Topic: VOTE : Do you want the ETHEREUM DEV. to Fork it --> Save GPU miners ? - page 2. (Read 596 times)
March 20, 2018, 08:21:39 AM
gpu mining ... supported
March 20, 2018, 06:31:40 AM
I am a supporter of mining, GPU. This makes mining a more decentralized system. We all see how the bitcoin community has become dependent on miners. Now bitcoin requires upgrading but this does not happen because there is no consensus between miners and developers. The result is bad for everyone. It seems to me cryptonight is no longer save, but it will be the impetus to destroy the producers of asics and make protection for all the coins that will appear in the future.
March 20, 2018, 06:24:59 AM
Yes
The main reason for cryptos exists is DECENTRALIZATION
If we continue like this, soon only big farms and asics will mine and just a few people will control everything
The main reason for cryptos exists is DECENTRALIZATION
If we continue like this, soon only big farms and asics will mine and just a few people will control everything
March 20, 2018, 06:23:02 AM
POS
March 20, 2018, 06:19:10 AM
absolutely yes. GPU miners is the backbone of decentralize
March 20, 2018, 06:17:25 AM
Although forking it would acquire a vast amount of development. I would all the infrastructure that has been produced and created over the last years would be able able to adapt for it.
Plus they would lose a huge community that mine with GPUs. Would be sad but that is what happened for Bitcoin and look at it now.
Plus they would lose a huge community that mine with GPUs. Would be sad but that is what happened for Bitcoin and look at it now.
March 20, 2018, 04:32:26 AM
I would support a fork of the coin to allow GPU mining to continue. I think it is more in the community spirit for a coin than to have it only mined by a handful of big companies.
It is interesting to go back on the launch threads of so many coins and see how they promoted decentralization and/or ASIC resistance, only for some amount time to pass then they don't seem to care anymore. Is it a case of the Dev's getting rich and really not caring, or are they being offered something in return for not forking? Big money always seems to corrupt things.
It is interesting to go back on the launch threads of so many coins and see how they promoted decentralization and/or ASIC resistance, only for some amount time to pass then they don't seem to care anymore. Is it a case of the Dev's getting rich and really not caring, or are they being offered something in return for not forking? Big money always seems to corrupt things.
March 20, 2018, 04:24:40 AM
Yes. Whatever is the best for the community and the network.
So as I believe yes is the answer.
And to be honest i don't know if it will be next or if it's being already exploited by ASICS. As the difficulty has increased in the last 3 months. Maybe it's a switch because of the profitability, and everyone changed to it. Like I did, i quit monero and started with ethereum. Hope to be back home now with the fork. We'll see 😁😁😁
So as I believe yes is the answer.
And to be honest i don't know if it will be next or if it's being already exploited by ASICS. As the difficulty has increased in the last 3 months. Maybe it's a switch because of the profitability, and everyone changed to it. Like I did, i quit monero and started with ethereum. Hope to be back home now with the fork. We'll see 😁😁😁
March 20, 2018, 04:00:53 AM
VOTE : Do you want the ETH DEV. to Fork it --> Save GPU miners and stop the hidden ASICs ?
After what happen to Monero and to Cryptonight alogorythms, ETH will be the next
THESE ASIC companies they will not stop if they don't get their lesson
YES to ETH FORK
NO to ETH FORK
After what happen to Monero and to Cryptonight alogorythms, ETH will be the next
THESE ASIC companies they will not stop if they don't get their lesson
YES to ETH FORK
NO to ETH FORK
Jump to: