Topic: 😬😬😬 (Read 2967 times)
Bump, I have just added OgNasty to the second post. no wonder suchmoon has countered OgNasty's red tags on people, I'm going to change my stance about suchmoon in a few weeks, first I need to evaluate the situation and I might even start commending suchmoon for countering OgNasty's tags, if he is going to stay on DT1 after abusing the trust system in so many ways then I only see one alternative to deal with this trust abuser: by countering every single red tags left on people by OgNasty except mine.
You are wrong, suchmoon has countered other red trusts to provide a cover for suspected extortionists and known account sellers. I can't trust such a person.
LOL, you don't trust someone for having an opinion... I'm guessing you're an Erdoğan voter?
Bump. we have a new winner: as always our DT2 member "suchmoon" this time has tried to counter a legitimate negative trust to provide a free pass for a known account seller, read the second post and case number 2 for suchmoon to understand the situation. this is the same suchmoon who tagged me 2 times for this thread. don't forget that.
Suchmoon didn't do anything wrong by countering h&co negative trusts for PG and YuTü.Co.in
H&co has his point of view and he is afraid that those accounts changed hands while suchmoon is sure that it isn't the case + the default loan story is solved tho.
You are wrong, suchmoon has countered other red trusts to provide a cover for suspected extortionists and known account sellers. I can't trust such a person.
Bump. we have a new winner: as always our DT2 member "suchmoon" this time has tried to counter a legitimate negative trust to provide a free pass for a known account seller, read the second post and case number 2 for suchmoon to understand the situation. this is the same suchmoon who tagged me 2 times for this thread. don't forget that.
Suchmoon didn't do anything wrong by countering h&co negative trusts for PG and YuTü.Co.in
H&co has his point of view and he is afraid that those accounts changed hands while suchmoon is sure that it isn't the case + the default loan story is solved tho.
Bump. we have a new winner: as always our DT2 member "suchmoon" this time has tried to counter a legitimate negative trust to provide a free pass for a known account seller, read the second post and case number 2 for suchmoon to understand the situation. this is the same suchmoon who tagged me 2 times for this thread. don't forget that.
You already have 6 cases. How could you possibly be bored?
I need some big fish here, those cases are low level crooks, they have been abusing other people for years and people are too coward to speak against them, don't get me wrong, I am on your side as long as you are good, we'll have a problem when people start misusing the trust system.
Merit wasn't my thing, trust is now my thing. I'm watching you suchmoon, be careful if you do something bad I will come after you. friendly warning.
I have a potential customer for you:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dt2-member-cryptodevil-tagging-bounty-participants-and-extorting-4432189
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dt2-member-cryptodevil-tagging-bounty-participants-and-extorting-4432189
Scam.
Better to keep your kids away from DT2 members?
Are we in a park walking here? what a joke. any serious case you have for me? I'm bored.
You already have 6 cases. How could you possibly be bored?
I have a potential customer for you:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dt2-member-cryptodevil-tagging-bounty-participants-and-extorting-4432189
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dt2-member-cryptodevil-tagging-bounty-participants-and-extorting-4432189
Scam.
Better to keep your kids away from DT2 members?
Are we in a park walking here? what a joke. any serious case you have for me? I'm bored.
I have a potential customer for you:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dt2-member-cryptodevil-tagging-bounty-participants-and-extorting-4432189
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dt2-member-cryptodevil-tagging-bounty-participants-and-extorting-4432189
So the 6 "cases" - why do you have them here? Particularly the ones that don't involve you.
My goal is to eradicate the habit of leaving inaccurate feedbacks on people. whether it to be positive or negative. what kind of a person would I be if I were only trying to get involved where my own profile was at stake? note that you tagged me even before I start. 2 new cases of Vod and actmyname could be considered as my new work in progress.
Note again: even if you remove your tags on me, there will be no fee for my service, one could conclude that I have eliminated all the possible ways of colluding with DT members. if you remove your tags on me I wont be getting any money for my service since it will remain free for ever.
Nobody is using my service yet.
Do you think that 6-pages of discussion and a month of operation without a single client is indicative of a successful service?
Any service that has followed this pattern in the past will tell you that it is time to close up shop, digaran.
Well, I have no advertisements on this forum, only way for people to know about my service is by visiting this section if they could see my thread.
About closing shop: not going to happen, I will not back down so easily.
Nobody is using my service yet.
Do you think that 6-pages of discussion and a month of operation without a single client is indicative of a successful service?
Any service that has followed this pattern in the past will tell you that it is time to close up shop, digaran.
I'm not asking what your opinions are, I've seen enough of that. What have you actually accomplished towards your stated goal? Have you removed any red trust? Have you removed anyone from DT? Do you even have any actual customers who would acknowledge that you're working on their "cases"?
Nobody is using my service yet.
So the 6 "cases" - why do you have them here? Particularly the ones that don't involve you.
2 other cases are completely voluntary and I have received no money for them.
Nobody is using my service yet.
What?
I have no other choice than publicly posting about the wrong doings of people
Except you do. You could PM the DT1 members in question. I suspect the reason you haven't is that you know that they will agree with everyone else over you.
I'm not asking what your opinions are, I've seen enough of that. What have you actually accomplished towards your stated goal? Have you removed any red trust? Have you removed anyone from DT? Do you even have any actual customers who would acknowledge that you're working on their "cases"?
Nobody is using my service yet.
Beside the three tags from you, marlboroza and actmyname, those 2 other cases are completely voluntary and I have received no money for them. thanks for asking.
Here is my argument:
If we could find a way to stop people from abusing other people with DT position they were given temporarily, we'll have a healthy community where people could do their businesses right.
I believe that Vod has misused the trust system by tagging Anduck with red after 2 years, actmyname misused the trust system by tagging Anduck with green without having any past dealings with Anduck, and I also believe that Vod has also misused the trust system by tagging actmyname with green after actmyname countered Vod's feedback on Anduck. however I am willing to forgive both Vod and actmyname if they accept that what they have done is wrong, they are not going to because they think whatever they are doing is right unless somebody in a position of power says otherwise. unfortunately the people in any position of authority around these forums are busy doing God knows what? then I have no other choice than publicly posting about the wrong doings of people in hopes of getting the attention of community members and letting them know who they are dealing with here.
Here is my argument:
If we could find a way to stop people from abusing other people with DT position they were given temporarily, we'll have a healthy community where people could do their businesses right.
I believe that Vod has misused the trust system by tagging Anduck with red after 2 years, actmyname misused the trust system by tagging Anduck with green without having any past dealings with Anduck, and I also believe that Vod has also misused the trust system by tagging actmyname with green after actmyname countered Vod's feedback on Anduck. however I am willing to forgive both Vod and actmyname if they accept that what they have done is wrong, they are not going to because they think whatever they are doing is right unless somebody in a position of power says otherwise. unfortunately the people in any position of authority around these forums are busy doing God knows what? then I have no other choice than publicly posting about the wrong doings of people in hopes of getting the attention of community members and letting them know who they are dealing with here.
I'm not asking what your opinions are, I've seen enough of that. What have you actually accomplished towards your stated goal? Have you removed any red trust? Have you removed anyone from DT? Do you even have any actual customers who would acknowledge that you're working on their "cases"?
Bump, free service here. I will soon include 2 new cases of power abuse by Vod and actmyname in the second reserved post of this thread.
Cheers.
Cheers.
What's your progress with those cases?
Beside the three tags from you, marlboroza and actmyname, those 2 other cases are completely voluntary and I have received no money for them. thanks for asking.
Here is my argument:
If we could find a way to stop people from abusing other people with DT position they were given temporarily, we'll have a healthy community where people could do their businesses right.
I believe that Vod has misused the trust system by tagging Anduck with red after 2 years, actmyname misused the trust system by tagging Anduck with green without having any past dealings with Anduck, and I also believe that Vod has also misused the trust system by tagging actmyname with green after actmyname countered Vod's feedback on Anduck. however I am willing to forgive both Vod and actmyname if they accept that what they have done is wrong, they are not going to because they think whatever they are doing is right unless somebody in a position of power says otherwise. unfortunately the people in any position of authority around these forums are busy doing God knows what? then I have no other choice than publicly posting about the wrong doings of people in hopes of getting the attention of community members and letting them know who they are dealing with here.
Bump, free service here. I will soon include 2 new cases of power abuse by Vod and actmyname in the second reserved post of this thread.
Cheers.
Cheers.
What's your progress with those cases?
Mutual selection. then if those 3 reputable members lie, people would see and they would lose their reputation if they lie or misjudge.
Three reputable members with green trust have already painted you red. As you can tell from the several threads you have created about this nonsense, the community supports their decisions. By your own criteria, this case is closed.
I'd ask you again to lock these threads, but I know I'd have better luck talking to a brick wall.
Jump to: