Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] - page 188.

samr7

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 430

Firstbits: 1samr7

Quote from: brendio on July 08, 2011, 05:05:58 AM

I just tried running the windows binary, but get the error "vanitygen.exe - Entry Point Not Found; The procedure entry point GetActiveProcessorCount could not be located in the dynamic link library KERNEL32.dll"

Am I missing a dependency?

Yep, you were missing a major dependency: Windows 7. Cheesy

Sorry about that. Version 0.7 is up now, and has been tested on XP SP3.

brendio

hero member

Activity: 518

Merit: 500

I just tried running the windows binary, but get the error "vanitygen.exe - Entry Point Not Found; The procedure entry point GetActiveProcessorCount could not be located in the dynamic link library KERNEL32.dll"

Am I missing a dependency?

SgtSpike

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1005

Quote from: samr7 on July 08, 2011, 03:02:07 AM

Quote from: SgtSpike on July 08, 2011, 02:13:11 AM

New error. Cheesy

Quote

Could not add prefix '1worLd': overlapping?

I get this for a good number of targets. Can't see a particular pattern to the ones that error out, and they are only in the list once...

New version 0.6 is now up. This version should be more specific about which prefixes it thinks overlap each other. Try it out and let me know what you find.

Thanks, that definitely helps! I just didn't understand what the error meant, but this makes it crystal clear.

samr7

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 430

Firstbits: 1samr7

Quote from: SgtSpike on July 08, 2011, 02:13:11 AM

New error. Cheesy

Quote

Could not add prefix '1worLd': overlapping?

I get this for a good number of targets. Can't see a particular pattern to the ones that error out, and they are only in the list once...

New version 0.6 is now up. This version should be more specific about which prefixes it thinks overlap each other. Try it out and let me know what you find.

SgtSpike

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1005

New error. Cheesy

Quote

Could not add prefix '1worLd': overlapping?

I get this for a good number of targets. Can't see a particular pattern to the ones that error out, and they are only in the list once...

samr7

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 430

Firstbits: 1samr7

Quote from: kseistrup on July 07, 2011, 12:03:55 PM

The source code in the original article doesn't seem to be complete, where can I download the full .c file? Please put it on github or a dropbox or something.

Oh my, the forum truncated that post and left the code tag open. Sorry about that, the source code is up on github now, and pastebin.

SgtSpike

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1005

Quote from: dserrano5 on July 07, 2011, 01:15:04 PM

Quote from: SgtSpike on July 07, 2011, 11:12:10 AM

Can results be logged to a text file?

Add '> file' to the command line. The greater-than character means "redirect output to file".

Quote from: SgtSpike on July 07, 2011, 11:38:39 AM

It can. The -r switch was the trick.

I assumed you were using it

.

Thanks. Thought I tried '> file' already, but maybe it failed because I didn't use a space.

Haha, and rightly so! It's even in the help file shown... I failed, my bad.

dserrano5

legendary

Activity: 1974

Merit: 1029

Quote from: SgtSpike on July 07, 2011, 11:12:10 AM

Can results be logged to a text file?

Add '> file' to the command line. The greater-than character means "redirect output to file".

Quote from: SgtSpike on July 07, 2011, 11:38:39 AM

It can. The -r switch was the trick.

I assumed you were using it

.

kseistrup

hero member

Activity: 566

Merit: 500

Unselfish actions pay back better

The source code in the original article doesn't seem to be complete, where can I download the full .c file? Please put it on github or a dropbox or something.

Cheers,

SgtSpike

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1005

Quote from: drrussellshane on July 07, 2011, 11:32:00 AM

Quote from: samr7 on July 07, 2011, 08:04:38 AM

Quote from: SgtSpike on July 07, 2011, 03:26:33 AM

Regardless, still getting the invalid character '[' error without pipes in the text file. Any other suggestions?

What's the exact error message? Is it, "Invalid character '[' in prefix?"

The only suggestion (which might get me in trouble) is to run with "-r".

So can the brackets [] not be used for finding an address with a specific prefix?

It can. The -r switch was the trick.

drrussellshane

hero member

Activity: 546

Merit: 500

Quote from: samr7 on July 07, 2011, 08:04:38 AM

Quote from: SgtSpike on July 07, 2011, 03:26:33 AM

Regardless, still getting the invalid character '[' error without pipes in the text file. Any other suggestions?

What's the exact error message? Is it, "Invalid character '[' in prefix?"

The only suggestion (which might get me in trouble) is to run with "-r".

So can the brackets [] not be used for finding an address with a specific prefix?

SgtSpike

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1005

Ok, last request I promise. Cheesy

Can results be logged to a text file?

samr7

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 430

Firstbits: 1samr7

Quote from: SgtSpike on July 07, 2011, 03:26:33 AM

Regardless, still getting the invalid character '[' error without pipes in the text file. Any other suggestions?

What's the exact error message? Is it, "Invalid character '[' in prefix?"

The only suggestion (which might get me in trouble) is to run with "-r".

samr7

full member

Activity: 140

Merit: 430

Firstbits: 1samr7

I just pasted version 0.5.

Now with worker threads and CPU count detection, suggested by davux and others
Exact prefixes can now be matched case-insensitively with "-i", for SgtSpike
Fixed an integer overflow problem with the status display

By default, it will use all available CPU cores. If you want the old single-threaded behavior, run with "-t 1".

dserrano5

legendary

Activity: 1974

Merit: 1029

Quote from: SgtSpike on July 07, 2011, 03:26:33 AM

I have the targets stored in a text file. [...] It seemed that the command window changed the double quotes to an o with two dots over it

Hmm, that's probably due to some encoding issue. Why don't you try generating things step by step? First a plain "1", which should always succeed, then "1a", then "1a" inside a file (no quotes needed), then "1[Aa]" in the command line (unquoted, single and double), then the same in a file... until it bombs.

Yeti

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Firstbits: 1yetiax

Quote from: SgtSpike on July 07, 2011, 03:26:33 AM

I have the targets stored in a text file. I tried encapsulating each regex in single and double quotes, both errored out. It seemed that the command window changed the double quotes to an o with two dots over it, and the single quotes to one of those AE letter combos. Not sure what's up with that.

Regardless, still getting the invalid character '[' error without pipes in the text file. Any other suggestions?

You mean like ö and æ? Wink

Seems the character encoding is off, though it could only be a display error if you use an SSH session.
Usually " and ' shouldn't give "funny" characters, because they are even contained in 7-bit ASCII. Thus no collision when using different 8-bit encodings. Problems usually arise when the shell uses "fancy" quotation marks like ‘, ’, “ or ”, which are not contained in all character sets / have a different byte interpretation in other charsets.

Pieter Wuille

legendary

Activity: 1072

Merit: 1181

If you tell me your address, i only need 2^160 attempts (=EC multiplication + hashing) to find a private key whose address collides. That's all i need to steal your funds.

Hence, unless you use send-to-pubkey (which the default client only uses for generations), bitcoin keys have a security level of no more than 160 bits.

Shevek

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: Pieter Wuille on July 07, 2011, 04:28:57 AM

That's not entirely true: as addresses are only 160 bits, it suffices to try 2^160 private keys to have a reasonable chance of finding one that matches a given address. Thus, a private key only needs 160 of randomness.

Th 160-bit reduction of addresses of public keys is a way to keep shorter chains with still good collision resistance. But inside this, there is a true 256-bit public key

Thus, the task-force needed to blow up a private key (that is: the number of tries in EC-product in order to find one private key that matches the targeted public key) is ~2^256 because the EC-multiplier is just a 256 bit number (a 78-decimal-digit integer, if you want).

If you resign 96 bits of good entroy, you are giving a chance to an attacker to resolve your priv. key after 2^160 tries. It is still huge but... why resign the full strength of the elliptic curve?

Pieter Wuille

legendary

Activity: 1072

Merit: 1181

That's not entirely true: as addresses are only 160 bits, it suffices to try 2^160 private keys to have a reasonable chance of finding one that matches a given address. Thus, a private key only needs 160 of randomness.

Furthermore, if you limit eg. four base58 characters of the address to particular string (as this patch allows you to), you already lock log(58^4)/log(2)=23.4 bits of those 160 bits through other means.

I say you need 136.6 bits of entropy per vanity key found (assuming the above restriction), not per attempt, as the attacker cannot observe your failed attempts.

Shevek

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

Quote from: pB11 on July 06, 2011, 07:23:52 AM

Btw using just time() was quite secure anyway. Assuming Vanitygen runs at least several minutes, the amount of keys to brute-force is >2^64:
- 15 bit PID

To be used once (for one key). If used twice or more times, the full chain of keys can be compromised.

Quote from: pB11 on July 06, 2011, 07:23:52 AM

- 21 bit timeframe (1 month)

Again, to be used once. Consecutive keys will have a time variation about perhaps 8~10 bits.

Quote from: pB11 on July 06, 2011, 07:23:52 AM

- 7-8 bit CPU speed, + a few bits of time uncertainty each EC_KEY_generate_key()

To be used for one key. The entropy between keys drastically falls.

Quote from: pB11 on July 06, 2011, 07:23:52 AM

- 2^20+ keys to generate

I don't understand your claim: each key needs 256 bits to be builded. And these 256 bits should have high entropy quality (ideally, 256 bits of entropy). So, picking up 256 bits really random is a hard task.

Guys: velocity and good entropy cannot be pushed together. Use these vanity addresses only if you like strong emotions.

Topic: Vanitygen: Vanity bitcoin address generator/miner [v0.22] - page 188. (Read 1153620 times)