Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 11500. (Read 26589644 times)

jojo did you mean this (from ages ago lol) ? about Shamir https://btcarmory.com/fragmented-backup-vuln/
found in this great https://medium.com/@lopp/satoshi-roundtable-v-recap-151dab7548bb

I third the request for sauce

thought they'd done away with checkpoints.

Can we just consider it some kind on demented trolling and just move on?

Sideways, Sideways......

Is there evidence that such attempts to build consensus around the topic of reducing the blocksize is contentious?  At this point there is a proposal and maybe some lobbying around the idea.   If it is not likely to happen, then who cares, it is just a discussion point, currently, right?

https://medium.com/@therealsexycyborg/shenzhen-tech-girl-naomi-wu-part-2-over-the-wall-and-into-the-fire-5e8efc5c1509
should maybe try https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZncAvDqB2Q https://librepatron.com/
doubting http://pizarroisp.net/ would take her but idk

He sucks!!!!!!!!!!!!


Woops,  I was intending to be nice to V8...

Or not. I wouldn't call it even a half or 1/4 bart haircut yet   The 3600$ support of Bitfinex is a pain in the ass for the n00bs on bearstamp   The 3700$ resistance is weakened now.

I'm sure that there is more to the gmax description of the bitcoin blocks verification situation than your summary is suggesting, jbreher.





What the guy above me (Hairy) said.

     

https://twitter.com/jratcliff/status/1095108667764953088
The chance of a soft-fork to a lower bitcoin blocksize has effectively a zero chance of reaching consensus. However, the chance that the FUD about it blowing up and generating a bunch of negative press is near a 100%. Can we please just stop this and focus on what is important!

rather good thread emerging

I think that there is more nuance in our various positions.. .so stating that we all agree with your rendition might be a bit too much to ask.   

The weight of the evidence does not support such a conclusion.  I was not trying to change bitcoin.  I was merely going with the flow... BIG blockers were not only trying to change bitcoin, but they were trying to change the whole process about how bitcoin changes were made in order to make changes easier to make in bitcoin.  Sure there may be a few of them that did not have those malicious intentions, but there was an overwhelming propagandizing that still goes on to this day.. both suggesting that bitcoin's governance is broken (using technical arguments as a pretense) and that changes to bitcoin's governance need to be achieved (though such arguments are becoming a bit weaker since they lost pretty decently and decisively last time around).


You are making shit up.  They did not have justifications, and they attempted to force the matter rather than attempting to get consensus and agreement within the bitcoin community.. so instead of working through bitcoin's then BIP processes, they went rogue.. and engaged in various forkenings in order to attempt to blackmail and coerce rather than attempting to improve through cooperation and presenting evidence and arguments.



Yes... we disagree.  There may have been some genuine exceptions, but a lot of the arguments were disingenuous, just like many of the arguments that you presented in this thread.  Of course, you cannot be the spokesperson for the whole of the BIG blockers and all of the nuances, but you did tend to take as many opportunities as you could to attempt to argue their various cases of whining phoney baloney.


That is a distracting argument.. .get the fuck out of here with your lame attempt at censorship proclamations.  The BIG blockers had plenty of venues to argue their cases, including in this forum, and they had plenty of venues to try to persuade folks to move to their BIG block forked, technically inferior pump and dump nonsense.  They have not been successful even with their BIG mouth whiny marketing attempts, and they have not really given up yet (including your desire to keep this topic alive), even though it is becoming more and more convincing, even for dumber money to see that they are just a snake oil scam... I am not going to discount their ability to pump again.. or their willingness to give up in their lame attempts to pump their shit and to continue to deceive sometimes innocent folks in putting money into that crap.

Game over man..support level broken..back to the bear channel we go.

Way to much profit to be made everywhere and anywhere else besides bitcoin atm. Sorry folks..you have to keep suffering. Apparently there are still weak hands that need to be shaken out.

1h



D

Thinking about starting a youtube channel. As I mentioned the other day, the mouse utopia mirrors current world events too much to simply write it off as coincidence. There is so much crazy shit happening every day that could be interpreted in that light, I'd never run out of material.

It appears that the follow through is going in the wrong direction at the moment.  

 Hey, he's a milliner's apprentice so you should cut him some slack. 

It would be nice to see some follow through with this last price jump.

We need to be careful guys.

Arguing against 300kb blocks is playing right into the big blockers hands. 

The real argument is about maintaining stability of the protocol unless there is a really good reason to change it.  And there arent good reasons on either the big or little side. 

FUD unless properly sourced.

It's .3x... hahahahahaha