Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 12227. (Read 26607656 times)

legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1126
It's all mathematics...!
I think ppl on here are losing grip on reality...
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 22
i am reading this a few days per week, lately every 1 or 2 days if i have time
and, i cant stand it anymore, so i am gonna pop the question
whats up with the hats?
circle jerk.

You stupid, myopic bastard.

A few years from now, these hats will be critical for verifying the identify of people worth more money than you can possibly imagine.
for taxes or extortions?
member
Activity: 258
Merit: 14
But look how thin on the sell side of the real orderbooks are on exchanges.   Took less than 2k BTC to push the price up >500 Dollars on Finex.   So, all this dumping is pure price suppression.     Looking there is less than 1k BTC to buy up to over 4k dollars.  No one is really selling at this price just the exchange bots on a rampage.
copper member
Activity: 53
Merit: 0


i think  this article is made by account Peter Mallouk on forbes and this account i think made only 1 post on forbes

nobody think...  the future is the future..
member
Activity: 136
Merit: 17


i think  this article is made by account Peter Mallouk on forbes and this account i think made only 1 post on forbes
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 11299
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
What this thread needs more than anything is its very own baby.

I thought we had infofront's?

We used to have bitcoinchick and bitcoinchick's husband, but husband cashed out the bitcoins when the price went down from $600 to $200, and even though they might have bought some back, they have not really been active in the thread, so any babies seem to be "off thread" and perhaps even only marginally bitcoin induced.   Shocked
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3015
Welt Am Draht
I thought we had infofront's?

First I've heard of it. He must be holding it back.

In that case we're all going to have to send some sperm to a PO box, purchase a nice third world lady, get her to do the turkey baster thing and we'll raise the child on here. The sperm will be mixed up rather like a firing squad so we're all the father and not.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 13505
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
What this thread needs more than anything is its very own baby.

I thought we had infofront's?

Is future long term plan..... POW, perfect scalling, limited etc
legendary
Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511
What this thread needs more than anything is its very own baby.

I thought we had infofront's?
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
Ouch, that 15 minute candle must have schooled some bottom shorters. Bears getting rekt in a bear market; it just isn't right.  Cry
legendary
Activity: 3836
Merit: 4969
Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it

Does the seller side has to have the bitcoins when the contract is made?

No. That's the whole idea behind "regulated" bitcoin markets. You don't need to have a single satoshi to sell thousands of bitcoins and suppress price.

Bankers think that bitcoin ETFs will solve bitcoin supply "problem".


When the contract expires seller has to anyway have to get the coins from somewhere to be able to sell them to the buyer?

Nope. Actual delivery of bitcoins is forbidden. Just like in gold futures and ETFs. At the expiry date profit/loss is cleared through the seller's margin deposit which is in dollars. If the seller is systemically important bank and they did the wrong bet Fed will print new dollars and will give them to pay for their loss.


The buyer side was there to buy some bitcoins. If he will not have them, what will he have? The dollars?

The contract said for example buyer will buy three bitcoins for price 3500$ per one coin which is total 10500$. But the day price is 4500$ per bitcoin which is total 13500$. So the buyer will have 3000$ for bank account?

Yes, buyer will have $3000 credited to their margin deposit/bank account.

Regulated bitcoin markets are not for trading bitcoins but for bets on the future bitcoin price. Profit/loss resulting from those bets is paid in dollars. So, if you have unlimited access to the dollar printing press you can sell 21 million bitcoins without having a single satoshi.



https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.27951782



legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1191
Privacy Servers. Since 2009.
Pompenna pomp... pomp eeet  Cool
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
My Christmas wishes re bitcoin in 2019:

1. No ETF. Why? Because institutions are losers who don't give a s-t about bitcoin as an idea. Same for retirees. Watch them scramble to alternative assets once their asses would be on the line due to the downturn.

2. No bakkt. Why? Because bakkt will manifest custodial holding, hopothecation, rehypothetication, same as gold. Garbage! We don't need it. We do not need custodial solution when blockchain is the most secure custodian EVER.

3. No bitmain. I hope that they piss off and/or go bankrupt.

4. Yes 10X, maybe even 100X growth of Lightning.

5. Yes to more people participating in bitcoin.

6. Yes to more self-organization of the bitcoin crowd. We need it to survive potential fiat calamities. Do I want gold? Nope.

I agree with everything but LN. Sorry, but keeping my funds in a hot wallet is not the best security.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 13505
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
Let's knock at the $3500 door... If no one opens, let's smash it!


Weeeeeeeeeeeeeee = pump
legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1520
Let's knock at the $3500 door... If no one opens, let's smash it!

legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 2846
Holy F.. lift off

It's just part of the Bart pattern. We are back to where we were 24 hours ago.
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 4331
My Christmas wishes re bitcoin in 2019:

1. No ETF. Why? Because institutions are losers who don't care in the slightest about bitcoin as an idea. Same for retirees. Watch them scramble to alternative assets once their asses would be on the line due to the downturn.

2. No bakkt. Why? Because bakkt will manifest custodial holding, hypothecation, rehypothetication, same as gold. Garbage! We don't need it. We do not need custodial solution when blockchain is the most secure custodian EVER.

3. No bitmain. I hope that they piss off and/or go bankrupt.

4. Yes 10X, maybe even 100X growth of Lightning.

5. Yes to more people participating in bitcoin.

6. Yes to more self-organization of the bitcoin crowd. We need it to survive potential fiat calamities. Do I want gold? Nope.
legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 2846
So we going to start swapping recipes bitches?

Are we going to have a WO cook-off? Because I will own you bitches.
If I cooked something I'd break my OpSec. I'm Gordon fucking Ramsay.

That name's already taken here.

legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
To anyone who opened up a 50x or 100x short on Bitmex in the last hour, my condolences.  Cry
legendary
Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245
Jump to: