Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 11295. (Read 26726429 times)

Good morn Bitcoinland.
Thirty-nine-ninety greenbacks
On haiku Sunday.
_____

That's $5325CAD (Bitcoinaverage of course).

Carry on this perverse shit ill have to block you

Why Most Educated People Fail to Understand Bitcoin

Misir Mahmudov, a widely-followed and respected bitcoin (BTC) analyst, has argued that “most educated people fail to appreciate bitcoin because they only specialize in one field.” In order to truly understand how bitcoin works, Mahmudov, a financial economics student at Columbia University, recommends having some grasp of basic computer science and economics concepts.

First proposed in a whitepaper published in November 2008 by its pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, the Bitcoin protocol specifies how an electronic peer-to-peer (P2P) cash system should work. For the first time, modern cryptographic techniques were applied to create what’s now a multi-billion dollar experiment in monetary theory.

https://www.cryptoglobe.com/latest/2019/03/why-most-educated-people-fail-to-understand-bitcoin/

I want to hear about Big Dick Ginger Rick's foreign policy agenda.

the dish ran away with spoon? weee

 I dont even want to imagine 60 regulars responding to 60 regulars on a daily basis.  One could never keep up.

Haha good one .... but there Will always be Some meat that needs to be eaten
Probably not by me though

So, the site was down for 1 min or so and I thought exactly the same just for fun

Enough Sh*t out of my pipehole

Going into HODLnap .....

Good night fellow WO-brothers

 I thought you were off meat Mic? 

Understandable
Though the one ge must go for is HAZARD....——> the worlds MVP imo (especially when he would play in an absolute topteam!)

The way he set up that play was exquisite. He's been in the form of his life recently.

still can't get over his beauty against bayern

Heard Zidane is very interested.

#come on Liverpool 0-1 mane !!

No, I have not described a clock. Clocks don't perform operations.

Context has been given, but you're cherry picking what you want to use to pretend that your reasoning abilities somehow make you superior. They don't. Your reasoning is heavily flawed, much more so than HM's appeal to emotion. He's trying to learn. Toxic and you don't. You're literally equivalent to him (Toxic) and only accepting what you already believe, while running away from arguments you clearly aren't equipped to hold.

Whole point of the finite fields was to demonstrate that objectivity as you seem to understand it is nonsense. No more than a result of evolution simplifying the non-objective reality for the sake of energy conservation.

English describes reality. Extremely poorly.


And again, you've completely ignored the fact that all of Math starts from assumptions. Assumptions which are de facto subjective. You can be "done" and pout all you want, but to use your words, that won't change reality. And if you want to go the "reason" and "objectivity" route, then my experience in Mathematics certainly gives me more authority to speak on this topic than you will ever achieve given my head-start. And the fact remains, Mathematics is a subjective language. Literally a language that is subject to the capacity of human thought. Which is self-evidently limited in scope.

You can't even begin to make an argument with similar rigour to that of a Mathematical proof in English. As such, you have sufficiently demonstrated your complete (current) lack of capacity for understanding the nature of it.

You clearly don't have your emotions in control either, otherwise you would've conceded that your reasoning is insufficient rather than becoming defensive. And here we go full circle to emotion/reasoning being a spectrum that is optimized with equal parts of both. Each to keep the other in check.

Crypto community need to be prepared for something big change in the upcoming days,huge bump hopefully.

What, you wanna see me show my work? No. I'll just address a few points you made and then end it here, there are far better uses of my time right now.

You have described a clock.

Maybe it's useful as a tool for producing some kind of machine or programming or whatever, but without some kind of context to explain what you are trying to do beyond the obvious, the result is still 4.

That produces a lot of energy. That's not "nothing". Also let's see if we can actually produce the stuff outside of theoretical formulas and sci-fi.

Call math a language if you want, doesn't change anything. If it is a language that describes reality then it is reality you are dealing with. And with that I'm done with this topic.

Fat fingers Will come and join the party sooner or later

Example 1000000000 that Honey Badger don’t give a shit. Mother saves her baby from leopard

https://twitter.com/thescarynature/status/1106935834891051008?s=21

^
HONEYBADGER truely doesn’t give a F***

Also, given the etymology and definition of the word:


Math is not just an innovation, but is constantly being re-innovated on a second-to-second basis.

@Mic : Fat fingers are missing

@Pamoldar Thanks bhai=bro