And I understand you can justify people being emotionally invested into a project, but to tell people to go eat a fuck stick and die? Can you really justify this as a response? Fair enough your explanation tells me why someone might respond to this in a certain way but this in no way justifies the responses, it merely gives reasons explaining them.
Your turd analogy is ... well.... a bit shit...(see what I did there
), the first thing that springs to mind is that the idea throwing turds at each other is somehow worth it? Look my take on this is that the core community members of eMunie are not kids,they are not supposed to be, they are more akin to parental figures of a community, that by default is starved from open information . When a child throws a turd at a parent is it really the best way to deal with it to throw the turd back at a kid? At the end of the day I was just pointing out that the founding community members of eMunie shouldn't turn into two kids throwing turds at other kids. There are claims and there will always be claims that don't add up and this arises because eMunie is a closed system. The public has no access to any information other than snippets on the forum. The claim that is of concern is not that a kid has called eMunie a scam. It is the idea that we have conflicting snippets of information that don't(didn't?) add up. There were low download counts and a high claim of 600 BTC invested. People are worried about eMunie stealing peoples investment and this is reasonable considering how much money has been stolen through bit coin scams in the past. What would be even more reasonable is if this was handled with a bit more care, how are we supposed to know what is really happening under the hood of eMunie? This would not happen if eMunie was an open transparent system. Until this happens(which might not be for a very long time) the community members are the only ones that can clear up discrepancies with information.
