Pages:
Author

Topic: Verified twitter, telegram account is the strong point for a new project? - page 2. (Read 623 times)

full member
Activity: 709
Merit: 100
#SWGT PRE-SALE IS LIVE
Why should you considered a project legit, based only seeing verified Twitter account? I know if a Project's Social media get verified, then they'll seems more realistic and trustworthy than others but nowadays that's Over! Cause scammers are applying various way to make you convince they are real and thus they'll fruad with you. So never invest with a project by seeing verified mark! Rather check project quality, community, developers as well as Others things that is important to check a legit project
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 515
My friend informed me that at this time many upcoming project social account like twitter, telegram is verified.
Does that mean these projects can be trusted?
In fact many are encouraged to invest in any new project following this.
What is your opinion on this matter?

Before Twitter changed their structural verification system, it was and it count when Twitter used to identify users base on their impression, legitimate activity and how active they are on the platform but all that changes when Elon took over the platform and changed it payment method, now all the verification don't need an indepth review before they verify account, even scammers have find a way to impersonate real accounts on Twitter and they are active on the platform doing wrong things to people, either verified twitter or not, just know that even legit project do rugg investors.

Telegram verified accounts, groups and channel are not so different from Twitter, it is the same process of been verified. All you need to do is to make payment and after review, it get verified, becareful of telegram groups but verified accounts is not a primary factor to used to verify legitimacy of project, you should DIOR more about the team and what they want to do about the project, that is the only way you can avoid been a scape goat to scammers.
jr. member
Activity: 103
Merit: 3
Pepemo.vip
My friend informed me that at this time many upcoming project social account like twitter, telegram is verified.
Does that mean these projects can be trusted?
In fact many are encouraged to invest in any new project following this.
What is your opinion on this matter?


Verification is too easy now because there are now can get by paying. Having verified twitter and telegram doesn't means that the project will be legit and long run. Because I have seen there are couple of sellers who selling telegram verification for only 2$-5$ monthly forums. So always check the investors, team members and the use case of the project. Then you can filter what are the good ones or what are the bad ones.
legendary
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1024
Hello Leo! You can still win.
My friend informed me that at this time many upcoming project social account like twitter, telegram is verified.
Does that mean these projects can be trusted?
In fact many are encouraged to invest in any new project following this.
What is your opinion on this matter?

There is an iota of truth in what you said but that should not be the only criteria to know a good project. This is because with Elon Musk twitter, small bucks can buy you blue tick and also it is not difficult to buy fake followers to push the project.

What you should look up to is the dedication of the team behind the project, the project road map and the vision of the project. But some persons doesn't have the ability to make this research, they rather stick with king bitcoin and some top altcoins.
hero member
Activity: 2702
Merit: 704
Even if that badge still forced users to go through that verification process it would still not mean anything, I have seen several projects on the past that claimed to gain verification by an exchange and they still scammed their customers in the end, so this demonstrates once again that trying to rely on a centralized institution to do the job we should do ourselves is a bad idea.

So if someone out there wants to know if the project in which they are interested is any good then they need to do their due diligence, and if they refuse to do it then they need give up the idea of investing in that project.
thats true, heck even someone that already considered famous enough for most investors like certain founder of coin that once overtaken ethereum position are still scamming.
these reliability based on trust against certain figure is already getting old enough, its all about the system that prevents such thing from happening that matters more.
If this was not so tragic and it did not included thousands of people losing their money this could be even funny, as bitcoin was created as a trustless currency and as such all of those attempts by scammers to build trust among investors should be useless from the get go.

Investors should only look at the merits and the implementation of the projects in which they are interested, and if the implementation is not good or nonexistent then they need to stay away from such coins as the possibilities of being scammed are very high.
hero member
Activity: 2772
Merit: 524
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I'm not very familiar with this issue as I rarely participate in airdrops or social media campaigns, but I've heard that on Twitter posts are limited and if you want to post more you have to spend a little money. this might be a kind of tax because social media owners see crypto is a big thing  Grin
thats not the case, the twitter just doing it to limit people from taking advantage the API I guess or even scrapping twitter content thats why elon decided to do that but regardless its
really unwise decision since this means they are forcing people to pay them for something that supposed to be free.
these airdrop hunters in general that frequently tweets about their favoured project and sometime take a look for various emerging airdrops are gonna be needing to pay some hefty amount to twitter.
its just massive disappointment honestly.
hero member
Activity: 2296
Merit: 504
back then when the tick badge basically that means account verified was gotten through real verification it still holds value and adds reliability towards some project but the fact that the rules have been changed to commercialize this kind of badge then all of these instantly became meaningless, so depending on verified twitter to determine whether a project is reliable is kind of foolish honestly.
Even if that badge still forced users to go through that verification process it would still not mean anything, I have seen several projects on the past that claimed to gain verification by an exchange and they still scammed their customers in the end, so this demonstrates once again that trying to rely on a centralized institution to do the job we should do ourselves is a bad idea.

So if someone out there wants to know if the project in which they are interested is any good then they need to do their due diligence, and if they refuse to do it then they need give up the idea of investing in that project.
thats true, heck even someone that already considered famous enough for most investors like certain founder of coin that once overtaken ethereum position are still scamming.
these reliability based on trust against certain figure is already getting old enough, its all about the system that prevents such thing from happening that matters more.
member
Activity: 879
Merit: 10
Binance #Smart World Global Token
In my own humble opinion I do not believe because a project social media accounts are verified, that the projects are genuine and authentic. In this era where you can bought blue stroke to verify their accounts. If it were to be before that account verification was based on how long you have been on the platform and the influence you are making or based of the kind of position you are currently occupying in the society. I believe having a background check on the team of any project is the main thing to consider. How long the team has been together, the developer. This will sure let you know if it’s a project to be part of or project to admire from a distance.
hero member
Activity: 2632
Merit: 649
Seabet.io | Crypto-Casino
this is a good indicator, but in my opinion it is better when the team is public and the developers have a history and you can check their biography. This inspires more confidence, and the second point for me that I draw attention to is partners, namely how serious funds or projects are and whether there are posts on social networks or on the site. And the third point is an independent audit from a public report, which, in my opinion, is the best formula that will show how serious the project is.
full member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 100
I'm not very familiar with this issue as I rarely participate in airdrops or social media campaigns, but I've heard that on Twitter posts are limited and if you want to post more you have to spend a little money. this might be a kind of tax because social media owners see crypto is a big thing  Grin
member
Activity: 205
Merit: 10
Verified social media accounts are extremely important in terms of credibility and reputation.
Nope, Verified social media accounts will never surveyor of good or bad project, without verified accounts so many projects was huge success in the previous year, now it's trap to attract investors in new project, scammers taken this opportunity, after blue is badge is one kind of business for elon musk.
member
Activity: 322
Merit: 10
back then when the tick badge basically that means account verified was gotten through real verification it still holds value and adds reliability towards some project but the fact that the rules have been changed to commercialize this kind of badge then all of these instantly became meaningless, so depending on verified twitter to determine whether a project is reliable is kind of foolish honestly.
Even when the blue tick badge was verified rather than buy, It's still the same thing, majority of them are prompting the coins for their gains, Infant during the verified era many people get verified so that many companies will approach them  for advert,
hero member
Activity: 2702
Merit: 704
back then when the tick badge basically that means account verified was gotten through real verification it still holds value and adds reliability towards some project but the fact that the rules have been changed to commercialize this kind of badge then all of these instantly became meaningless, so depending on verified twitter to determine whether a project is reliable is kind of foolish honestly.
Even if that badge still forced users to go through that verification process it would still not mean anything, I have seen several projects on the past that claimed to gain verification by an exchange and they still scammed their customers in the end, so this demonstrates once again that trying to rely on a centralized institution to do the job we should do ourselves is a bad idea.

So if someone out there wants to know if the project in which they are interested is any good then they need to do their due diligence, and if they refuse to do it then they need give up the idea of investing in that project.
hero member
Activity: 2772
Merit: 524
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
the blue tick is not a benchmark for whether a project is good or not because the blue tick on twitter is easy to get by buying it, especially since twitter was bought by elon, everything has to be bought, as if twitter were an elon's money field
thats fair point enough, so many things has been commercialized by elon musk basically they increase their company profit at the expenses of users of twitter paying more and more for everything that they usually get free and honestly it should be free not paying everything like this.
hopefully the emergence of thread by meta even though we know how bad company it is could somewhat gives benchmark towards twitter and hopefully twitter will get some common sense around their executives that what they are doing is definitely gonna make their company bankrupt in the long term.
hero member
Activity: 2296
Merit: 506
Cryptocasino.com
back then when the tick badge basically that means account verified was gotten through real verification it still holds value and adds reliability towards some project but the fact that the rules have been changed to commercialize this kind of badge then all of these instantly became meaningless, so depending on verified twitter to determine whether a project is reliable is kind of foolish honestly.
full member
Activity: 1064
Merit: 100
Combo Network
My friend informed me that at this time many upcoming project social account like twitter, telegram is verified.
Does that mean these projects can be trusted?
In fact many are encouraged to invest in any new project following this.
What is your opinion on this matter?
I don't know when was the last time did that ever happen. Of course that is not the full proof to say that the project will be legit, strong and has potential for success. Perhaps it can be trusted but having it an easy way is surely doubtful considering you can literally verify them in minutes if you have money. It is not and shouldn't be the basis for a strong project.
It's true that the current policy where we can buy verification or checkmarks for Twitter accounts is really easy,
so don't take that as the basis that it's a strong project,
and even with the ease of getting the checkmark it is not impossible it is used for negative things like for scam projects.
full member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 105
Chainjoes.com
the blue tick is not a benchmark for whether a project is good or not because the blue tick on twitter is easy to get by buying it, especially since twitter was bought by elon, everything has to be bought, as if twitter were an elon's money field
This is becoming more and more common, and it is still a way that many people take advantage of people's ignorance using different social networking platforms as a criterion to talk about the quality of a project. good judgment. I remember a few weeks ago, most of the memecoin projects used this as a tool to attract interaction as well as they used to take advantage of what other influencers mentioned. Perhaps this is also a trick to attract users, but for an experienced person, we all understand to evaluate a good project or not based on many different factors, the fact that some sites web or tools to support this I can also find them, but changing the market requires adaptation and rethinking of how it works as well as personal research rather than depending on one factor.
sr. member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 257
Chainjoes.com
the blue tick is not a benchmark for whether a project is good or not because the blue tick on twitter is easy to get by buying it, especially since twitter was bought by elon, everything has to be bought, as if twitter were an elon's money field
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1131
Verified social media accounts are extremely important in terms of credibility and reputation. When I see a verified social media account, I usually think that it has met certain criteria. However, in recent days, social media platforms have weakened the criteria for having a verified account to earn more money. That's why verified social media accounts don't mean much to me anymore. I'm going to exaggerate a bit but for me there is not much difference between any social media account and a verified social media account.
full member
Activity: 928
Merit: 101
A strong project they will have to pay attention to verified social media on their own, but on the contrary, I don't give much credit to a verified social media to evaluate a quality project. quantity. As far as I know since Elon Musk took over twitter identity verification is simply providing monthly fees to get a green tick, however most of us can do it that, and even low-quality or ill-intentioned projects are possible. But the interaction on social networks does not measure much in terms of quality because they are easily bought, I look at any project, the first criteria is about the team, partners, product features , roadmaps, tokens,... so that you can have a better overview of the project, not just depending on each social network.
Pages:
Jump to: