Of course, you would attempt to present wrong information in order to denigrate the direction of bitcoin and to imply that there is some better system - such as bitcoin forks.. such as bcash.
Is this the biggest example of a false dichotomy ever? Our only option is shitcoins vs....shitcoins? Let's pretend physical metals don't even exist because it would be totally inconvenient for shitcoins since metals perform the role of money better in every manner. What do fiat, derivatives, shitcoins, and any other type of scam you can think of all have in common? They can all be transferred effortlessly over a digital cable because...you're not actually transferring anything of value at all.
I don't know exactly roach, because there seems to be a tendency for shit coins to denigrate bitcoin and to attempt to pump their shit, just like you attempt to pump your shitty PMs....
And, ultimately, I am not sure how to rank these various assets in terms of soundness of money and a realistic and practical timeline, except that bitcoin is on top as the most sound of the monies/assets... at least under current fundamentals.
Personally, I hardly have any kind of investment in any alt coins because I consider them to be shit. There is a certain aspect of fiat that is merely practical and not bad idea to keep some money in fiat just to be able to pay bills for 6 months (and if a certain amount of cashflow and maybe all of it starts in fiat, then that is part of the calculation about what to do too)
In late 2013, when I began to buy into bitcoin - including BTC accumulation that later evolved into maintenance (and even sophisticated maintenance), I was looking for a hedge against my dollar investment - and gold never really did seem practical in terms of its storage costs, lack of divisibility and portability, and just questions regarding its supply manipulation (and potential of such). Even in 2013, I considered bitcoin to be a much better investment than gold - and it seems that subsequent developments in bitcoin and even my learning more about bitcoin, the reasons (and fundamentals of BTC) seem to be even more compelling than they were in 2013, at least in terms of soundness of money.
On the grounds of soundness of money, there does not seem to be any alt coin, asset or fiat that seems to be even close to bitcoin - and your case for ongoing pumping of gold/silver PMs has not come to make anymore sense during this time... and perhaps less sense because the Armageddon scenarios in which gold might become practical seem quite outlandishly unlikely, so in that regard, it does not seem prudent to be putting much if any assets into gold/silver.
By the way, some of the dumpy coins may have better sound money performance in the coming years as compared with gold silver and other PMs, so that would be part of the confusion about how to rank these assets (whether crypto or otherwise), because gold and silver just don't seem to fare well.. in a variety of likely scenarios... and even though in the longer run, bitcoin is likely to be the main one that really matters... but we could end up falling into a kind of 80/20 rule situation in which there would still be room for 20% of value to float around in other assets, including PMs, cryptos and fiat currencies or other instruments. Likely gold/silver would not serve a very high percent, and lucky if it were to even comprise 10% in a variety of best case scenarios for it.