Data/information is only as good as its source. Highest level being 15, not bullish. Edit: Bitcoin Cash has a "16".
Bitcoin SV? 100.
#justsayin'
Actually only 86 currently...was 100 2 weeks ago.
No. The term is not bitcoin+cash+sv, it is bitcoin+sv. And it is trending currently at 100.
Even if it were 86, you are still making my point for me.
In this thread, we already know that part of the motivation of the bcash forks has been to attempting to put bitcoin back into their name(s),
Back? Sorry, dude or dudette - it was always there. Note the term being searched on the google:
bitcoin+sv ... trending upwards.
Of course, you can have your little fantasy that bcash is really bitcoin, but I doubt anyone who is bitcoin aware is going to let you get away with that bullshit, and especially in this thread. You may have to go back to r/btc for that kind of nonsense talk.
Get it into your bcash shilling head, the bcash forks are still going to be referred to as bcash..
As but one of many counterexamples: CMC.
Who gives a shit.... bcash is still bcash. It seems quite doubtful that they are going to be able to rebrand as a kind of bitcoin, so you can proclaim your fantasy all you want, it just seems like pie in the sky rather than any kind of real development with those kinds of ongoing bcash shit projects including whatever shrinking territory they are currently battling within those scam-ladden camps.
... caught up in the myth that bcash has value.
Manifestly, both branches of the Bitcoin Cash fork -- ABC and SV -- have value. Not as much as I would like, but $Billions nevertheless.
Of course, they currently have some value, and seems like the value is shrinking and going to continue to shrink, but whatever, you can buy or hodl that shit if you think that it is a good bet.. that is your choice... and really deviating into off-topicness, here except to the extent that some of the battle in that camp still seems to have some relevance to BTC prices both in terms of possible public confusion and likely whales taking advantage of such seeming ongoing public confusion - which you also like to propagate on an ongoing basis.
Do you believe that exaggeration and hyperbole makes your arguments stronger?
What do you mean? I think that I am using a sufficient amount of exaggeration and/or hyperbole in order to make various legitimate points, not to distort any facts. Fact of the matter is that bcash and its variants are shit, but they also can serve as a bitcoin attack vector, so surely it seems preferrable that they would die quickly, but I will concede that non of us bitcoin investors can really relax and forget about various aspects of bcash when there are folks involved with the project that are able to physically, fiscally, and psychologically have affects on bitcoin including propaganda bullshit, so it does not really seem to serve much purpose to give benefit of the doubt to bcash nutjobs and the shittiness of those projects, and accordingly sometimes exaggeration and hyperbole might more clearly make the proper points about those crappy projects that guys like you continue to pump (likely out of hopium and devious strong arm tactics that could get employed rather than any solid bcash fundamentals).