Pages:
Author

Topic: Veriblock is spamming the BTC network. Is this bad, or positive for LN adoption? - page 2. (Read 331 times)

full member
Activity: 924
Merit: 148
Quote
Is this bad, or positive for LN adoption?
One of the most retarded questions I've ever seen on this forum.
LN is one of the possible solutions for all those problems with slow and expensive transactions. And you ask if the existence of this problem good for development of its solution. lol
hero member
Activity: 3178
Merit: 977
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
This explains why Bitcoin Cash has been rising so rapidly in recent times right alongside Bitcoin. I don't think this is helpful in the long run since it affects Bitcoin speed, TX fees at the cost of improving LN adoption which is not worth it.

As the article mentioned, Counterparty followed a similar approach and was destroyed thanks to a protocol update. There are better ways to improve LN adoption.
jr. member
Activity: 242
Merit: 7
I've been seeing many complaint about network spam by Veriblock IEO. Fees are now higher but apparently LN capacity is also mooning.

https://chainbulletin.com/veriblock-is-using-27-of-bitcoins-block-space/

What is your opinion on the matter? Should devs kick Veriblock, or allow them to spam the network to get more LN nodes?
Pages:
Jump to: