I honestly prefer chalkboard, if the chalk is good.
You cannot be a rational or logical person and prefer chalk over whiteboard. There's an inherent dirtiness to chalk. The board represents forward evolution in the form of leveraging the mind in order to create tools that allow a mastery over the environment. The chalk is the antithesis of said phenomenon. It embodies the spirit of a wild plains negro rolling around in the dirt. The environment is defeating you instead.
Have you actually used a whiteboard and chalkboard for any significant periods of time? Whiteboards are fucking annoying. Pens always run out. You always get that shitty marker on your hands that is hard to wash off. It feels unpleasant to write on it. You can't as easily correct minor mistakes. Markers always leave residue.
Chalkboards on the other hand feel satisfying to write on. You can quickly erase minor mistake and then just wash your fucking hands with no residue. And when you're cleaning the board all it takes is two swipes with a window wiper to clear and dry the board without residue.
There's just no argument here, and anyone I know who actually has to write anything during lectures agrees. The only ones disagreeing are degenerate social "scientists" who read pleb tier power point presentations.
Are you a degenerate social scientist? Do you advocate for full blown socialism?
I would say from the sociological perspective the only function of a tribe/village/city-state/nation is a grouping of common genetics/ancestry utilizing a decision making process based around the greater good of said group.
In this manner, any type of grouping whether it's humans or animals is always going to technically be socialist in nature to some extent. In terms of humans, any organizational structure not operating under a form of ethnocentric nationalism would be the unsustainable outlier doomed for implosion and reversion back to the norm of ethnocentrism (aka some technicality of socialism).
For instance, this is why the socialist mandate of breaking up of monopolies exists. Or tariffs, another ethnocentric, socialist trait. The modern (Jewish occupied) west is crumbling because it pushes all the negative aspects of socialism while rejecting the only positive ones such as the breaking up of monopolies and tariffs. A real world civilization requires some capitalist and some technically socialist traits to not implode. If you were to not break up any monopolies, things like a Comcast or Amazon monopoly would eventually be your new tyrannical, all-powerful dictator by default.
Humans in the aggregate will enforce ethnocentrism just like they do in prison, but if your new dictator through business monopoly doesn't, you have left the natural order and are once again doomed for implosion. Woops, it looks like those pesky Natzees were onto something.