^
So i say i don’t mind it to be 3.8K
Cause when i have to send Phil.... it sending to an WO active Hodler member
Think you mis understood me there
Maybe my english sometimes excuses ....
Oh... o.k.... no problem...
Without really referring to Phil_S, specifically, I may have also wanted to point out that there are possible tensions, if not contradictions, in the various concepts that you juxtapose, including a member who is active in WO thread may NOT be a hardcore HODLer, like I mentioned in my previous post, there are quite a few members, even good intended ones, who seem to get distracted by valuing fiat and shit coins.
Hey, I don't really have problems with a certain amount of valuing fiat, because fiat does remain both a unit of account, and very widely accepted for a lot of goods and services, and so personally, I think that it is practically too premature to be attempting to hold too much of your value in BTC, while at the same time a good thing to attempt to make sure to HODL at last enough BTC that you are going to be able to decently profit from the seemingly ongoing asymmetric BTC bet (towards the upside in the coming years - even though it could take longer than expected in a longer case negative scenario).
Now, placing value in shitcoins, that seems to be another issue. I am starting to see why some people with very very little accumulated wealth might consider diversifying some of their value into shitcoins, because there are likely a few of the thousands of them that are going to pump beyond the pace of bitcoin, even though it remains a bit of a gamble, I can appreciate why some younger peeps and/or peeps who have accumulated very little wealth might be wiling to gamble a bit higher than me (less than 2%) or a more tolerable higher risk of others (less than 20%) of their value into such seemingly dice-rolling pump-centralization dependent assets.