In this particular instance all I see is hypocrisy on your part. You fling ad hominems around without contributing to the discussion whatsoever. The hypocrisy of yours is a direct result of you bold quoting "willful ignorance" while completely ignoring every single thing I've said.
Again, the only problem are people like you. I'm providing objective points of concern from both sides, while you attack people from a perspective that you've picked up in MSM that you clearly don't know shit about. Otherwise you would have a civil discussion instead of attacking me.
You are correct sir..I am calling your character in to question...flat out. If
people like me are the problem then I thank the Lord that
we still seem to have the majority and the World continues on its merry chaotic way. I hear nothing objective from your
opinions other than a sense of bloated self-righteousness bordering on megalomania. Be that at as it may, I believe everyone is entitled to have an opinion and its completely obvious that you have yours and I have mine. Do not think for a second however that I wont call bullsh*t on you when and where appropriate as I have in the past and will continue to do so in the future. That you call my
perspective main stream is laughable and truly shows how little you know and gives insight as to where you think you are. If you want to have a civil conversation fine, but I can not get over the feeling that you have almost zero real world experience in the things you talk about. With nigh 4 decades working out in the field in heavy industry and to have literally watched the sky burn and cry tears of oil I can tell you that from my
perspective, humanity is impacting the planet. Your blasé attempts to provide "points of concern" appear disingenuous and frankly argumentative. Climate change or environmental change, whatever you care to label it is happening and waiting until hypothesis is proven out as fact in this case would be in my humble opinion nothing short of recklessness.
Upon further thought I was not
flinging anything around, this is just plain false. I specifically asked you to pick a direction with a expletive added in for vernacular. If you choose to take this as an ad hominem attack that is your prerogative.
Honestly, it does not matter at this point as I do not feel I will change your mind with my opinions or experiences and we are pretty well off topic so why we dont we leave it with that. Good day.
All you do is attack again and claiming that I'm not being objective. It is you projecting your own evil character into my posts. You are naive. So naive that it distorts your perception of reality. And as a result you're a force of evil.
You haven't even quoted the
literal scientific paper from a peer reviewed scientific journal that I've provided and keep attacking my person. And then you call me non-objective. You
are literally the problem until you stop attacking and start discussing on neutral grounds. You're too deluded and emotional to even realize that
I am not taking any sides you colossal fucking cunt. Your name is clearly a self-descriptor.
Or maybe you're just too fucking old and used up to understand how to look at problems without appealing to authority. You fucking pawn.
P.S. If you were actually objective you would've seen that
I never denied climate change in any of my posts.
I've even provided a fucking paper that shows evidence for climate change you fucking retard. So yes,
you absolutely
are the problem. Your laziness and intellectual dishonesty is the source of all
evil and problems in this world. (By your I'm grouping you with all the morons that act the way you do.)