotechnology provides you with limitless ways, frankly, to injure or kill billions of people.

“And since I can’t think of a benign explanation for any of the steps: variants, top-up vaccines, no regulatory studies… it’s not only that I cannot think of a benign explanation, the steps described, and the scenario described, and the necessary sort of resolution to this false problem is going to allow what I just described: unknown, and unnecessary gene sequences injected into the arms of potentially billions of people for no reason.

“I’m very worried … that pathway will be used for mass depopulation, because I can’t think of any benign explanation.”

“The most different variant is only 0.3% different from the original sequence as emailed out of Wuhan in … January 2020. 0.3% [is] the one [variant] that is the most different on the planet so far. And now another way of saying it is, ‘all of the variants are not less than 99.7% identical to each other.’

“Now, you might be thinking, ‘hmm, .3%, is that enough [to escape immunity and become more dangerous]?’ The answer is no.

And, so, the idea that 0.3% could even have a chance of getting around immunity is just a lie. It’s not [even] like an opinion difference.

“I don’t think 3% would be enough. That’s 10 times more variation than has occurred in 16 months [with this virus]. I don’t even think 30% difference would be enough. So, I’m saying that 100 times more variation than has actually happened, would still leave me putting a big bet on the human immune system not being fooled that these are new pathogens.

“I’ve chatted this over with several professors of immunology and they agreed with me, it’s like, ‘why are you asking me this?’

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/exclusive-former-pfizer-vp-your-government-is-lying-to-you-in-a-way-that-could-lead-to-your-death




I wasn’t going to get the jab anyway but this is quite a read..
Pages:
Jump to: