Topic: Vod trolling me with red tag! (Read 1213 times)
I'm locking this thread, I'm no longer troll tagged by Vod.
So Vod decided to tag me after I tagged him?
These rogue individuals literally turned the trust system into some kind of joke.
Obvious case of retaliatory feedback. honestly none of you can see what they are doing? trust is moderated by DT members and they would do whatever they want while nobody, I mean nobody is questioning them. clear evidence of abuse of non-DT members by this gang.
-scammed sone guy https://twitter.com/Promote_Ethical
I was hired as a contractor to upgrade a network, and they ended up firing their IT guy and hiring me. :/
Not really my fault, but I always understood why he was upset.
@xSplit, we're not in a family picnic here, this forum is also not a place where people should be worried about their kids, we're adults here and we are trying to revolutionize the economic section. what I am trying to do here is to establish a fair system for everybody and not just myself.
Did you get raped by Vod? if yes then I'd suggest you to go to the police and form a legal complaint against Vod, otherwise this is not the place to attack Vod's personal life. I'm trying to criticize his tagging habits, nothing more and nothing less.
Did you get raped by Vod? if yes then I'd suggest you to go to the police and form a legal complaint against Vod, otherwise this is not the place to attack Vod's personal life. I'm trying to criticize his tagging habits, nothing more and nothing less.
why should I ignore a report online saying he is a pedo?
Because anyone can create anonymous accounts and type anything they want. The only truth there is the work info stolen off my linkedin profile. :/
Now, goodbye bozo.
Quote
And since you were raised a catholic it is not even surprising to be honest lol
@xSplit, we're not in a family picnic here, this forum is also not a place where people should be worried about their kids, we're adults here and we are trying to revolutionize the economic section. what I am trying to do here is to establish a fair system for everybody and not just myself.
Did you get raped by Vod? if yes then I'd suggest you to go to the police and form a legal complaint against Vod, otherwise this is not the place to attack Vod's personal life. I'm trying to criticize his tagging habits, nothing more and nothing less.
Did you get raped by Vod? if yes then I'd suggest you to go to the police and form a legal complaint against Vod, otherwise this is not the place to attack Vod's personal life. I'm trying to criticize his tagging habits, nothing more and nothing less.
why should I ignore a report online saying he is a pedo?
Because anyone can create anonymous accounts and type anything they want. The only truth there is the work info stolen off my linkedin profile. :/
Now, goodbye bozo.
@xSplit, we're not in a family picnic here, this forum is also not a place where people should be worried about their kids, we're adults here and we are trying to revolutionize the economic section. what I am trying to do here is to establish a fair system for everybody and not just myself.
Did you get raped by Vod? if yes then I'd suggest you to go to the police and form a legal complaint against Vod, otherwise this is not the place to attack Vod's personal life. I'm trying to criticize his tagging habits, nothing more and nothing less.
Did you get raped by Vod? if yes then I'd suggest you to go to the police and form a legal complaint against Vod, otherwise this is not the place to attack Vod's personal life. I'm trying to criticize his tagging habits, nothing more and nothing less.
Since he doesn't care about being fair but only about being an asshole I am doing the same, why should I ignore a report online saying he is a pedo? Only because he deems the website not trusteworthy? Well I consider him not trusteworthy
@xSplit, we're not in a family picnic here, this forum is also not a place where people should be worried about their kids, we're adults here and we are trying to revolutionize the economic section. what I am trying to do here is to establish a fair system for everybody and not just myself.
Did you get raped by Vod? if yes then I'd suggest you to go to the police and form a legal complaint against Vod, otherwise this is not the place to attack Vod's personal life. I'm trying to criticize his tagging habits, nothing more and nothing less.
Did you get raped by Vod? if yes then I'd suggest you to go to the police and form a legal complaint against Vod, otherwise this is not the place to attack Vod's personal life. I'm trying to criticize his tagging habits, nothing more and nothing less.
I was banned seven days for spreading out the link I found in your reputation where you acted like a pedo
You mean where someone claimed I acted like a pedo...
That's the worst thing in the world you can call someone. It's certain no wonder
No one believes it anyway.
I don't think this bozo has learned his lesson. Let him spread the link on a new account.
Well I think everyone should know the truth about you, since I can't post the link here I will send it via PM, hopefully you don't rape my little cousin meanwhile
I was banned seven days for spreading out the link I found in your reputation where you acted like a pedo
You mean where someone claimed I acted like a pedo...
That's the worst thing in the world you can call someone. It's certain no wonder
No one believes it anyway.
I don't think this bozo has learned his lesson. Let him spread his lies on a new account.
I'll try to bump this thread periodically too
how is it that other DT members are countering your valid negative trust on Anduck but they don't give a damn about this one?
He has contributed a lot more to the community than you have.
+9 > +7 therefore trust abuse
Uh oh.... I believe it is a felony for a DT member to use alts unless you pay
I only advised him to do a few things based on the circumstances, nobody has ever used my service, calling me a scammer without knowing if I'm capable of providing a service or not is a false accusation.
Let us not go off topic here, the fact still remains that Vod is a trust abuser and should get kicked out from his position.
You advised him to bribe Lauda in an indirect way, but still it was an advice telling him to bribe Lauda. And a bribe doesn't always have a monetary value. Let us not go off topic here, the fact still remains that Vod is a trust abuser and should get kicked out from his position.
And the tag that Vod has given you is legitimate enough.
+9 > +7 therefore trust abuse
What I want from you is that you need to forgive Anduck if he is not bidding on his own auctions since 2 years ago, instead actmyname and DarkStar_ undermined you and Anduck got 2 undeserved green trust. if only you could give a second chance to Anduck, none of this would've happened. you see my point?
Trust: 70: -0 / +7 looks much better than Trust: 1: -1 / +9.
Just saying.
What I want from you is that you need to forgive Anduck if he is not bidding on his own auctions since 2 years ago, instead actmyname and DarkStar_ undermined you and Anduck got 2 undeserved green trust. if only you could give a second chance to Anduck, none of this would've happened. you see my point?
Trust: 70: -0 / +7 looks much better than Trust: 1: -1 / +9.
Just saying.
Now do I need to go and farm some trust from other DT members just to get a counter tag? because I have seen this happening a lot here, somebody is getting a tag and even for a valid and good reason, next day or week he/she has a green trust score like nothing has happened.
You have seen this happening a lot? Name the users.What I want from you is that you need to forgive Anduck if he is not bidding on his own auctions since 2 years ago, instead actmyname and DarkStar_ undermined you and Anduck got 2 undeserved green trust.
My rating cancelled out Vod's. This made Anduck neutral. Capische? NEUTRAL. Let us not go off topic here
Now I've seen everything.
In addition to "delusions of grandeur" and "querulous paranoia", I think we can safely add "anterograde amnesia" to the list of things digaran should be asking his doctor to test him for.
Because you don't have the ability to remove red trust.
I never said that I have.
You had this in your signature:
https://i.snag.gy/pu5ZQM.jpg
Because you don't have the ability to remove red trust.
I never said that I have. I'm also not a DT member, being a DT member and saying that I will remove or counter people's feedback in exchange for money could be a valid reason to tag me with red for it.
Let us not go off topic here, you have tried to retaliate against me, how is it that other DT members are countering your valid negative trust on Anduck but they don't give a damn about this one? however if somebody does that, I would then tag them with red for misusing the trust system. I haven't done any sucking and ass kissing or trading(trust farming) to deserve a green trust from anybody here. unless somebody could provide a convincing reason as to why they are trusting me with green default trust, otherwise tagging me with green would be a misuse of trust system.
Now do I need to go and farm some trust from other DT members just to get a counter tag? because I have seen this happening a lot here, somebody is getting a tag and even for a valid and good reason, next day or week he/she has a green trust score like nothing has happened. you call that decentralized system? I call that trust farming like for example Anduck has farmed some green trust without even asking for it. you seem like to have a thick skin man, people would counter your valid negative trust then you'd go act like a noob and would tag them with green, WTF?
What I want from you is that you need to forgive Anduck if he is not bidding on his own auctions since 2 years ago, instead actmyname and DarkStar_ undermined you and Anduck got 2 undeserved green trust. if only you could give a second chance to Anduck, none of this would've happened. you see my point?
I'm asking you please, give him another chance and let us not fight about this unimportant matter, what we need to do is to save this community from real scammers(ICOs) and not to fight with each other all the time.
Here's the evidence you are a scammer: You tried to charge people for a service you couldn't provide. That's pretty much textbook scamming.
How do you know I'm not capable of providing said service?
You don't know how the trust system works. You're inventing your own rules that don't make any sense for anyone except you. You're fighting a meaningless battle against valid uses of the trust system. You're spamming the trust system with repugnant garbage. You're perpetuating conspiracy theories that would likely damage a potential case rather than help it.
That's what you're capable of providing. Is that your "service"?
Here's the evidence you are a scammer: You tried to charge people for a service you couldn't provide. That's pretty much textbook scamming.
How do you know I'm not capable of providing said service?
Because you don't have the ability to remove red trust.
Why do you think he did that?
I only advised him to do a few things based on the circumstances, nobody has ever used my service, calling me a scammer without knowing if I'm capable of providing a service or not is a false accusation.
Let us not go off topic here, the fact still remains that Vod is a trust abuser and should get kicked out from his position.
Here's the evidence you are a scammer: You tried to charge people for a service you couldn't provide. That's pretty much textbook scamming.
How do you know I'm not capable of providing said service?
None of your cases are based on your clients, infact you have 0 clients. Your first possible client turned you down. Why do you think he did that?
Here's the evidence you are a scammer: You tried to charge people for a service you couldn't provide. That's pretty much textbook scamming.
How do you know I'm not capable of providing said service?
Do you have a single shred of evidence of me being a scammer? are you going to base your accusation on trust feedbacks left on me by some ordinary people? you seem to put a lot of faith and trust into trust system, you are willingly blinding yourself to the truth, you want to believe whatever DT members say and do is the right thing to say and do, so much of a narrow minded individual you are.
There is no belief needed. All DT ratings that you got have reference links so anyone can make up their mind as to how trustworthy you are.
Fun fact: The trust ratings you received from DT members point to your own words incriminating yourself. On the other hand, your retaliatory ratings point to your own words smearing said DT members with no actual substance. You're trying to create an alternate reality where your fantasies become facts and you're failing horribly.
Do you have a single shred of evidence of me being a scammer? are you going to base your accusation on trust feedbacks left on me by some ordinary people? you seem to put a lot of faith and trust into trust system, you are willingly blinding yourself to the truth, you want to believe whatever DT members say and do is the right thing to say and do, so much of a narrow minded individual you are.
I'll take that as a "no" to having any evidence then.
Here's the evidence you are a scammer: You tried to charge people for a service you couldn't provide. That's pretty much textbook scamming.
Somebody with multiple accounts
Do you have a single shred of evidence?
somebody who thinks that people are stupid
No, I just think you are stupid.
You can't find: scammer in any of my ratings left on my profile by DT members.
Just because they don't use the word scammer, doesn't mean they don't think you are one. I'm not surprised you are unable to read between the lines since you can't comprehend basic facts.
Do you have a single shred of evidence of me being a scammer? are you going to base your accusation on trust feedbacks left on me by some ordinary people? you seem to put a lot of faith and trust into trust system, you are willingly blinding yourself to the truth, you want to believe whatever DT members say and do is the right thing to say and do, so much of a narrow minded individual you are.
Somebody with multiple accounts
Do you have a single shred of evidence?
somebody who thinks that people are stupid
No, I just think you are stupid.
You can't find: scammer in any of my ratings left on my profile by DT members.
Just because they don't use the word scammer, doesn't mean they don't think you are one. I'm not surprised you are unable to read between the lines since you can't comprehend basic facts.
So all of you have pussied out? none of you is talking about Vod's tag on me. because 9 from 10 are just pussies in this forum.
Have you considered the possibility that the reason none of us are talking about Vod's tag is because we all agree with him that you are a scammer, spammer and troll?
Look who is talking, somebody with multiple accounts cheating in signature campaigns, somebody who thinks that people are stupid and can't see him/her for what he/she really is.
You can't find: scammer in any of my ratings left on my profile by DT members. Vod is a trust abuser and has left me a negative trust in retaliation, if you want to be his little bitch, be my guest and stay as his little cute bitch.
So all of you have pussied out? none of you is talking about Vod's tag on me. because 9 from 10 are just pussies in this forum. I call people like you cowards, when you see somebody powerful(in your own opinion) is doing shit to others you would do more shit to others just to make that somebody happy, to make that somebody someday tag you with some green trust and say that "good guy" "good forum member" "this member fights against spam and scam".
Are you getting carried away again?
Guys I'm begging you, ask Vod to un-tag me. I only got a hold over seclog recently, so I got carried away.
See that's why you're fundamentally untrustworthy. Nobody knows when you're gonna fly off the handle again.
Let's not also forget his utterly nonsense negative trusts that claim changing an email address is somehow 100% proof that the account has either been sold or hacked.
That is not a valid assumption to make, changing of email addresses of their account does not necessarily mean they have sold the account to someone, it only means that they have changed their email. One of the reasons I think is of course for security purposes and confidentiality of their original email address. For instance marlboroza didn't even changed his password when he has changed his email address. Also Bitcointalk giving you the ability to change your email means that you are allowed to do so. Vod is not fit to be on DT he is consistently abusing other people with his red tags. in this case Vod is trying to moderate the trust system directly. I'm a non-DT member, what I do and whom I tag is none of Vod's business, yet he tagged me to say that he wants to bully me and to retaliate against my tag on him.
I suggest that you need to accept the fact that you had tagged from DT members. You ain't earned red tagged if that reporter does't have solid proof to make a red trust. If I am on your situation, I will accept it. Instead of make reputation fighting/debate to them. Learn about the what you experienced here. That is the better for you. 
none of you is talking about Vod's tag on me.
Maybe nobody apart from you cares. This might be a shock to you but a tiresome troll getting yet another red tag isn't particularly interesting.
So all of you have pussied out? none of you is talking about Vod's tag on me. because 9 from 10 are just pussies in this forum.
Have you considered the possibility that the reason none of us are talking about Vod's tag is because we all agree with him that you are a scammer, spammer and troll?
"if" I was DT I would tag you every single day with a long winded ramble.
you are not to be trusted.. end of, move on - have a tear wank!
you are not to be trusted.. end of, move on - have a tear wank!
So all of you have pussied out? none of you is talking about Vod's tag on me. because 9 from 10 are just pussies in this forum. I call people like you cowards, when you see somebody powerful(in your own opinion) is doing shit to others you would do more shit to others just to make that somebody happy, to make that somebody someday tag you with some green trust and say that "good guy" "good forum member" "this member fights against spam and scam".
Here is my message to you all:
Guys, girls, whatever you have and see in this world will be gone someday, only what you do and what you decide to do with your life matters and will remain with you forever.
For once in your life, talk against tyranny and see how good it feels.
Here is my message to you all:
Guys, girls, whatever you have and see in this world will be gone someday, only what you do and what you decide to do with your life matters and will remain with you forever.
For once in your life, talk against tyranny and see how good it feels.
Well my don DarkStar_, theymos said that to avoid kicking DT members from their positions all the time, but if you see that a DT member has a habit of countering only some feedbacks and not some others, it could result in favoritism and eventually a total misuse of default trust.
Of course not all ratings need to be countered... that wouldn't make any sense. You're fighting against a legitimate use of the trust system.
Vod is blackmailing Anduck just to get his own red tag removed.
Except Anduck offered for them to both remove their tags on each other and Vod refused, so your statement is 100%, undeniably incorrect.
I'm sure that everybody could see this.
You keep repeating this yet ironically enough when EVERYONE responds and tells you they do not see this, you simply ignore them and continue to repeat your nonsense...
You're a persistent little troll, I do have to give you that!
Or like, to keep the trust system somewhat decentralized?
Favoritism=centralized trust system.
And how does actmyname fit into this? I'm not aware of another similar case.
Favoritism=centralized trust system.
And why is this? One does not have to trade to disagree with a trust rating.
Favoritism=centralized trust system.
There's no requirement to have the same beliefs as everyone else
Same end result: favoritism=centralized trust system.
Furthermore, I would like to point to the fact that Vod is trying to blackmail Anduck and myself with his red tags, first he said to Anduck that one of them has to remove the tag in order to come to an agreement for removing both of their tags=personal use of default trust system, Vod is blackmailing Anduck just to get his own red tag removed. then Vod tags me 2 days after I tagged him, this is clear evidence of retaliatory feedback, I'm sure that everybody could see this.
theymos said that to avoid kicking DT members from their positions all the time
Or like, to keep the trust system somewhat decentralized?
if you see that a DT member has a habit of countering only some feedbacks and not some others, it could result in favoritism and eventually a total misuse of default trust.
And how does actmyname fit into this? I'm not aware of another similar case.
Let us take the case of Anduck, if we could agree that Vod has tagged Anduck out of despite and foolishness, what we need to do is to ask either Blazed or some other DT who has a green tag on Anduck to re-enforce a previously left green tag on Anduck to counter Vod's unjust feedback
And why is this? One does not have to trade to disagree with a trust rating.
also a DT member has to tag Vod for his misbehavior if we are going to counter Vod's feedback.
So because an individual believes that someone has made poor judgement for a single rating, that someone should be seen as untrustworthy? There's no requirement to have the same beliefs as everyone else (again, better decentralization).
I am also willing to give actmyname a chance if he admits that countering Vod's feedback without having any past dealings with Anduck was wrong.
Why is it wrong? From theymos himself (who you believed should have 100% control the trust network):
It's entirely legitimate to give someone a new positive rating just to negate a negative rating. (In this case you should explicitly respond to the negative rating you're negating.)
Well my don DarkStar_, theymos said that to avoid kicking DT members from their positions all the time, but if you see that a DT member has a habit of countering only some feedbacks and not some others, it could result in favoritism and eventually a total misuse of default trust.
Let us take the case of Anduck, if we could agree that Vod has tagged Anduck out of despite and foolishness, what we need to do is to ask either Blazed or some other DT who has a green tag on Anduck to re-enforce a previously left green tag on Anduck to counter Vod's unjust feedback and also a DT member has to tag Vod for his misbehavior if we are going to counter Vod's feedback.
I am also willing to give actmyname a chance if he admits that countering Vod's feedback without having any past dealings with Anduck was wrong.
Why is it wrong? From theymos himself (who you believed should have 100% control the trust network):
It's entirely legitimate to give someone a new positive rating just to negate a negative rating. (In this case you should explicitly respond to the negative rating you're negating.)
I am also willing to give actmyname a chance if he admits that countering Vod's feedback without having any past dealings with Anduck was wrong.
I have already put down my thoughts about your idea of this "abuse".1) You do not know if I have had any past dealings with Anduck
2) Past dealings with Anduck don't actually matter when concerning feedback
3) Countering the feedback still leaves the negative there.
You have already said that both Vod and my feedbacks toward Anduck were cases of abusing the trust system. I don't understand why you wouldn't want someone to counter an abusive negative trust, though.
Where is the lie? show me and then see if I am willing to remove a false negative feedback or not.
"Vod has given actmyname positive trust because actmyname has tried to hide the truth from the public by countering Vod's negative feedback on Anduck"
"After getting on DT2 it seems that marlboroza account has changed hands. this is bad and it is clearly an evidence of a deeper corruption within trust system of this forum."
"Misuse/abuse of DT position. untrustworthy behavior. this person shouldn't hold any power, because he is corrupted and doesn't know how to use DT power he has over 99.99% of people in this forum."
Let's start with those.
Seeing how you ignored the response to the bolded part - I take it you lied again and you're not going to remove the lies from your feedback?
I would change my negative trust on matlboroza because I have to admit that I was too harsh on him, yes I am willing to change my tag on him to neutral just in case if he ever reset his password, we could have a reference as to when he has changed his email address. regarding Vod's feedback:
I am willing to give him a chance if I see that he is willing to admit that tagging actmyname with some green was a misuse of the trust this community has given him. I am also willing to give actmyname a chance if he admits that countering Vod's feedback without having any past dealings with Anduck was wrong.
I am constantly changing my methods and I am trying to improve myself based on the reactions from the community members. some DT members are not like that unfortunately, they would tag somebody and would leave them for dead.
Where is the lie? show me and then see if I am willing to remove a false negative feedback or not.
"Vod has given actmyname positive trust because actmyname has tried to hide the truth from the public by countering Vod's negative feedback on Anduck"
"After getting on DT2 it seems that marlboroza account has changed hands. this is bad and it is clearly an evidence of a deeper corruption within trust system of this forum."
"Misuse/abuse of DT position. untrustworthy behavior. this person shouldn't hold any power, because he is corrupted and doesn't know how to use DT power he has over 99.99% of people in this forum."
Let's start with those.
Seeing how you ignored the response to the bolded part - I take it you lied again and you're not going to remove the lies from your feedback?
Blah blah blah
I'm not a DT member, my feedback is untrusted and you could read the references yourself.
About 90 day tag, if those people stay after getting tagged, maybe we should give them another chance, 90 days is enough time to test them, don't you think?
Let's not also forget his utterly nonsense negative trusts that claim changing an email address is somehow 100% proof that the account has either been sold or hacked.
whom I tag is none of Vod's business
Going around lying on trust ratings and leaving false negative feedback is a pretty untrustworthy thing to do, and it is completely reasonable to expect to be tagged for it.
Where is the lie? show me and then see if I am willing to remove a false negative feedback or not. DT members are not going to remove their false negative feedback. that's all I want, I want them to forgive people, I want them to remove their false tags on me and on anybody else.
"Vod has given actmyname positive trust because actmyname has tried to hide the truth from the public by countering Vod's negative feedback on Anduck"
"After getting on DT2 it seems that marlboroza account has changed hands. this is bad and it is clearly an evidence of a deeper corruption within trust system of this forum."
"Misuse/abuse of DT position. untrustworthy behavior. this person shouldn't hold any power, because he is corrupted and doesn't know how to use DT power he has over 99.99% of people in this forum."
Let's start with those.
You also have a shitload of spammy negatives like "90 day tag" and "see ref" without any explanation.
whom I tag is none of Vod's business
Going around lying on trust ratings and leaving false negative feedback is a pretty untrustworthy thing to do, and it is completely reasonable to expect to be tagged for it.
Where is the lie? show me and then see if I am willing to remove a false negative feedback or not. DT members are not going to remove their false negative feedback. that's all I want, I want them to forgive people, I want them to remove their false tags on me and on anybody else.
what I do and whom I tag is none of Vod's business, yet he tagged me to say that he wants to bully me and to retaliate against my tag on him.
What I do and whom I tag is none of your business, yet you harass me here and try to bully me and retaliate against my tag on you.
whom I tag is none of Vod's business
Going around lying on trust ratings and leaving false negative feedback is a pretty untrustworthy thing to do, and it is completely reasonable to expect to be tagged for it.
Vod is not fit to be on DT he is consistently abusing other people with his red tags. in this case Vod is trying to moderate the trust system directly. I'm a non-DT member, what I do and whom I tag is none of Vod's business, yet he tagged me to say that he wants to bully me and to retaliate against my tag on him.
So Vod tell us the truth, are you an account/trust farmer? you seem to be out of garbage posters band, are you earning money by some other means? like leaving positive trust for accounts and then selling them for money?
I only operate this one account, other than the automated bot for BPIP.
You keep reaching, bozo.
The fact that you want to tag every user that changes their email address means you are the idiot.
Enough said.
why don't you just leave the forum?
Because I believe in Bitcoin. therefore I wont leave simply because a bunch of people have lost their ways.
why don't you just leave the forum?
bozo.
Don't call me by your name.
Anybody who reads the reference would realize who you really are. an account farmer and trust farmer. you have so many positive feedback with no reference for people and I am sure if we dig a little deeper we'll find that most of them have changed email/password somewhere in time.
So Vod tell us the truth, are you an account/trust farmer? you seem to be out of garbage posters band, are you earning money by some other means? like leaving positive trust for accounts and then selling them for money?
Because it seems that everybody is here to earn money, I'm too here to earn money but that's not the primary goal for me here.
The fact that you want to tag every user that changes their email address means you are the idiot.
Enough said.
Enough said.
Great, now you are tagging not only untrustworthy people but you have decided to tag anybody you deem as an idiot?
Idiots are not trustworthy bozo.
The fact that you want to tag every user that changes their email address means you are the idiot.
Enough said.
Enough said.
Great, now you are tagging not only untrustworthy people but you have decided to tag anybody you deem as an idiot?
I would strongly suggest you look inward instead of lashing out at people here.
He has a flat Earther approach to discussion - he's the only one who is right, everyone else is wrong, and no amount of evidence will change his mind.
Good to see that the only thing that has changed in 3 weeks since I first pointed this out is that he now has even more negative trust. Any hope that he would change his ways is long gone. He seems intent on burning every bridge he can find.
What bridges? bridges of becoming a little bitch for DT members? Vod has been abusing other people for years, this tag on me is yet another evidence. he has tagged accounts with green and those accounts have changed hands since. I called him on his shady activity before, however he decided to troll-tag me after I tagged him for misusing the trust system. he couldn't wait to tag me.
He doesn't deserve to be on DT, because he is unable to judge people fairly. every single DT member with similar behavior doesn't deserve to be on DT. end of story.
So Vod decided to tag me after I tagged him?
So you decide to tag me a year after I change my email address? To stop spam from the forum?
Idiot.
Who is the idiot here? I never tagged you for changing your email, obvious troll.
The fact that you want to tag every user that changes their email address means you are the idiot.
Enough said.
I would strongly suggest you look inward instead of lashing out at people here.
He has a flat Earther approach to discussion - he's the only one who is right, everyone else is wrong, and no amount of evidence will change his mind.
Good to see that the only thing that has changed in 3 weeks since I first pointed this out is that he now has even more negative trust. Any hope that he would change his ways is long gone. He seems intent on burning every bridge he can find.
What bridges? bridges of becoming a little bitch for DT members? Vod has been abusing other people for years, this tag on me is yet another evidence. he has tagged accounts with green and those accounts have changed hands since. I called him on his shady activity before, however he decided to troll-tag me after I tagged him for misusing the trust system. he couldn't wait to tag me.
He doesn't deserve to be on DT, because he is unable to judge people fairly. every single DT member with similar behavior doesn't deserve to be on DT. end of story.
So Vod decided to tag me after I tagged him?
So you decide to tag me a year after I change my email address? To stop spam from the forum?
Idiot.
Who is the idiot here? I never tagged you for changing your email, obvious troll.
So Vod decided to tag me after I tagged him?
So you decide to tag me a year after I change my email address? To stop spam from the forum?
Idiot.
I would strongly suggest you look inward instead of lashing out at people here.
He has a flat Earther approach to discussion - he's the only one who is right, everyone else is wrong, and no amount of evidence will change his mind.
Good to see that the only thing that has changed in 3 weeks since I first pointed this out is that he now has even more negative trust. Any hope that he would change his ways is long gone. He seems intent on burning every bridge he can find.
What you said isn't true, however--there are plenty of people questioning red tags left by DT members. Usually those who have a problem with it are scammers and spammers, so nobody really takes them seriously.
If a DT member consistently leaves feedbacks that are obviously using bad judgement, they'll get booted from DT. I've seen it happen, though not in quite some time, and I can't remember the names of users who did get ousted. Since Vod is not the only DT member to have tagged you, I would strongly suggest you look inward instead of lashing out at people here. I think a lot of people have been telling you the same thing, but you keep repeating the same mentally ill gestures and you keep getting the same result.
If a DT member consistently leaves feedbacks that are obviously using bad judgement, they'll get booted from DT. I've seen it happen, though not in quite some time, and I can't remember the names of users who did get ousted. Since Vod is not the only DT member to have tagged you, I would strongly suggest you look inward instead of lashing out at people here. I think a lot of people have been telling you the same thing, but you keep repeating the same mentally ill gestures and you keep getting the same result.
Can't you see the reference and the comment of Vod's tag on me? he is obviously a troll, he is wrongfully tagging me here. if you decide to close your eyes to the truth, it's your problem.
What you said isn't true, however--there are plenty of people questioning red tags left by DT members. Usually those who have a problem with it are scammers and spammers, so nobody really takes them seriously.
If a DT member consistently leaves feedbacks that are obviously using bad judgement, they'll get booted from DT. I've seen it happen, though not in quite some time, and I can't remember the names of users who did get ousted. Since Vod is not the only DT member to have tagged you, I would strongly suggest you look inward instead of lashing out at people here. I think a lot of people have been telling you the same thing, but you keep repeating the same mentally ill gestures and you keep getting the same result.
If a DT member consistently leaves feedbacks that are obviously using bad judgement, they'll get booted from DT. I've seen it happen, though not in quite some time, and I can't remember the names of users who did get ousted. Since Vod is not the only DT member to have tagged you, I would strongly suggest you look inward instead of lashing out at people here. I think a lot of people have been telling you the same thing, but you keep repeating the same mentally ill gestures and you keep getting the same result.
So Vod decided to tag me after I tagged him?
These rogue individuals literally turned the trust system into some kind of joke.
Obvious case of retaliatory feedback. honestly none of you can see what they are doing? trust is moderated by DT members and they would do whatever they want while nobody, I mean nobody is questioning them. clear evidence of abuse of non-DT members by this gang.
Jump to: