Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 11549.

CoinCube

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1055

Quote from: bitserve on February 06, 2019, 11:57:31 PM

I think I have "capitulated".

No, I haven't sold. Any. There's no point for me to do that... not at this price, not at any price. But I am slowly losing hope I will see Bitcoin recovering its previous heights. It's more like I have accepted to ride this thing to hell.

Normally I would consider that feeling to be a great contrarian indicator... so bullish. But when I say I am losing hope I really mean it this time. (I) Never before felt like this.

I am struggling to post this or not. But it wouldn't be honest not to share my feeling just to avoid the (probably justified) critic/flame.

I wish to be wrong though. Would even wish for a pump right after I press the "Post" button.

I have never sold a single Bitcoin (trading doesn't count) but now I am starting to understand why some people finally "break".

Still struggling to post..... but will do it, just don't be too hard on me and my current negative view... maybe it is really even a good thing if there's more people feeling the same... or maybe not. Whateva.

* THIS IS NOT FINANCIAL ADVISE, IT'S JUST ME SHARING SOME THOUGHT/FEELING.... MOST PROBABLY COMPLETELY WRONG... HOPE SO.

I don't expect an immenent pump. I suspect Bitcoin is probably going down more. It will be a fantastic buying opportunity.

Nothing has changed in the fundamentals. Bitcoin remains a revolutionary technology that allows ownership of wealth and transfer of value without intermediaries. There is no comparison or real alternative out there for those looking for what it offers. The nations of the world continue to debase their currencies at an unprecedented rate. Socialism is rising everywhere and with it increasing wealth confiscation. That will sooner or later turn ever larger numbers of people to Bitcoin It's just a matter of time.

Bitcoin simply climbed too high too fast on the wild dreams of those who wanted to get rich quick without working and almost all of the forks and altcoins were worthless from the moment of inception and the market is slowly figuring that out. All that is lost for the moment is the get rich quick vibe. The value investor is and will step in at this and lower prices. Bitcoin's long term potential remains quite compelling.

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 07, 2019, 12:29:30 AM

Quote from: realr0ach on February 06, 2019, 11:37:42 PM

Quote from: Toxic2040 on February 06, 2019, 11:07:01 PM

https://i.imgur.com/5lSaw0S.jpg

Anyone else notice Toxic2040's charts are employing so much bogus witchcraft the screen isn't readable at all? Then after going through all this effort, he doesn't even attempt to make an inference as to what the market is doing? It's like his only goal is to create the world's most ugly chart for no reason.

supposed to be a rorschach test, I believe.

"#Stronghands '19"

JayJuanGee

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 11299

Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

Quote from: bitserve on February 06, 2019, 11:57:31 PM

I think I have "capitulated".

No, I haven't sold. Any. There's no point for me to do that... not at this price, not at any price. But I am slowly losing hope I will see Bitcoin recovering its previous heights. It's more like I have accepted to ride this thing to hell.

Normally I would consider that feeling to be a great contrarian indicator... so bullish. But when I say I am losing hope I really mean it this time. (I) Never before felt like this.

I am struggling to post this or not. But it wouldn't be honest not to share my feeling just to avoid the (probably justified) critic/flame.

I wish to be wrong though. Would even wish for a pump right after I press the "Post" button.

I have never sold a single Bitcoin (trading doesn't count) but now I am starting to understand why some people finally "break".

Perhaps you should be taking MajorMax's advice. Go away for 6 months, 1 year or perhaps a little longer depending on how much time you need). Especially, if you are merely HODLing and just getting depressed by watching the flatness that perhaps has decently high odds to lead towards more DOWN.

Quote from: bitserve on February 06, 2019, 11:57:31 PM

Still struggling to post..... but will do it, just don't be too hard on me and my current negative view... maybe it is really even a good thing if there's more people feeling the same... or maybe not. Whateva.

You cannot expect anyone to be nice to you on the interwebs, and could even be the opposite, and maybe that is why going away for a few months or longer could be good.

Quote from: bitserve on February 06, 2019, 11:57:31 PM

* THIS IS NOT FINANCIAL ADVISE, IT'S JUST ME SHARING SOME THOUGHT/FEELING.... MOST PROBABLY COMPLETELY WRONG... HOPE SO.

Who knows? We are in a bearmarket, and that just means that the odds for down are greater than the odds for up, so still hoping for UP is against the odds.. setting yourself up for disappointment, if you are continuing to put actual feelings into hope for UP.. at least currently..

JayJuanGee

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 11299

Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

Quote from: realr0ach on February 06, 2019, 11:37:42 PM

Quote from: Toxic2040 on February 06, 2019, 11:07:01 PM

https://i.imgur.com/5lSaw0S.jpg

Anyone else notice Toxic2040's charts are employing so much bogus witchcraft the screen isn't readable at all? Then after going through all this effort, he doesn't even attempt to make an inference as to what the market is doing? It's like his only goal is to create the world's most ugly chart for no reason.

These markets getting you down, too, Roach?

ToxicChart renditions are supposed to be a rorschach test, I believe.

Toxic2040

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 4197

----------

Quote from: bitserve on February 06, 2019, 11:57:31 PM

~~I think I have "capitulated".~~

No.

~~....MOST PROBABLY COMPLETELY WRONG~~.. HOPE SO.

Stronghands'19

bitserve

legendary

Activity: 1862

Merit: 1530

Self made HODLER ✓

I think I have "capitulated".

No, I haven't sold. Any. There's no point for me to do that... not at this price, not at any price. But I am slowly losing hope I will see Bitcoin recovering its previous heights. It's more like I have accepted to ride this thing to hell.

Normally I would consider that feeling to be a great contrarian indicator... so bullish. But when I say I am losing hope I really mean it this time. (I) Never before felt like this.

I am struggling to post this or not. But it wouldn't be honest not to share my feeling just to avoid the (probably justified) critic/flame.

I wish to be wrong though. Would even wish for a pump right after I press the "Post" button.

I have never sold a single Bitcoin (trading doesn't count) but now I am starting to understand why some people finally "break".

Still struggling to post..... but will do it, just don't be too hard on me and my current negative view... maybe it is really even a good thing if there's more people feeling the same... or maybe not. Whateva.

* THIS IS NOT FINANCIAL ADVISE, IT'S JUST ME SHARING SOME THOUGHT/FEELING.... MOST PROBABLY COMPLETELY WRONG... HOPE SO.

realr0ach

sr. member

Activity: 924

Merit: 311

#TheGoyimKnow

Quote from: Toxic2040 on February 06, 2019, 11:07:01 PM

https://i.imgur.com/5lSaw0S.jpg

Anyone else notice Toxic2040's charts are employing so much bogus witchcraft the screen isn't readable at all? Then after going through all this effort, he doesn't even attempt to make an inference as to what the market is doing? It's like his only goal is to create the world's most ugly chart for no reason.

Toxic2040

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 4197

Good evening all.

Bitcoin continues to trade in a narrow channel and volume remains low. Carry on.

D

#stronghands'19

In other news we celebrate the one year anniversary of the launch of the Falcon Heavy and Starman. The roadster is cruising along just outside the orbit of Mars and can be tracked here.

https://www.whereisroadster.com/

----------

Our resident Artificer has offered an approved upgrade and I graciously have accepted. amazeballz

thank ya homer

Quote from: xhomerx10 on February 07, 2019, 01:15:24 AM

Avatar-sized

Take care
xhomerx10

JayJuanGee

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 11299

Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

Quote from: infofront on February 06, 2019, 10:42:32 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 06, 2019, 10:16:50 PM

Quote from: infofront on February 06, 2019, 09:56:53 PM

Quote from: jbreher on February 06, 2019, 08:11:00 PM

Quote from: Ibian on February 06, 2019, 05:42:10 PM

Quote from: jbreher on February 06, 2019, 11:57:44 AM

Quote from: Ibian on February 05, 2019, 11:58:22 AM

Quote from: infofront on February 05, 2019, 11:42:21 AM

Quote from: Ibian on February 05, 2019, 12:20:44 AM

4 main metrics to look at imo: Ethnicity (white of whatever variety), language (something civilized (english)), culture (NO WELFARE), and taxation on bitcoin.

Looking into it myself, but at the end of the day the only way to know for sure if a given country works is to go there and live for a while.

As a US citizen, my only real options to reduce Bitcoin tax burden would be to ditch my citizenship or move to Puerto Rico. However, as jbreher mentioned, now would be the time to move to PR, while we're in the depths of a bear market.

I'd like to move out of the US, at least temporarily, just for the experience. But I have a baby now, which complicated things further.

Bring your anchor baby with you. That's what the anchor fucking means.

What? Babies go where the parents go.

Yes. But at least 'round these parts, the term anchor baby refers to a kid born to an illegal alien upon US soil. Such an event entitles the baby to automatic US Citizenship status. This provides a tie for the rest of the family to argue for US legal resident status. Thereby, 'anchor'.

Such a term is clearly inapplicable to infofront's current situation with an already-born child. Nevermind the fact that it seems likely infofront is already US-ian.

This.

I doubt that Ibian is unaware of the USA political usage of the term "anchor baby," and likely, he purposefully used the term in different way, perhaps in order to cause some definitional distress from various readers, as a kind of joke. And, maybe the joke has become a bit more funny because of jbreher's perception of a necessity to explain the current USA political usage of the term "anchor baby?"

Jokes are not so good when explained, but as you may recall, infofront had already said that he could not travel as easily, in part, because of baby, which could imply that said baby is anchoring down infofront's mobility.

Literal rather than political definition of an "anchor baby."

I better not attempt to explain more because the joke is going to become even less funny, perhaps? Cry

It might've been a joke that was lost on me (and jbreher it seems). I know Ibian is European, so I figured he was just misunderstanding the term.

Ibian seems to be pretty up-to-date on various USA politics, especially the right winged stuff. He should be able to easily clarify what he meant. It is not out of the question that I could have read his post wrong?

JayJuanGee

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 11299

Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

Quote from: realr0ach on February 06, 2019, 10:40:25 PM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 06, 2019, 10:19:54 PM

Quote from: realr0ach on February 06, 2019, 10:08:24 PM

Quote from: infofront on February 06, 2019, 11:37:16 AM

Quote from: infofront on February 06, 2019, 10:14:35 AM

Bearish Murad Tweetstorm

He's a fairly well known guy in the bitcoin twittersphere. I think he's basically a bitcoin maximalist. He's just been a little overbearing in his pain forecasts.

What about if the r0ach hypothesis of the market is accurate, then is it bearish? That a single entity on Bitfinex has controlled the price all the way from $200 to $20,000 and I'm leaning towards the identity of that entity being Bitmain. If the identity of this entity was Bitmain and Bitmain implodes, bankrupts, or has no money to pump it anymore, then how is bitcoin going to be artificially manipulated to a bazillion dollars each with no Bitmain to rig it there?

Stop trying to claim credit for a theory that is shared by a lot of other reddit nutjobs. The bitfinex manipulation theory. Can read a thousand versions of such theory on reddit with such minor variations that they all boil down to nearly the same thing, which, in essence, is pie in the sky making up shit. Roll Eyes

JayJuanGee, are you retarded? I am the originator of this theory. People like that guy named "Bitfinexed" came WAY after me. It's even posted on a damn blockchain. Do you see the date? It says "3 years ago". That's how you can tell I was correct, because so many people came after me all with similar conclusions:

https://steemit.com/news/@r0achtheunsavory/bitfinex-is-lying-about-the-hack-and-i-can-tell-you-exactly-what-likely-happened

And a followup post to that one where you can see the insanely scammy bid and sell sides on Bitfinex after it came back up from the supposed "hack". You can EASILY tell the price there is controlled by a single entity in the screenshot on this post and that entity likely has connections to the people running the exchange because nobody else would store money there after their fake hack:

https://steemit.com/money/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-vol-3-bitfinex-scamming-intensifies-and-more-on-the-silver-and-gold-markets

Perhaps you were the leader of the loonies? the seminal loon, so to speak? I doubt it, but perhaps? If so, congratulations would be in order for you, insightful sir. Wink

Hueristic

legendary

Activity: 3836

Merit: 4969

Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it

Quote from: Globb0 on February 06, 2019, 06:26:12 AM

Quote from: HairyMaclairy on February 06, 2019, 06:09:19 AM

Top merit horses of all time

Edit: I missed xhomerx also on that list !

Need to subtract the airdrops to see the true picture of merit leaders

IMHO

Not really, I and i'm sure others give less to peops that are already Legendary.

Edit: shit its already subtracted, can't keep up with this thread.

infofront

legendary

Activity: 2660

Merit: 2868

Shitcoin Minimalist

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 06, 2019, 10:16:50 PM

Quote from: infofront on February 06, 2019, 09:56:53 PM

Quote from: jbreher on February 06, 2019, 08:11:00 PM

Quote from: Ibian on February 06, 2019, 05:42:10 PM

Quote from: jbreher on February 06, 2019, 11:57:44 AM

Quote from: Ibian on February 05, 2019, 11:58:22 AM

Quote from: infofront on February 05, 2019, 11:42:21 AM

Quote from: Ibian on February 05, 2019, 12:20:44 AM

4 main metrics to look at imo: Ethnicity (white of whatever variety), language (something civilized (english)), culture (NO WELFARE), and taxation on bitcoin.

Looking into it myself, but at the end of the day the only way to know for sure if a given country works is to go there and live for a while.

As a US citizen, my only real options to reduce Bitcoin tax burden would be to ditch my citizenship or move to Puerto Rico. However, as jbreher mentioned, now would be the time to move to PR, while we're in the depths of a bear market.

I'd like to move out of the US, at least temporarily, just for the experience. But I have a baby now, which complicated things further.

Bring your anchor baby with you. That's what the anchor fucking means.

What? Babies go where the parents go.

Yes. But at least 'round these parts, the term anchor baby refers to a kid born to an illegal alien upon US soil. Such an event entitles the baby to automatic US Citizenship status. This provides a tie for the rest of the family to argue for US legal resident status. Thereby, 'anchor'.

Such a term is clearly inapplicable to infofront's current situation with an already-born child. Nevermind the fact that it seems likely infofront is already US-ian.

This.

I doubt that Ibian is unaware of the USA political usage of the term "anchor baby," and likely, he purposefully used the term in different way, perhaps in order to cause some definitional distress from various readers, as a kind of joke. And, maybe the joke has become a bit more funny because of jbreher's perception of a necessity to explain the current USA political usage of the term "anchor baby?"

Jokes are not so good when explained, but as you may recall, infofront had already said that he could not travel as easily, in part, because of baby, which could imply that said baby is anchoring down infofront's mobility.

Literal rather than political definition of an "anchor baby."

I better not attempt to explain more because the joke is going to become even less funny, perhaps? Cry

It might've been a joke that was lost on me (and jbreher it seems). I know Ibian is European, so I figured he was just misunderstanding the term.

realr0ach

sr. member

Activity: 924

Merit: 311

#TheGoyimKnow

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 06, 2019, 10:19:54 PM

Quote from: realr0ach on February 06, 2019, 10:08:24 PM

Quote from: infofront on February 06, 2019, 11:37:16 AM

Quote from: infofront on February 06, 2019, 10:14:35 AM

Bearish Murad Tweetstorm

He's a fairly well known guy in the bitcoin twittersphere. I think he's basically a bitcoin maximalist. He's just been a little overbearing in his pain forecasts.

What about if the r0ach hypothesis of the market is accurate, then is it bearish? That a single entity on Bitfinex has controlled the price all the way from $200 to $20,000 and I'm leaning towards the identity of that entity being Bitmain. If the identity of this entity was Bitmain and Bitmain implodes, bankrupts, or has no money to pump it anymore, then how is bitcoin going to be artificially manipulated to a bazillion dollars each with no Bitmain to rig it there?

Stop trying to claim credit for a theory that is shared by a lot of other reddit nutjobs. The bitfinex manipulation theory. Can read a thousand versions of such theory on reddit with such minor variations that they all boil down to nearly the same thing, which, in essence, is pie in the sky making up shit. Roll Eyes

JayJuanGee, are you retarded? I am the originator of this theory. People like that guy named "Bitfinexed" came WAY after me. It's even posted on a damn blockchain. Do you see the date? It says "3 years ago". That's how you can tell I was correct, because so many people came after me all with similar conclusions:

https://steemit.com/news/@r0achtheunsavory/bitfinex-is-lying-about-the-hack-and-i-can-tell-you-exactly-what-likely-happened

And a followup post to that one where you can see the insanely scammy bid and sell sides on Bitfinex after it came back up from the supposed "hack". You can EASILY tell the price there is controlled by a single entity in the screenshot on this post and that entity likely has connections to the people running the exchange because nobody else would store money there after their fake hack:

https://steemit.com/money/@r0achtheunsavory/the-r0ach-report-vol-3-bitfinex-scamming-intensifies-and-more-on-the-silver-and-gold-markets

infofront

legendary

Activity: 2660

Merit: 2868

Shitcoin Minimalist

Quote from: realr0ach on February 06, 2019, 10:08:24 PM

Quote from: infofront on February 06, 2019, 11:37:16 AM

Quote from: infofront on February 06, 2019, 10:14:35 AM

Bearish Murad Tweetstorm

He's a fairly well known guy in the bitcoin twittersphere. I think he's basically a bitcoin maximalist. He's just been a little overbearing in his pain forecasts.

What about if the r0ach hypothesis of the market is accurate, then is it bearish?

That would be bullish in the medium term.

Quote

That a single entity on Bitfinex has controlled the price all the way from $200 to $20,000 and I'm leaning towards the identity of that entity being Bitmain. If the identity of this entity was Bitmain and Bitmain implodes, bankrupts, or has no money to pump it anymore, then how is bitcoin going to be artificially manipulated to a bazillion dollars each with no Bitmain to rig it there?

Bitfinex has some influence on the market insofar as their Tether printing goes. They can manage that without Bitmain or anyone else, except maybe some crooked accountants.
You're always on about bitfinex controlling the market. They rank #44 in 24 hour volume on coinmarketcap. What am I missing?

Hueristic

legendary

Activity: 3836

Merit: 4969

Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it

Quote from: wachtwoord on February 06, 2019, 02:58:14 AM

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 06, 2019, 02:32:29 AM

Quote from: Ibian on February 06, 2019, 02:27:10 AM

Wait, twitter jack jack? Hm. Maybe some of his questionable actions are just a result of being in a tough position.

Why? Jack is a bitcoin maximalist, and considers other coins to be shit/scams. He is the owner of twitter, but also Square. So many of the references that he is making is regarding square, rather than twitter, even though there may be some overlap in the future, too.

In other words, his bitcoin maximalist stance seems to be following a similar ideology as the vast plurality of active participants of this thread. No? What's strange about that?

Supporting Bitcoin is not questionable at all of course.

Twitter's banning of accounts not repeating the left-wing kumbaya propaganda is. Ibian implies that Jack's hand may be tied on that one.

JayJuanGee

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 11299

Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

Quote from: realr0ach on February 06, 2019, 10:08:24 PM

Quote from: infofront on February 06, 2019, 11:37:16 AM

Quote from: infofront on February 06, 2019, 10:14:35 AM

Bearish Murad Tweetstorm

He's a fairly well known guy in the bitcoin twittersphere. I think he's basically a bitcoin maximalist. He's just been a little overbearing in his pain forecasts.

What about if the r0ach hypothesis of the market is accurate, then is it bearish? That a single entity on Bitfinex has controlled the price all the way from $200 to $20,000 and I'm leaning towards the identity of that entity being Bitmain. If the identity of this entity was Bitmain and Bitmain implodes, bankrupts, or has no money to pump it anymore, then how is bitcoin going to be artificially manipulated to a bazillion dollars each with no Bitmain to rig it there?

Stop trying to claim credit for a theory that is shared by a lot of other reddit nutjobs. The bitfinex manipulation theory. Can read a thousand versions of such theory on reddit with such minor variations that they all boil down to nearly the same thing, which, in essence, is pie in the sky making up shit. Roll Eyes

JayJuanGee

legendary

Activity: 3920

Merit: 11299

Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

Quote from: infofront on February 06, 2019, 09:56:53 PM

Quote from: jbreher on February 06, 2019, 08:11:00 PM

Quote from: Ibian on February 06, 2019, 05:42:10 PM

Quote from: jbreher on February 06, 2019, 11:57:44 AM

Quote from: Ibian on February 05, 2019, 11:58:22 AM

Quote from: infofront on February 05, 2019, 11:42:21 AM

Quote from: Ibian on February 05, 2019, 12:20:44 AM

4 main metrics to look at imo: Ethnicity (white of whatever variety), language (something civilized (english)), culture (NO WELFARE), and taxation on bitcoin.

Looking into it myself, but at the end of the day the only way to know for sure if a given country works is to go there and live for a while.

As a US citizen, my only real options to reduce Bitcoin tax burden would be to ditch my citizenship or move to Puerto Rico. However, as jbreher mentioned, now would be the time to move to PR, while we're in the depths of a bear market.

I'd like to move out of the US, at least temporarily, just for the experience. But I have a baby now, which complicated things further.

Bring your anchor baby with you. That's what the anchor fucking means.

What? Babies go where the parents go.

Yes. But at least 'round these parts, the term anchor baby refers to a kid born to an illegal alien upon US soil. Such an event entitles the baby to automatic US Citizenship status. This provides a tie for the rest of the family to argue for US legal resident status. Thereby, 'anchor'.

Such a term is clearly inapplicable to infofront's current situation with an already-born child. Nevermind the fact that it seems likely infofront is already US-ian.

This.

I doubt that Ibian is unaware of the USA political usage of the term "anchor baby," and likely, he purposefully used the term in different way, perhaps in order to cause some definitional distress from various readers, as a kind of joke. And, maybe the joke has become a bit more funny because of jbreher's perception of a necessity to explain the current USA political usage of the term "anchor baby?"

Jokes are not so good when explained, but as you may recall, infofront had already said that he could not travel as easily, in part, because of baby, which could imply that said baby is anchoring down infofront's mobility.

Literal rather than political definition of an "anchor baby."

I better not attempt to explain more because the joke is going to become even less funny, perhaps? Cry

Hueristic

legendary

Activity: 3836

Merit: 4969

Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on February 05, 2019, 04:30:56 PM

(How'd I do?? I've been working on my JJG impersonation)

Not bad. Now that I think about it, I recall the chronology of the events being something like;

1) Me making snarky response to JJG being "wordy-man" with his posting style
2) JJG doesn't take it too well and makes some veiled and limp-wristed homophobic rebuttal
3) I don't take kindly to those types of ignorant folk
4) Ignored
5) Wanted to punch the guy in the fucking face ever since

Well thats just Gay. Tongue

Quote from: JayJuanGee on February 05, 2019, 07:52:38 PM

There is no hate on my end. Bob just possesses a lack of tolerance to anyone who won't suck his tiny penis that he wants peeps to believe is bery bery bery BIG. Cheesy

Wait, this is even gayer.

realr0ach

sr. member

Activity: 924

Merit: 311

#TheGoyimKnow

Quote from: infofront on February 06, 2019, 11:37:16 AM

Quote from: infofront on February 06, 2019, 10:14:35 AM

Bearish Murad Tweetstorm

He's a fairly well known guy in the bitcoin twittersphere. I think he's basically a bitcoin maximalist. He's just been a little overbearing in his pain forecasts.

What about if the r0ach hypothesis of the market is accurate, then is it bearish? That a single entity on Bitfinex has controlled the price all the way from $200 to $20,000 and I'm leaning towards the identity of that entity being Bitmain. If the identity of this entity was Bitmain and Bitmain implodes, bankrupts, or has no money to pump it anymore, then how is bitcoin going to be artificially manipulated to a bazillion dollars each with no Bitmain to rig it there?

infofront

legendary

Activity: 2660

Merit: 2868

Shitcoin Minimalist

Quote from: jbreher on February 06, 2019, 08:11:00 PM

Quote from: Ibian on February 06, 2019, 05:42:10 PM

Quote from: jbreher on February 06, 2019, 11:57:44 AM

Quote from: Ibian on February 05, 2019, 11:58:22 AM

Quote from: infofront on February 05, 2019, 11:42:21 AM

Quote from: Ibian on February 05, 2019, 12:20:44 AM

4 main metrics to look at imo: Ethnicity (white of whatever variety), language (something civilized (english)), culture (NO WELFARE), and taxation on bitcoin.

Looking into it myself, but at the end of the day the only way to know for sure if a given country works is to go there and live for a while.

As a US citizen, my only real options to reduce Bitcoin tax burden would be to ditch my citizenship or move to Puerto Rico. However, as jbreher mentioned, now would be the time to move to PR, while we're in the depths of a bear market.

I'd like to move out of the US, at least temporarily, just for the experience. But I have a baby now, which complicated things further.

Bring your anchor baby with you. That's what the anchor fucking means.

What? Babies go where the parents go.

Yes. But at least 'round these parts, the term anchor baby refers to a kid born to an illegal alien upon US soil. Such an event entitles the baby to automatic US Citizenship status. This provides a tie for the rest of the family to argue for US legal resident status. Thereby, 'anchor'.

Such a term is clearly inapplicable to infofront's current situation with an already-born child. Nevermind the fact that it seems likely infofront is already US-ian.

This.

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 11549. (Read 26586222 times)