Topic: Virtacoin Goes Live july 1 2014 - page 17. (Read 116723 times)
Hello friends am sure this news might help virtacoin in the future/
https://news.bitcoin.com/us-banking-regulator-positive-cryptocurrency-regulation/?utm_source=OneSignalPush&utm_medium=notification&utm_campaign=PushNotifications
Hello has the crypto banking started in India now has virtas post news sometime ago ?
How i wish this news will be good for crypto bank
https://cointelegraph.com/news/paxos-seeks-approval-to-become-fully-regulated-crypto-bank
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
hello kutta harami rajendra singh ratnu alias virtas,
when i called you addressing good words you do not understand and started to you use slang words.next call when i used slang words you quickly understand it.you are behenchod pagalchod motherchod kutta harami and nothing else.you need sticks of police jo tera mar mar ke gand fata denge.sala juta admi kutta kuttahi hota hai.
when i called you addressing good words you do not understand and started to you use slang words.next call when i used slang words you quickly understand it.you are behenchod pagalchod motherchod kutta harami and nothing else.you need sticks of police jo tera mar mar ke gand fata denge.sala juta admi kutta kuttahi hota hai.
Hello Virtas and friends,
The ''vivaadz'' site (http://www.vivaadz.win/) will open in about 18 days,
After opening the ''vivaadz'' site, What does this site do?
The ''vivaadz'' site (http://www.vivaadz.win/) will open in about 18 days,
After opening the ''vivaadz'' site, What does this site do?
Hello Virtas all what you post i want to know if this has something to do with Virtacoin if i may ask ?
Note to Readers: On December 1, 2020, the Libra Association was renamed to Diem Association. This white paper, originally published by the Libra Association in June 2019 and then re-issued as a stand-alone update in April 2020, replaces previous versions published by the Association. Supporting technical papers published by the Libra Association in June 2019, have either been edited or retired. Features of the project as implemented may differ based on regulatory approvals or other considerations, and may evolve over time.
https://www.diem.com/en-us/white-paper/#cover-letter
Facebook, which changed the name of its payments unit Calibra to “Novi Financial” in May, remains one of 27 members of the Diem Association, formerly the Libra Association. Novi head David Marcus is one of Diem’s five board members.
Some think Big changes coming for Banking Era Crypto World
Litecoin LTC All Address : 2546788 LTC already Hit all Market Palace and Strong Support in world
VirtaCoin VTA All Address : 1759473 VTA Yet Not Public Launch and not any Support Not yet Officially Publish
This is Strong Level of VTA if VTA Hit Like LTC market and launch than You Surprising Address and Holding amount Peoples Pockets ... Same as Bitcoin.
LTC world wide now and every one Known this Crypto currency .... But VTA yet not Publish and not known world ...
VirtaCoin VTA Safe only on Computer Wallet !
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
https://www.diem.com/en-us/white-paper/#cover-letter
Facebook, which changed the name of its payments unit Calibra to “Novi Financial” in May, remains one of 27 members of the Diem Association, formerly the Libra Association. Novi head David Marcus is one of Diem’s five board members.
Some think Big changes coming for Banking Era Crypto World
Litecoin LTC All Address : 2546788 LTC already Hit all Market Palace and Strong Support in world
VirtaCoin VTA All Address : 1759473 VTA Yet Not Public Launch and not any Support Not yet Officially Publish
This is Strong Level of VTA if VTA Hit Like LTC market and launch than You Surprising Address and Holding amount Peoples Pockets ... Same as Bitcoin.
LTC world wide now and every one Known this Crypto currency .... But VTA yet not Publish and not known world ...
VirtaCoin VTA Safe only on Computer Wallet !
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
The new funding round values the company at about $1.1 billion, Chief Executive Officer Sami Inkinen said. With the latest investment, six-year-old Virta has raised $231 million in equity.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-02/diabetes-startup-virta-health-valued-at-1-billion-in-fundraise?sref=d76K8I5l
[/quote
Hello Virtas please can we know if this news have something to do with virtacoin as crypto?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-02/diabetes-startup-virta-health-valued-at-1-billion-in-fundraise?sref=d76K8I5l
[/quote
Hello Virtas please can we know if this news have something to do with virtacoin as crypto?
The new funding round values the company at about $1.1 billion, Chief Executive Officer Sami Inkinen said. With the latest investment, six-year-old Virta has raised $231 million in equity.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-02/diabetes-startup-virta-health-valued-at-1-billion-in-fundraise?sref=d76K8I5l
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-02/diabetes-startup-virta-health-valued-at-1-billion-in-fundraise?sref=d76K8I5l
Hi Virtas,
Is Virta Health related to Virtacoin?
The new funding round values the company at about $1.1 billion, Chief Executive Officer Sami Inkinen said. With the latest investment, six-year-old Virta has raised $231 million in equity.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-02/diabetes-startup-virta-health-valued-at-1-billion-in-fundraise?sref=d76K8I5l
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-02/diabetes-startup-virta-health-valued-at-1-billion-in-fundraise?sref=d76K8I5l
sala kutta harami rajendra singh ratnu alias virtas,
sala bahenchod maotherchod kutta harami ratnu vta kab launch ho raha hai.tik se bol pagalchod nehi to tera gand fata denge.ekto vta launch nehi karta and dusre project ko bhi jo alag admin hai unko jhut bolke delay kar raha hai.sala isbar tere project nehi launch nehi hua to tere gand fata denge.yad rakna e baat ko.
sala bahenchod maotherchod kutta harami ratnu vta kab launch ho raha hai.tik se bol pagalchod nehi to tera gand fata denge.ekto vta launch nehi karta and dusre project ko bhi jo alag admin hai unko jhut bolke delay kar raha hai.sala isbar tere project nehi launch nehi hua to tere gand fata denge.yad rakna e baat ko.
Hi Virtas,
On the first page of the ''http://www.virtacoin.net'' site in the Virtacoin column,
Wrong typed ''Bitcoin Paper'' instead of ''Virtacoin Paper'',
Please correct it.
On the first page of the ''http://www.virtacoin.net'' site in the Virtacoin column,
Wrong typed ''Bitcoin Paper'' instead of ''Virtacoin Paper'',
Please correct it.
Hello friends,
Can anyone explain about site of ''www.like2pay.world'' ?
What does this site want to do?
Can anyone explain about site of ''www.like2pay.world'' ?
What does this site want to do?
Hello all any news on virtacoin this week.
DEAR FRIENDS,
virtacoin should launch in starting of December.we want 1 vta=1000 usd.thanks.
Are you kidding? What $1000? No one buys 1 sat. virtacoin should launch in starting of December.we want 1 vta=1000 usd.thanks.
Hello can some one help me to login at https://erex.io/en/ or reset my password? i have contact them no show hope some one who can help me to do that thanks.
hello soon facebook launch https://news.bitcoin.com/facebook-libra-cryptocurrency-launch/?utm_source=OneSignalPush&
we hope virtacoin to launch.
we hope virtacoin to launch.
DEAR FRIENDS,
virtacoin should launch in starting of December.we want 1 vta=1000 usd.thanks.
virtacoin should launch in starting of December.we want 1 vta=1000 usd.thanks.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/big-banks-think-new-furniture-is-innovation-but-they-are-wrong0
When banks finally come to improve their technology experience, they go no deeper than changing the front end. They’ll make a button blue instead of green or create rounded edges on buttons instead of square ones. They think in terms of their interfaces, not the back end. If a bank were to truly innovate its technology, it’d dig deeper into the back end and transform its legacy technical infrastructure, which has been the same for decades. Few today even know how to work on those old programming languages of yesteryear, such as COBOL, so they’re stuck with upgrades that turn the software into a Frankenstein-esque abomination.
The big banks don’t do innovation in house. Big tech conglomerates don’t even innovate. They acquire new ideas, innovations and teams that have done the innovation already. When they want a new, undeveloped technology as part of their internal technology portfolio, they sometimes speak to journalists about it so that they start covering it, which gains interest from the market. And then startups begin working on the problem. They see the opportunity and start raising funds in an attempt to execute, and big tech companies just observe. And then, one or two years later, they acquire the best company in the space and make it a part of their conglomerates.
The traditional model for Big Tech development strategy is to acquire already successful startups, as they can do this without any risk. They pay a bit more, but they don’t have a risk of failure. The startup and its investors take on all the risk. Facebook, for example, bought Instagram in 2012 and WhatsApp in 2014 for exactly this reason. And these purchases led to serious concerns about Facebook’s “data monopoly.”
Financial companies take this approach, as well. All the big players have acceleration programs for this reason. They find startups, which have ideas they might want to incorporate in the future, and they provide them with certain resources. Big financial institutions then buy the ideas once they are developed so as to implement them.
Related: Banks must establish infrastructure for digital assets before it’s too late
If a big bank tried to implement a new technology in-house, it might not work. The corporate structure is so rigid, it can’t adapt to new innovations woven into the framework of the bank’s already existing technology and protocols. Without the agility and flexibility, it can’t take the risk of developing and incorporating new technologies. The corporate structure does not innovate well. It commercially adopts — that is, co-opts — much of the innovation it needs through mergers and acquisitions.
Fintech innovations
Banks should focus on implementing the innovations of the fintech world — particularly, those that ensure customer privacy and provide secure purchases. When the bank tries to acquire products, it should acquire the team and the corporate infrastructure, as well. That’s how the bank could begin smoothly changing its core processes. Examples of this already exist. In one model, the bank arranges secure purchases while working with personal data and transactions, while a fintech acquires customers and provides customer service.
Related: Crypto banks are going to swallow fiat banks in 3 years — or even less
The revised Payment Services Directive 2 initiative, commonly referred to as PSD2, is a European regulation for electronic payment services, aiming to make payments more secure and boost innovation in Europe. PSD2 divides all the financial businesses into two parts: the first one is infrastructure and security, and the second one is the front end and innovative customer care. This is a better approach for now, but in the future, improvements will be demanded.
Small payment services such as Revolut, Monzo, N26 and others are growing very fast. These startups are based on traditional financial structure — leaning on the banking licenses and payment service provider licenses of their partners — while incorporating innovations from the fintech world. These digital banks develop their competitive advantage and acquire customers in short order. This model works. Banks sit on a banking license and money and provide security while outsourcing a share of customer acquisition and customer care to leading fintech startups. This same model could bridge the gap between banks and crypto startups, as well.
Users’ privacy
When it comes to modern innovations, what should banks focus on incorporating? The answer is that on the current technological backbone deployed by banks, there isn’t a lot of user privacy. When we use a bank’s services, a staff member there still works with our transaction history, obtaining more information than is on our social media profiles. Who likes it when someone has access to such sensitive data? Probably nobody. Regardless, banks currently sell this data and information. In certain jurisdictions, they can sell information about personal transactions.
When you have the transaction history of a user, you know everything about them, especially in this digital world as cash is seemingly being phased out. Take car insurance as an example. If an entity knows when someone’s insurance expires, it can start showing that person car insurance ads or upselling them. When a client pays for, say, a COVID-19 test, you can begin advertising therapeutics to them. You can also know how many children a person has, their gender, and so on.
European banks sell this data within the purview of the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR. This data is a huge profit center for banks. And that value could grow to be far greater than what the bank earns from transaction commissions, credit conditions and its old profit centers.
Related: GDPR and blockchain: Is the new EU data protection regulation a threat or an incentive?
The financial history of their clients brings immense value to the banks, and the banks know it. That’s why they are so focused on big data and artificial intelligence. It is not only banks, to be sure, that have sensitive data on their customers. Mobile carriers, too, for instance, could know where their clients are at all times. While GDPR is a step in the right direction, it should be stricter for this reason. Perhaps, companies working with private data should be required to obtain insurance.
It is time for big banks to move beyond new furniture and truly innovate. Regardless of how ergonomic the branch’s new couch is, the world is demanding better banking. And by partnering with crypto startups, big banks will be able to offer improved efficiency and user privacy.
When banks finally come to improve their technology experience, they go no deeper than changing the front end. They’ll make a button blue instead of green or create rounded edges on buttons instead of square ones. They think in terms of their interfaces, not the back end. If a bank were to truly innovate its technology, it’d dig deeper into the back end and transform its legacy technical infrastructure, which has been the same for decades. Few today even know how to work on those old programming languages of yesteryear, such as COBOL, so they’re stuck with upgrades that turn the software into a Frankenstein-esque abomination.
The big banks don’t do innovation in house. Big tech conglomerates don’t even innovate. They acquire new ideas, innovations and teams that have done the innovation already. When they want a new, undeveloped technology as part of their internal technology portfolio, they sometimes speak to journalists about it so that they start covering it, which gains interest from the market. And then startups begin working on the problem. They see the opportunity and start raising funds in an attempt to execute, and big tech companies just observe. And then, one or two years later, they acquire the best company in the space and make it a part of their conglomerates.
The traditional model for Big Tech development strategy is to acquire already successful startups, as they can do this without any risk. They pay a bit more, but they don’t have a risk of failure. The startup and its investors take on all the risk. Facebook, for example, bought Instagram in 2012 and WhatsApp in 2014 for exactly this reason. And these purchases led to serious concerns about Facebook’s “data monopoly.”
Financial companies take this approach, as well. All the big players have acceleration programs for this reason. They find startups, which have ideas they might want to incorporate in the future, and they provide them with certain resources. Big financial institutions then buy the ideas once they are developed so as to implement them.
Related: Banks must establish infrastructure for digital assets before it’s too late
If a big bank tried to implement a new technology in-house, it might not work. The corporate structure is so rigid, it can’t adapt to new innovations woven into the framework of the bank’s already existing technology and protocols. Without the agility and flexibility, it can’t take the risk of developing and incorporating new technologies. The corporate structure does not innovate well. It commercially adopts — that is, co-opts — much of the innovation it needs through mergers and acquisitions.
Fintech innovations
Banks should focus on implementing the innovations of the fintech world — particularly, those that ensure customer privacy and provide secure purchases. When the bank tries to acquire products, it should acquire the team and the corporate infrastructure, as well. That’s how the bank could begin smoothly changing its core processes. Examples of this already exist. In one model, the bank arranges secure purchases while working with personal data and transactions, while a fintech acquires customers and provides customer service.
Related: Crypto banks are going to swallow fiat banks in 3 years — or even less
The revised Payment Services Directive 2 initiative, commonly referred to as PSD2, is a European regulation for electronic payment services, aiming to make payments more secure and boost innovation in Europe. PSD2 divides all the financial businesses into two parts: the first one is infrastructure and security, and the second one is the front end and innovative customer care. This is a better approach for now, but in the future, improvements will be demanded.
Small payment services such as Revolut, Monzo, N26 and others are growing very fast. These startups are based on traditional financial structure — leaning on the banking licenses and payment service provider licenses of their partners — while incorporating innovations from the fintech world. These digital banks develop their competitive advantage and acquire customers in short order. This model works. Banks sit on a banking license and money and provide security while outsourcing a share of customer acquisition and customer care to leading fintech startups. This same model could bridge the gap between banks and crypto startups, as well.
Users’ privacy
When it comes to modern innovations, what should banks focus on incorporating? The answer is that on the current technological backbone deployed by banks, there isn’t a lot of user privacy. When we use a bank’s services, a staff member there still works with our transaction history, obtaining more information than is on our social media profiles. Who likes it when someone has access to such sensitive data? Probably nobody. Regardless, banks currently sell this data and information. In certain jurisdictions, they can sell information about personal transactions.
When you have the transaction history of a user, you know everything about them, especially in this digital world as cash is seemingly being phased out. Take car insurance as an example. If an entity knows when someone’s insurance expires, it can start showing that person car insurance ads or upselling them. When a client pays for, say, a COVID-19 test, you can begin advertising therapeutics to them. You can also know how many children a person has, their gender, and so on.
European banks sell this data within the purview of the General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR. This data is a huge profit center for banks. And that value could grow to be far greater than what the bank earns from transaction commissions, credit conditions and its old profit centers.
Related: GDPR and blockchain: Is the new EU data protection regulation a threat or an incentive?
The financial history of their clients brings immense value to the banks, and the banks know it. That’s why they are so focused on big data and artificial intelligence. It is not only banks, to be sure, that have sensitive data on their customers. Mobile carriers, too, for instance, could know where their clients are at all times. While GDPR is a step in the right direction, it should be stricter for this reason. Perhaps, companies working with private data should be required to obtain insurance.
It is time for big banks to move beyond new furniture and truly innovate. Regardless of how ergonomic the branch’s new couch is, the world is demanding better banking. And by partnering with crypto startups, big banks will be able to offer improved efficiency and user privacy.
Hello. What does vta and btc have to do with it? What do you compare an elephant and a bug? I don't understand why we need to discuss this.
Hello i think this news might help us .
https://cointelegraph.com/news/institutional-money-may-propel-bitcoin-to-250k-in-one-year-s-time-says-macro-investor
Bitcoin may hit $150,000 by November 2021, according to Raoul Pal, founder and CEO of Global Macro Investor and Real Vision — and that would be the most conservative scenario. Pal believes that Bitcoin could even reach $250,000 due to the large amount of institutional money currently flowing into the Bitcoin market.
That is what, according to Pal, makes the latest Bitcoin rally fundamentally different from 2017’s crypto bubble, which is believed to have been driven mainly by retail investors.
According to Pal, most of Bitcoin's additional supply is currently being absorbed by PayPal, Square — which recently adopted crypto services — and Grayscale. He believes that the resulting supply squeeze is the catalyst for Bitcoin’s latest surge.
“I've never seen a market with this supply and demand imbalance before”, Pal said, pointing out the macroeconomic factors that are playing in Bitcoin’s favor.
Despite news on the coronavirus vaccine sparking hopes of a quick economic recovery, governments will likely need to release additional monetary stimulus to sustain their economies. That, according to Pal, will lead to a devaluation of fiat. He believes that this together with low interest rates will propel Bitcoin's price to new highs.
"It's life-changing. No other asset has an upside of 5x, 10x, 20x in a short space of time," he stated.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/institutional-money-may-propel-bitcoin-to-250k-in-one-year-s-time-says-macro-investor
Bitcoin may hit $150,000 by November 2021, according to Raoul Pal, founder and CEO of Global Macro Investor and Real Vision — and that would be the most conservative scenario. Pal believes that Bitcoin could even reach $250,000 due to the large amount of institutional money currently flowing into the Bitcoin market.
That is what, according to Pal, makes the latest Bitcoin rally fundamentally different from 2017’s crypto bubble, which is believed to have been driven mainly by retail investors.
According to Pal, most of Bitcoin's additional supply is currently being absorbed by PayPal, Square — which recently adopted crypto services — and Grayscale. He believes that the resulting supply squeeze is the catalyst for Bitcoin’s latest surge.
“I've never seen a market with this supply and demand imbalance before”, Pal said, pointing out the macroeconomic factors that are playing in Bitcoin’s favor.
Despite news on the coronavirus vaccine sparking hopes of a quick economic recovery, governments will likely need to release additional monetary stimulus to sustain their economies. That, according to Pal, will lead to a devaluation of fiat. He believes that this together with low interest rates will propel Bitcoin's price to new highs.
"It's life-changing. No other asset has an upside of 5x, 10x, 20x in a short space of time," he stated.
Jump to: