Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 11968. (Read 26710898 times)

legendary
Activity: 3620
Merit: 4813
https://twitter.com/eth_classic

https://twitter.com/etherchain_org/status/1082329360948969472

ETC is likely to have undergone a 51% attack.

I'm accepting donations to Barry Silbert via my usual address.

Well, that escalated quickly Smiley

legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
i just cant help but thinking some fundamental flaw will be found in the bluetooth chip as i thought i had read about some bluetooth chips having vulnerabilities before.

Yeah, that's what squicks me.

OTOH, Ledger has some of the principals from Gemalto, who in turn are like the gold standard in enterprise mobile security.

Time will tell. No need to replace my current vault. I'll see if it stands the test of time.
jr. member
Activity: 527
Merit: 6
You promised us you could think, but you show no evidence for that.
Evidence come after thinking : if Bitcoin was created to avoid gov's control, how stupid gov are to accept and approve Bitcoin

Gov always looking for new assets to tax.

How can gov tax a Bitcoin address that belongs to a wallet installed on an unkown PC where Bitcoin has been transfered to that address by coinjoin.
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 4597
assholes can try the same on btc?

They'd have to have a mountain more money.
 

not money, hashing power.
money (tokens) in POS blockchains, hashing power in POW (btc).
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
You promised us you could think, but you show no evidence for that.
Evidence come after thinking : if Bitcoin was created to avoid gov's control, how stupid gov are to accept and approve Bitcoin

Gov always looking for new assets to tax.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 3056
Welt Am Draht
assholes can try the same on btc?

They'd have to have a mountain more money.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/ethereum-classic-51-attack-would-cost-just-55-mln-result-in-1-bln-profit-research and I'll bet that figure is way lower now.

And ETC can die or be rogered to pieces without too many other people caring. If you did the same to BTC there wouldn't be anything left to short.

The Bcashes are much more likely candidates but the only people spiteful enough to do it are the ones keeping the Bcashes alive.
legendary
Activity: 938
Merit: 2540
<>
Median Bitcoin (BTC) Transaction Fees Are At Lowest Level in Over Three Years

It is true > "The Bitcoin network, is handling 75% more transactions than 2015 with same median fees. It's not perfect, it's progress."



https://www.cryptoglobe.com/latest/2019/01/median-bitcoin-btc-transaction-fees-are-at-lowest-level-since-three-years/
legendary
Activity: 3990
Merit: 4597
https://twitter.com/eth_classic

https://twitter.com/etherchain_org/status/1082329360948969472

ETC is likely to have undergone a 51% attack.

I'm accepting donations to Barry Silbert via my usual address.

assholes can try the same on btc?
maybe, but much less likely.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
You promised us you could think, but you show no evidence for that.

edit: the 'you' refers to some troll, since deleted
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
I knew I shouldn't've lent that shady-looking guy my abacus.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 3056
Welt Am Draht
https://twitter.com/eth_classic

https://twitter.com/etherchain_org/status/1082329360948969472

ETC is likely to have undergone a 51% attack.

I'm accepting donations to Barry Silbert via my usual address.
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 13618
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it
OK, you win if you can get one Core Dev to agree with your assertion that a second layer solution is as secure as a first layer solution.

Ok if you are going to debate with me, you need to stop putting words in my mouth or twisting what I type. I never fucking said this, anywhere. I said that Bitcoin can still become the dominate crypto and service the whole world without a first layer privacy solution.

Go back and reread our exchange I made that exact reply as to why edge cases are not covered in which you attacked my post and now you say you never said that. Well arguing that I was wrong when I said that is the same as saying it is not true.


OK, I have grabbed the post and added it here.

For instance privacy as a second layer will never compete with a first layer solution period, go ahead and ask any expert you want.
Clarify/quantify 'never compete'? Bitcoin is competing the hell out of all the other shitcoins, and winning like a boss. Its utility, security, and universal adoption is miles ahead of anything else.

The vast majority of Bitcoin users feel the privacy issue is a non-argument. All of your online devices are insecure, your data you freely give over to OS creators and Social Media platform providers, where it is then sold, or hacked, or both. Your IoT devices are listening to your every conversation. How about we fix those privacy problems first, eh?

Crypto doesn't care what you FEEL, it doesn't change facts.

Bitcoin can be the dominant crypto in the entire world and handle the world at large without a first layer privacy solution. FACT. How does that bit of news FEEL to you?

Maybe we disagree on what the highlighted means as I believe it is a fact that nothing can "dominant crypto in the entire world" without providing all the services that the world needs, one of which is privacy.
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it

Non-story, as Tim Sweeny admitted himself.

It was one of their payment processors "trying something out".
It's a great story.
Monero afficionados had five days in the sun.
Then reality hit them in the face like a bottle of Barolo

Haha, good one. I was at casino being a donkey and missed it mostly, too bad would be funny that a childs game would give a shit about privacy.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1530
Self made HODLER ✓
JFC, whats up with the tens of merits being thrown here and there? Have everybody got a merit supply injection from Theymos or what?


hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 13618
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
^








small appropriate joke

Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 13618
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
No it isn't. Just because 99.9999999999999% of people right now don't own Bitcoin, doesn't mean it can't "handle the world at large".

You can't prove that it can.,
And you can't prove that it can't

Bitcoin can be the dominant crypto in the entire world and handle the world at large without a first layer privacy solution. FACT. How does that bit of news FEEL to you?

Prove this assertion, you cannot.

And you can't prove that it can't.

So impasse? Nanner nanner?

OK, you win if you can get one Core Dev to agree with your assertion that a second layer solution is as secure as a first layer solution.

Done go get that quote. And I'll give you 25 merit.

AFA what BTC can handle, there would not be a need for the work being done on lightning right now if it could handle those people already. Duh that is why lightning is being developed, or did you think it was already done?
[/quote]



hero member
Activity: 1358
Merit: 834
https://cointelegraph.com/news/nasdaq-powered-exchange-to-launch-eu-regulated-tokenized-stock-trading

Probably old, but I've fallen too far behind over the holidays to check.

Step one towards crypto equity looks about done. Which should drive demand for Bitcoin as trading stock against BTC becomes a possibility that will increase liquidity. Hopefully not too late for capital flight out of stocks into corn in what seems like an upcoming recession.


After this it seems like a matter of time until stock and crypto become equivalent.
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 13618
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
wodka and drinking
saturdayz, wasted alwayz
sober up seems far


just for trying
Jump to: