Pages:
Author

Topic: [VRC] | VeriCoin | POS-NSDI | VeriBit | VeriSend | VeriSMS | SuperNET Core - page 16. (Read 38537 times)

full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Well at least that post was without spelling errors, can't say for the Spanish since I don't speak.  Nice to know you are willing to accept anyone, retard or not.  Good luck with your little chat room.  I'll be back in a couple days for my weekly entertainment, mostly from your lack of spelling but it's your phone though.  Ok.  I understand then. 


Phone made you type that way, not the person behind the phone.  Ok

Has to be those fat fingers I suppose
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
Typing on phone is hard. And I am not in the habit of proofing, usually there's no need. for it...

I thought I made clear that everyone, including cheerleaders and retards, are welcome here. Even you are. But it has nothing to do with me; it's the nature of free speech which the OP obviously supports.

And, as far as I am concerned, "yo soy boricua pa que tu lo sepas" is as welcome as anyone else here... as long as we have things quite clear: He is one of the faces of The Black Hand and therefore every coin he's involved in is, by definition, a scam. Once that out of the way, he can post whatever he wants. Just like everyone else.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Barabbas on right, AltcoinUK on left





full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Come on Hardy, I'm thinking you are the chunky one so I'm calling you Hardy. 
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
For a person who seems to have some sort of intellect, at least you can do a better job at spelling.  Quite pathetic.  Just an observation.  I'm typing this after having two beers at 11.5 percent and still able to spell.  What's up Barabbas??  Fat fingers?? Shocked

Hurting my head trying to read your posts
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
For one, this is the Unofficial Thread and who cares who posts?  Second, why push someone away?  I thought everyone was welcome.   Grin  And please do something about that lack of spell check.  You're killing me.  LOL
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
@amsterdamer

Congrats on finally getting a job. That said it would seem even cheerleaders prefer these forums to "keep the conversation going", rather than your censored, shiny new ones so you are welcome to keep on trollibg at will, just be awsre thst absolutely no one here gives a flying fuck about anyghing you may post. Here or anywhere.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
Quote from: mctaino link=topic=844746.msg9562170#msg95621. C date=1416159455
If this brings some clarification. Someone found a way to manipulatate stake through a patch that vericoin devs made to help the wallets stay in sync. This only affected variable interest coins with the patch. Rat4 brought it to my attention as soon as he found out 2 weeks ago since he reviews our code. He also told vericoin. We both moved quickly to resolve the issue. We at iocoin decided to stick with constant interest and vericon found a fix to stick with variable. But rat4's view were to remove variable or do it right from scratch. Because of the confusion, we decided to go to constant interest to make sure there was 0 chance for another exploit while our team codes DIONS.

I am going to assume the the black hand, throuhh you, is in  control of that shitcoin of yours so thanks for the contribution to yhe subject but I would remain away from this thread ig I werer you.
sr. member
Activity: 334
Merit: 251
Designer and CryptoCurrency Enthusiast.

Thanks for the clarification.
VeriCoin's patched patch solution sounds dangerous. Perhaps that's what EffectsToCause is working on now. I think he's been working on some new code for POS. It's too bad that the developers have abandoned BCT forum users because I'd really love to hear what's going on with this issue.



Everyone can follow the development thread on the official forum@ https://www.vericoinforums.com/threads/development.576/

and by the way heres the A Collection of Useful Threads & Posts @ https://www.vericoinforums.com/threads/a-collection-of-useful-threads-posts-start-here.617/



full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
If this brings some clarification. Someone found a way to manipulatate stake through a patch that vericoin devs made to help the wallets stay in sync. This only affected variable interest coins with the patch. Rat4 brought it to my attention as soon as he found out 2 weeks ago since he reviews our code. He also told vericoin. We both moved quickly to resolve the issue. We at iocoin decided to stick with constant interest and vericon found a fix to stick with variable. But rat4's view were to remove variable or do it right from scratch. Because of the confusion, we decided to go to constant interest to make sure there was 0 chance for another exploit while our team codes DIONS.

Thanks for the clarification.

VeriCoin's patched patch solution sounds dangerous. Perhaps that's what EffectsToCause is working on now. I think he's been working on some new code for POS. It's too bad that the developers have abandoned BCT forum users because I'd really love to hear what's going on with this issue.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 503
If this brings some clarification. Someone found a way to manipulatate stake through a patch that vericoin devs made to help the wallets stay in sync. This only affected variable interest coins with the patch. Rat4 brought it to my attention as soon as he found out 2 weeks ago since he reviews our code. He also told vericoin. We both moved quickly to resolve the issue. We at iocoin decided to stick with constant interest and vericon found a fix to stick with variable. But rat4's view were to remove variable or do it right from scratch. Because of the confusion, we decided to go to constant interest to make sure there was 0 chance for another exploit while our team codes DIONS.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Why are people so hard on this coin? Vericoin is legit, making reviews or helping out other coins, how can this be a bad thing.
If anything, these coins owe them one if they would ever need the help.

Also, many have managed to spin that the developers still holding their coins, months after launch, is a bad thing.

I don't get it?
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100

Also, vericoin started with 26million coins.   Now they have a extra 907k   all from minting, do the math  (i would say since it launched around 300k would be the max from minting, leaving a extra 600k minted from the hack)!  You can clearly see there was a flaw in variable interest that allowed people to mint a 'insane' amount of coins extra per day.


If that's true then this is a theft and PNosker, EffectsToCause are scammers. Lets hear the facts from the developers.

There were over 26,700,000 mined during the POW phase https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6789922

There were no extra coins generated from staking.


Ah OK, that's great, at least that's not an issue and in this case PNosker and EffectsToCause are not in the league of the ICO scammers and other con artists.

Actually, I have to amend my last statement. According to EffectsToCause, there were no more than 500 coins that were generated throught that exploit. They saw IOcoin being exploited heavily and changed the code before VeriCoin could be hit hard.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000

Also, vericoin started with 26million coins.   Now they have a extra 907k   all from minting, do the math  (i would say since it launched around 300k would be the max from minting, leaving a extra 600k minted from the hack)!  You can clearly see there was a flaw in variable interest that allowed people to mint a 'insane' amount of coins extra per day.


If that's true then this is a theft and PNosker, EffectsToCause are scammers. Lets hear the facts from the developers.

There were over 26,700,000 mined during the POW phase https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6789922

There were no extra coins generated from staking.


Ah OK, that's great, at least that's not an issue and in this case PNosker and EffectsToCause are not in the league of the ICO scammers and other con artists.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100

Also, vericoin started with 26million coins.   Now they have a extra 907k   all from minting, do the math  (i would say since it launched around 300k would be the max from minting, leaving a extra 600k minted from the hack)!  You can clearly see there was a flaw in variable interest that allowed people to mint a 'insane' amount of coins extra per day.


If that's true then this is a theft and PNosker, EffectsToCause are scammers. Lets hear the facts from the developers.

There were over 26,700,000 mined during the POW phase https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6789922

There were no extra coins generated from staking.

According to EffectsToCause, no more than 500 coins were generated through this exploit.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000

Also, vericoin started with 26million coins.   Now they have a extra 907k   all from minting, do the math  (i would say since it launched around 300k would be the max from minting, leaving a extra 600k minted from the hack)!  You can clearly see there was a flaw in variable interest that allowed people to mint a 'insane' amount of coins extra per day.


If that's true then this is a theft and PNosker, EffectsToCause are scammers. Lets hear the facts from the developers.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100

Why a new account just to tell me that?

I tried using ESP, but the message didn't go through, so I had to sign up for an account and post the answer. It turns out that when you sign up, you automatically get a new account. Otherwise I would have used an old account.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000

The whole IE fuss is irrelevant imo since it was so long ago and was literally at the birth stage of vrc, I'm sure the devs themselves have learnt a lot since vericoins creation.

Yeah, they have learned and I am sure they would handle many moves very differently, but I have to echo what lazard said about Pnosker.

As I said above the devs are sort of honest guys, what I meant with that "sort of" was exactly same what lazard implies. I certainly don't say Patrick is a scammer or con artist in the sense of real scammers like how BitBay operates, I don't say that Patrick masterminded a scam with VeriCoin, not at all, but only the blind can't see by now that Patrick has a very-very shady side, which was not obvious to people at the beginning when they invested in this coin.

In my opinion the most important issue with Patrick - which issue is on the border line with scam -  that he presented his team as a group of professional developers that is committed to the coin and included in that group Dave - who then since the start is non existent. Patrick sent the following message to investors: we are scientists plus we have a Microsoft developer and we are here for real and for the long term. Any investors would think, if a Microsoft developer put his reputation on the line then it must be a serious venture. Now as we can see the commitment is not real. You can twist it whatever you want, but that was a calculated baby-scammer move, lets present Dave as part of the team, lets gain the trust of the investors with a professional team image that includes a Microsoft developer, and then lets dump our mined shit on the market. That happened, we both know that.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
hero member
Activity: 966
Merit: 500
Pages:
Jump to: