Had the power go out this afternoon, been running the client for the last week 24/7, no problems there. Now I was lucky today, because had just shut the client down a few hours before the power flicked out, so not asking because of an emergency, just want to be prepared...
What should one do if the client is running (WinXP) when the power fails?
Not asking about basic computer problems/solutions here, such as lost/bad clusters that might result, strictly asking about recommendations pertaining to the client software and the integrity of it's file system. Assume no transaction was in progress when the power failed, it was simply open and active at the time.
1) Should some files in the app data folder be deleted before restarting?
2) Lets say upon restart, the balance remains correct and no errors show up while re-sync, are we good to go? Should some form of validation be preformed?
3) Are there various errors that might appear, and/or recommendations on how they should be repaired, if encountered?
Thanks much, 6.2 has been working great for me...
GR
Topic: Version 0.6.2 available (Read 8331 times)
This is not a bug, it's a feature. It's not shown since, conceptually, it "never really left your wallet." (Which glosses over all the technical details which you are 100% familiar with, but our target audience will not be.)
Then it's a bug that all others transactions to myself show up? I've been using coincontrol to move around a few of my coins from one address to another (yeah, I shouldn't care about that, but sometimes I'm just like that) and each of those gets listed. Without the sending/receiving address and the amount though, see my bug report a few posts earlier here (well, the amount shows up, but only if you double click a transaction). I understand that automatic coin-change transactions don't need to be displayed, but when I manually create the transaction, I expect it to be listed.As for coin-change in general: it would be nice if the change would go to the address from which coins are send. Or if there was an option to display all transactions, even automatic change transfers.
Quote from: Rich Kulawiec
Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
To get full developer attention you need to open a ticket for such things on Github
.Dia
This is not a bug, it's a feature. It's not shown since, conceptually, it "never really left your wallet." (Which glosses over all the technical details which you are 100% familiar with, but our target audience will not be.)
Then it's a bug that all others transactions to myself show up? I've been using coincontrol to move around a few of my coins from one address to another (yeah, I shouldn't care about that, but sometimes I'm just like that) and each of those gets listed. Without the sending/receiving address and the amount though, see my bug report a few posts earlier here (well, the amount shows up, but only if you double click a transaction). I understand that automatic coin-change transactions don't need to be displayed, but when I manually create the transaction, I expect it to be listed.As for coin-change in general: it would be nice if the change would go to the address from which coins are send. Or if there was an option to display all transactions, even automatic change transfers.
Quote from: Rich Kulawiec
Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
Ran into another bug:
I sent some coins (using coincontrol) from one of my addresses (A) to another person (B) and decided to send the leftover amount (essentially the change) to one of my addresses (C).
The transaction to the other user just shows up fine in the transactions tab, however the one to myself is missing in the list.
Since the involved balances are all correct (A to B is ok, change went to C, A is empty), I assume it's just not displayed in the transaction list.
I sent some coins (using coincontrol) from one of my addresses (A) to another person (B) and decided to send the leftover amount (essentially the change) to one of my addresses (C).
The transaction to the other user just shows up fine in the transactions tab, however the one to myself is missing in the list.
Since the involved balances are all correct (A to B is ok, change went to C, A is empty), I assume it's just not displayed in the transaction list.
This is not a bug, it's a feature. It's not shown since, conceptually, it "never really left your wallet." (Which glosses over all the technical details which you are 100% familiar with, but our target audience will not be.)
Ran into another bug:
I sent some coins (using coincontrol) from one of my addresses (A) to another person (B) and decided to send the leftover amount (essentially the change) to one of my addresses (C).
The transaction to the other user just shows up fine in the transactions tab, however the one to myself is missing in the list.
Since the involved balances are all correct (A to B is ok, change went to C, A is empty), I assume it's just not displayed in the transaction list.
I sent some coins (using coincontrol) from one of my addresses (A) to another person (B) and decided to send the leftover amount (essentially the change) to one of my addresses (C).
The transaction to the other user just shows up fine in the transactions tab, however the one to myself is missing in the list.
Since the involved balances are all correct (A to B is ok, change went to C, A is empty), I assume it's just not displayed in the transaction list.
From the client's perspective, there isn't any way to tell except with the block timestamps which I doubt it will trust.
I thought I read the other day that the blocks are timestamped with the current epoch time according to whoever solved it, using unsigned integer?From the client's perspective, there isn't any way to tell except with the block timestamps which I doubt it will trust.
I thought I read the other day that the blocks are timestamped with the current epoch time according to whoever solved it, using unsigned integer? In the freebsd port tree (/usr/ports/net-p2p/bitcoin) there is still the v0.4.0 version.
Does any of you guys have the skills or know who we can ask to bring this port up to 0.6.2?
Does any of you guys have the skills or know who we can ask to bring this port up to 0.6.2?
Looks like the committer is shaun at freebsd dot org. Strangely he updated the Makefile two days ago.
In the freebsd port tree (/usr/ports/net-p2p/bitcoin) there is still the v0.4.0 version.
Does any of you guys have the skills or know who we can ask to bring this port up to 0.6.2?
Does any of you guys have the skills or know who we can ask to bring this port up to 0.6.2?
When sending coins from one of your addresses to another one of your addresses, the client only displays an entry saying "transaction to yourself" without listing the amount or the from/to address.
While this isn't a bug, it makes keeping track of your coins difficult. Blockchain.info for example lists the transaction just like every other one; I suggest that the client should do the same.
While this isn't a bug, it makes keeping track of your coins difficult. Blockchain.info for example lists the transaction just like every other one; I suggest that the client should do the same.
You should perhaps create an issue ticket directly on Github.
Dia
From the client's perspective, there isn't any way to tell except with the block timestamps which I doubt it will trust.
I think it would be more useful, for people like me who don't keep the client running all the time, to display the date and time for when transactions are added to the blockchain and not when my client happens to catch up and notices those transactions.
For instance I might do several transactions over the week but when I start my client up at the end of the week - today for example - it makes it appear all those transactions happened just today.
I know I could investigate using blockchain.info to find this information but it would more convenient if the client could display proper transaction times.
For people who do keep the client running all the time they wouldn't even notice a change if this was implemented.
For instance I might do several transactions over the week but when I start my client up at the end of the week - today for example - it makes it appear all those transactions happened just today.
I know I could investigate using blockchain.info to find this information but it would more convenient if the client could display proper transaction times.
For people who do keep the client running all the time they wouldn't even notice a change if this was implemented.
When sending coins from one of your addresses to another one of your addresses, the client only displays an entry saying "transaction to yourself" without listing the amount or the from/to address.
While this isn't a bug, it makes keeping track of your coins difficult. Blockchain.info for example lists the transaction just like every other one; I suggest that the client should do the same.
While this isn't a bug, it makes keeping track of your coins difficult. Blockchain.info for example lists the transaction just like every other one; I suggest that the client should do the same.
You should perhaps create an issue ticket directly on Github.
Dia
I see that too on W7 x64, and additionally another display anomaly: Clicking the icon once pops the window into the foreground, and clicking again puts it back down in the tray. This isn't a bad thing, but it is different from how it used to work. It used to require a double click to open, and X it out to minimize to tray.
That's a new feature and intended! Should have been mentioned in the changelog, perhaps it was in and you didn't see it
?Dia
I'm running into a minor annoyance that is happening on two separate Windows 7 x64 machines. After exiting bitcoin-qt, the icon remains in the system tray until you move the mouse over it. I'm not sure if it is a Windows issue or something specific to my display settings, but I don't recall it happening with earlier versions. Anyone else seeing the same behavior?
This will be fixed with the next version, I created a patch for this. Was related to how Bitcoin-Qt was exit until 0.6.2.
Dia
bitcoin-qt has a flaw when you have thousands of transactions It starts to be a CPU and memory hog. Plus it looks like it was done in VB6. The GUI is crap, please go back to one of the beta designs as it was far superior.
I'm running this on windows, setting the priory to low, and setting the affinity to only using 2 CPU's on bitcoin-qt.exe. No real change, still a hog.
The client started to become a more of a resource whore around the ~1000 transactions mark... not sure 100% tho. I'm a little over 11k transactions.. and doing more and more everyday.
I've tried multibit, and Electrum.. both sux imho... May give multibit another try, but hate running java.. *sigh*
I know of a few other users with the same issue... From my conclusion it seems that the bitcoin client does not like to have thousands and thousands of transactions
Any suggestions?
I'm running this on windows, setting the priory to low, and setting the affinity to only using 2 CPU's on bitcoin-qt.exe. No real change, still a hog.
The client started to become a more of a resource whore around the ~1000 transactions mark... not sure 100% tho. I'm a little over 11k transactions.. and doing more and more everyday.
I've tried multibit, and Electrum.. both sux imho... May give multibit another try, but hate running java.. *sigh*
I know of a few other users with the same issue... From my conclusion it seems that the bitcoin client does not like to have thousands and thousands of transactions
Any suggestions?
Just curious, care to explain why you didn't like Electrum and MultiBit? Have you tried both recently?
lol VB6. It's called Qt and it's from Nokia: http://qt.nokia.com/
If you really have 11,000 transactions, why are you even using the GUI?
And if you know how to program in wx, you are welcome to maintain the old version. Luke-Jr will even help you set it up.
If you really have 11,000 transactions, why are you even using the GUI?
And if you know how to program in wx, you are welcome to maintain the old version. Luke-Jr will even help you set it up.
Happy I got some lol's out of the VB6 comment.
So, run bitcoind instead of GUI you're saying?
Thanks!
lol VB6. It's called Qt and it's from Nokia: http://qt.nokia.com/
If you really have 11,000 transactions, why are you even using the GUI?
And if you know how to program in wx, you are welcome to maintain the old version. Luke-Jr will even help you set it up.
If you really have 11,000 transactions, why are you even using the GUI?
And if you know how to program in wx, you are welcome to maintain the old version. Luke-Jr will even help you set it up.
Happy I got some lol's out of the VB6 comment.
So, run bitcoind instead of GUI you're saying?
Thanks!
It's actually not from Nokia... Nokia bought out it's creator (Trolltech) in 2008 and hasn't changed much since.
Looks far better than most Java stuff, you must admit.
Jump to: