Pages:
Author

Topic: Vote: Fix the BitLicense (Read 2540 times)

legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1004
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
August 16, 2014, 02:34:32 PM
#28
there will be more of this kind of 'regulation' coming .. which is a thinly-veiled attempt to allow coinbase and circle to create a monopoly. Only the big companies can afford to 'play by the rules'
Can you elaborate as to which rules would be costly to abide by?

What the NY regulations say in a nutshell is that companies that exchange BTC to and from fiat must identify people who they trade with (this should already be done due to AML rules), and that exchanges must have enough BTC in their possession to cover all of their customers BTC deposits (in other words they cannot operate on a fractional reserve system).
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
August 15, 2014, 09:34:37 AM
#27
Can anyone summarize what's going on with this bitlicense.  I see references to coinbase (a california company) and some kind of state or local laws, also something about personal information.  Is this having to do with a software license?

Coinbase is pretending the bitlicense regulation has passed already and is voluntarily collecting all of their buyers' information (which is why I stopped buying bitcoin from them).

Put simply, BitLicense would make anybody who deals with bitcoin anywhere in the world have to register their personal information with the state of New York. Bitcoin merchants would have to pay a fee and apply for a license to exchange bitcoin, unless you're a giant megabank already, in which case you are exempt from having to pay the licensing fee.

Interesting.  However, the fact that apparantly it's a New York State law means that it would realy only be enforcable upon businesses located or headquartered in NY.  Right?

Its a proposal not a law, made by an unelected noob politico on the take from lobbyists.
The lobbyist writes the proposal, hands it to the noob politico over lobster on their yacht, and laskys job is to try to make it stick.
He gets out of doing any real thought on the matter, gets the press all riled up and makes a name for himself as the protector of TPTB.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1081
I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.
August 14, 2014, 07:49:57 PM
#26
The regulators will win, they will make money off bitcoin regulation, and the utility of bitcoin will be destroyed.

This is why the price continues to drop despite the millions of dollars of fiat being poured into bitcoin startup ventures.

Please God or somebody else prove me wrong.


The destruction of bitcoin value will be incredible to watch.

*pulls up chair, grins*

 Cheesy


OleOle, I love the omg guys!

Nultidah, well NY can say "anyone in the world has to X" but obviously that's only enforcable on people reachable by the authorities of NY.  If for some reason coinbase or companies in California decide to go along, that's their decision.  I'm not too worried about NY taking over bitcoins, but then again I don't use coinbase anyway.  I can see why it's worth it to leave them because of this decision.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Are you like these guys?
August 14, 2014, 07:03:02 PM
#25
The regulators will win, they will make money off bitcoin regulation, and the utility of bitcoin will be destroyed.

This is why the price continues to drop despite the millions of dollars of fiat being poured into bitcoin startup ventures.

Please God or somebody else prove me wrong.


The destruction of bitcoin value will be incredible to watch.

*pulls up chair, grins*

 Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
August 14, 2014, 06:57:38 PM
#24
Can anyone summarize what's going on with this bitlicense.  I see references to coinbase (a california company) and some kind of state or local laws, also something about personal information.  Is this having to do with a software license?

Coinbase is pretending the bitlicense regulation has passed already and is voluntarily collecting all of their buyers' information (which is why I stopped buying bitcoin from them).

Put simply, BitLicense would make anybody who deals with bitcoin anywhere in the world have to register their personal information with the state of New York. Bitcoin merchants would have to pay a fee and apply for a license to exchange bitcoin, unless you're a giant megabank already, in which case you are exempt from having to pay the licensing fee.

Interesting.  However, the fact that apparantly it's a New York State law means that it would realy only be enforcable upon businesses located or headquartered in NY.  Right?

You would think so, but the way the legislation is currently written they are trying to extend their reach of authority to the entire world, hoping every single bitcoin user across the planet will just willingly go along with it. Even though there exists no legal precedent to do so.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1081
I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.
August 14, 2014, 06:54:13 PM
#23
Can anyone summarize what's going on with this bitlicense.  I see references to coinbase (a california company) and some kind of state or local laws, also something about personal information.  Is this having to do with a software license?

Coinbase is pretending the bitlicense regulation has passed already and is voluntarily collecting all of their buyers' information (which is why I stopped buying bitcoin from them).

Put simply, BitLicense would make anybody who deals with bitcoin anywhere in the world have to register their personal information with the state of New York. Bitcoin merchants would have to pay a fee and apply for a license to exchange bitcoin, unless you're a giant megabank already, in which case you are exempt from having to pay the licensing fee.

Interesting.  However, the fact that apparantly it's a New York State law means that it would realy only be enforcable upon businesses located or headquartered in NY.  Right?
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
August 14, 2014, 06:50:17 PM
#22
Can anyone summarize what's going on with this bitlicense.  I see references to coinbase (a california company) and some kind of state or local laws, also something about personal information.  Is this having to do with a software license?

Coinbase is pretending the bitlicense regulation has passed already and is voluntarily collecting all of their buyers' information (which is why I stopped buying bitcoin from them).

Put simply, BitLicense would make anybody who deals with bitcoin anywhere in the world have to register their personal information with the state of New York. Bitcoin merchants would have to pay a fee and apply for a license to exchange bitcoin, unless you're a giant megabank already, in which case you are exempt from having to pay the licensing fee.
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1081
I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.
August 14, 2014, 06:39:28 PM
#21
Can anyone summarize what's going on with this bitlicense.  I see references to coinbase (a california company) and some kind of state or local laws, also something about personal information.  Is this having to do with a software license?
legendary
Activity: 1153
Merit: 1000
August 14, 2014, 06:33:23 PM
#20
They are already fully-compliant with the legislation, which hasn't even been passed into law yet.

Don't confuse regulation with legislation.

They are only different in HOW the come into being.

They are identical in what they are and the force behind them. It does not matter if it is a regulation or legislative law, if you do not follow either men with guns come and take your possessions, take your children and throw you in jail.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
August 14, 2014, 02:02:48 PM
#19
Is this "fix" like the NYC slang?
Guido da plumber gonna go fix them iffn day don pay.

That may be the only way to "fix" this.  It is broken in so many ways.
hero member
Activity: 586
Merit: 500
August 14, 2014, 06:22:17 AM
#18
I've signed it, whatever little it helps.

Like others have said, NYC can push whatever they like through, just means it'll set the US BTC companies back a little.

newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
August 13, 2014, 04:40:56 PM
#17
does lawsky really care about what bitcoiners think ?  i doubt that   Huh


He might have to, if he doesn't want to exclude the US from the BTC Economy. Talent and innovation will move overseas.

We'll see how it plays out.  Smiley

I don't believe, that this man can to change a position of US in btc economy. But i hope, that he will to do that in small countries.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
August 13, 2014, 04:09:12 PM
#16
They are already fully-compliant with the legislation, which hasn't even been passed into law yet.

Don't confuse regulation with legislation.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
August 13, 2014, 05:10:18 AM
#15

@nutildah

you are wrong. i saved your day  Cheesy

errr did you edit this into your last post?

have you checked the price of BTC lately?

OK markets, I take it back, BTC will still have value independent of the U.S. decision to regulate it! You forgot about foreign markets! Also its harder to get now that Coinbase requires additional user info to purchase.

In time cryptocurrencies of all types will be adopted en masse, filling much-needed moneysaving niches worldwide.

The power of bitcoin's utility to mankind is limited only by the power of our own imaginations!!
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
August 12, 2014, 04:42:52 PM
#14
The regulators will win, they will make money off bitcoin regulation, and the utility of bitcoin will be destroyed.

This is why the price continues to drop despite the millions of dollars of fiat being poured into bitcoin startup ventures.

Please God or somebody else prove me wrong.

legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014
In Satoshi I Trust
August 12, 2014, 04:42:44 PM
#13
some exchanges will comply, some will not. and another interesting part is, to watch the competition between countries when it comes to BTC regulation.

money is more liquid than it was ever before since there is bitcoin.


@nutildah

you are wrong. i saved your day  Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
August 12, 2014, 04:40:10 PM
#12
does lawsky really care about what bitcoiners think ?  i doubt that   Huh


Bingo. And IMO we cryptocoiners should not care about what regulators think. The obvious thing here is that they are starting a fight that's impossible for them to win: what are their intention, to outlaw maths?

We can be sure that the Bitcoin is much stronger and don't really depend on them. If Governments bring abusive regulations on, they will be shooting their own feet, for investors, tax payers, and employment creators will simply avoid that specific state/country/city and will always choose BTC friendly places.

Unless we are too desperate about short term USD/BTC prices we should just let them make their mess... tant pis pour eux
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1001
This is the land of wolves now & you're not a wolf
August 12, 2014, 04:30:28 PM
#11
who cares about some "license" that some people in some small state or city want to push? They are nothing, bitcoin is global

Yeah tell that to Coinbase, one of the biggest bitcoin vendors in the world. They are already fully-compliant with the legislation, which hasn't even been passed into law yet.

I mentioned this before, but my money is on Coinbase being the first Bitcoin company to start issuing 1099s to their users...
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 8114
August 12, 2014, 04:07:29 PM
#10
who cares about some "license" that some people in some small state or city want to push? They are nothing, bitcoin is global

Yeah tell that to Coinbase, one of the biggest bitcoin vendors in the world. They are already fully-compliant with the legislation, which hasn't even been passed into law yet.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1014
August 12, 2014, 03:09:26 PM
#9
who cares about some "license" that some people in some small state or city want to push? They are nothing, bitcoin is global
Pages:
Jump to: