That said, if you are implementing some strategy that allows you to take home small profits while not taking many risks (yes, it is possible), it could formally be claimed that the more you wager the higher your returns are going to be. However, we should keep in mind that you can increase the wagered amount in two ways. The first way is to increase the size of your stakes, while the second to increase the number of your rolls without changing the size of your stakes
Not really. Implementing "some strategy" won't make you rich
But seriously, you may want to learn about the newest and the hottest Martingale-DOGE strategy
It probably won't make you insanely rich, but I never said anything to the contrary anyway. Although it allows you to earn only small profits (the specific term I used), "a win is a win", no matter whether it is big or small, short or long. Regarding casinos banning those strategies, many have effectively already done exactly that, and a long time ago. For the Martingale-DOGE strategy to work properly, you need doges (as the name casually suggests)
and you need your base bet amount to be as small as possible, ideally the lowest possible denomination of the currency. Apart from that, you would also need high betting speeds, the more the merrier. Only a few casinos fully meet these requirements and criteria, with wolf.bet being one them (no advertising or proselytizing intended)
The more you keep on wagering, the higher chance of getting wiped
Rolls are independent of each other, aren't they? It doesn't matter for how long you didn't bust as chances remain absolutely the same. I call it the Gambler's Fallacy in reverse (obviously, you are not the first to come up with this idea, that getting busted gets closer as you roll on)