Name me one example in which you will see strictly better results by complaining than by thinking up different potential solutions. You can't. Because complaining is a destructive force with a net effect that is either zero or negative.
What you call "complaining" I call advocacy. And advocacy works. We wouldn't have the UK modern slavery laws without advocacy.
Making it illegal for Western companies to profit from slavery is highly effective, because the directors go directly to jail. And guess what, company directors sit up in their chairs and pay attention when you say "if you don't do X, you will go to jail". Then the directors tell their C-suite, "don't fuck up on X, or I will fire you without hesitation". Those are real results, in real time.
That is one you will see strictly better results by "complaining" rather than blaming the victim. Because what you are doing is blaming the slave for being a slave. And that achieves nothing.
This just shows that your reading comprehension skills are non-existent. You're filling gaps that never even existed.
The quote of mine stated that:
An individual which chooses to invest
their individual time into complaining about
their individual situation instead of trying to improve their
own individual situation doesn't deserve an improved situation. (Spoilers: Always the same individual.)
You now take an outsider, e.g. yourself, complaining on behalf of a victim (which you made up) to disprove my assertion.
None of what you've tried to state here has anything to do with what I've stated.
In my statement, the slave girl or child soldier or whatever the fuck you want to use as an appeal-to-emotion example (any individual can be used here, really) is better off investing their time into figuring out any way to improve their situation over complaining over their situation.
Complaining will do nothing to improve their situation, especially in the outlandish situations you've named here.
Yet you try to use those to disprove a completely different claim
that you have made up (and constantly keep changing with new examples). All while trying to portray me as some kind of inhumane devil. That's some serious mental acrobatics that I would only expect out of a lawyer.