Code:
I vote for: #87 and #92
Topic: [Voting 2024] Bitcoin Pizza Day on Bitcointalk 🍕 - page 10. (Read 5669 times)
We can't vote our own, right?
From the original thread:So, are we voting for our own pizza?
This is allowed, but if I were you I wouldn't do it. 
Code:
I vote for: #42, #92, #101, #15, #100
We can't vote our own, right?
I'll be honest, I completely missed it as well, I had no idea the voting order was important. I see that many users wrote their preferences in a perfect numeric order, I guess they missed this part as well otherwise it would be quite a coincidence.
Bear in mind that not every browser correctly renders that code.
I am currently browsing via my iPhone, and of course I cannot see it, and I am almost sure the same is from Safari on MacOS.
If this piece of information is so crucial, why not report it clearly?
Anyway, as I said, not much damage was done, as there is plenty of time to put everyone on the same page.
EDIT: It works on Safari in Mac OS, but the popup appears after a second or so.
I totally missed the point where icopress said the voting system is based on the IRV.
Using this system is totally fine, yet it should be clear to everyone, and based on an “official” statement by contest organiser(s), rather than speculation.
Hover over "voting" and you will see instant-runoff being mentioned. But yeah, maybe it could have been actually mentioned and not kinda hidden as there might be more like you that missed it. Using this system is totally fine, yet it should be clear to everyone, and based on an “official” statement by contest organiser(s), rather than speculation.
For the voting system to work, any nominated pizza must have the support of at least three users.
Wow ! So much pizzas 
Some are beautifull ! (some less...
)
I vote for: #53, #37, #87
Some are beautifull ! (some less...
)I vote for: #53, #37, #87
I totally missed the point where icopress said the voting system is based on the IRV.
Using this system is totally fine, yet it should be clear to everyone, and based on an “official” statement by contest organiser(s), rather than speculation.
Hover over "voting" and you will see instant-runoff being mentioned. But yeah, maybe it could have been actually mentioned and not kinda hidden as there might be more like you that missed it. Using this system is totally fine, yet it should be clear to everyone, and based on an “official” statement by contest organiser(s), rather than speculation.
For the voting system to work, any nominated pizza must have the support of at least three users.
The fun part is that I even quoted the OP looking for this kind of stuff, but I missed that “hidden” code.
Yes, I think you are right. This should be amended asap and made clear to everyone.
I totally missed the point where icopress said the voting system is based on the IRV.
Using this system is totally fine, yet it should be clear to everyone, and based on an “official” statement by contest organiser(s), rather than speculation.
Hover over "voting" and you will see instant-runoff being mentioned. But yeah, maybe it could have been actually mentioned and not kinda hidden as there might be more like you that missed it. Using this system is totally fine, yet it should be clear to everyone, and based on an “official” statement by contest organiser(s), rather than speculation.
For the voting system to work, any nominated pizza must have the support of at least three users.
Code:
I vote for: #42, #53, #99, #19, #22.
I'm really sorry that I wasn't able to include #97, it required huge effort and was my favorite for a while. #15 was really close as well.
Since we are here, it would be nice to have some tie-braking criteria (what if two pizza end up with the same number of votes? Given the prize structure, avoiding doubts on the ranking system would be nice.
Since Instant-runoff voting system is used, I don't think that its possible to have a tie as the order of votes actually count so the one with highest number of first choices wins. I totally missed the point where icopress said the voting system is based on the IRV.
Using this system is totally fine, yet it should be clear to everyone, and based on an “official” statement by contest organiser(s), rather than speculation.
Since we are here, it would be nice to have some tie-braking criteria (what if two pizza end up with the same number of votes? Given the prize structure, avoiding doubts on the ranking system would be nice.
Since Instant-runoff voting system is used, I don't think that its possible to have a tie as the order of votes actually count so the one with highest number of first choices wins. 
Finally we come to the end, the vote will decide everything. You have created a democratic and fair system, @icopress. Thank you 
I vote for: #42, #22, #17, #19, #53
I vote for: #42, #22, #17, #19, #53
Not in particular order: (...)
FYI: With the vote-counting method that icopress has opted for (IRV), the order of your choices is important.If the order of voting is important, this schould be clearly stated by @icopress. Not much harm doing so before ending of the voting, so that everyone get time to edit accordingly.
Since we are here, it would be nice to have some tie-braking criteria (what if two pizza end up with the same number of votes? Given the prize structure, avoiding doubts on the ranking system would be nice.
I vote for: #2, #22, #45, #111, #88
I vote for: #87, #31, #20, #7, #10
Code:
I vote for: #87, #31, #20, #7, #10
Code:
I vote for: #42, #103, #15, #69, #106,
Code:
I vote for: #42, #103, #106
Code:
I vote for: #100, #15, #42, #76, #18
Not in particular order: (...)
FYI: With the vote-counting method that icopress has opted for (IRV), the order of your choices is important.But to be fair, it's easy to miss that note.
It should've been included in the note next to "five pizzas" rather than "voting" word in the note about nomination.
Jump to: