We have to get services to accept bitcoin directly. I mean, if we're willing to give our identity away (KYC) and pay high fees (comparing debit cards to crypto), then why use bitcoin in the first place? Personally, I don't see this helping bitcoin in any way.
I agree--there's no anonymity and I don't think there's any advantage to this service that Visa is offering. It's basically just a way for Visa (and probably Coinbase as well) to extract fees from their customers. Same old story that's been going on since the beginning of credit cards, right?
Nice to see bitcoin gaining wider adoption--or
possibly doing so--but I'm not sure this is going to catch on.
And I also agree that it would be so much better if merchants took bitcoin directly, but there's an obvious volatility risk involved, and I can understand why they wouldn't want to do that. Even payment processors only convert bitcoin to fiat, which is what the merchant receives. If I'm not mistaken, there are a few businesses that take crypto directly. Overstock, Veldt Gold, and Protonmail are three of those, though I'm not sure if any of them still receive crypto directly.
Because at times KYC does not matter and having a hold over a merchant is good.
Using a CC a times with an online vendor you do not 100% trust is not a bad thing.
If you are ordering something they know where you live anyway.
Most of the time yeah, paying with
BTC is better.
Sometimes other ways are better.
Also a CC is useful for other things. (Hotel reservations / car rental / etc.)
-Dave