Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 13129. (Read 26607389 times)

legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1520

Poor kid, can't believe he's going to spend all of his remaining lifetime in the prison just for trading between bitcoin/fiat for a little bit of commission. Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 1748
Kelly Loeffler, CEO Bakkt:
Quote
A critical element to price discovery is physical delivery. Specifically, with our solution, the buying and selling of Bitcoin is fully collateralized or pre-funded. As such, our new daily Bitcoin contract will not be traded on margin, use leverage, or serve to create a paper claim on a real asset. This supports market integrity and differentiates our effort from existing futures and crypto exchanges which allow for margin, leverage and cash settlement. Coupled with a secure, regulated warehouse solution, you can begin to see how this market infrastructure can help more institutions and consumers participate in the asset class.

https://medium.com/bakkt-blog/https-medium-com-kellyloeffler-price-discovery-f9c77885383

still need to know if they are going to use leverage within their own company
https://twitter.com/CaitlinLong_/status/1031565897167765505

Can't get on Twitter right now, but will check once I can.  It seems they are trying to dodge claims of paper Bitcoin being created by rehypothecation, - and saying 'we will do Bitcoin differently'.  I am still sceptical.  Leopard.. Spots...  

EDIT: I read Caitlin Long's points, she is asking the questions and has been a long term advocate of shares on the Blockchain to prevent things like the Dole Foods shares problem:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/21/business/dealbook/dole-case-illustrates-problems-in-shareholder-system.html
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 2282
Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist
Thanks Jbear.  I must admit with all the BCH forks flying around I am losing track of which BCH is supposed to be the real BCH.  Is it the Peter R or Alex F version or someone else’s?

You seem to be unable to discern the difference between: an instance of a blockchain; and a proposal for an instance of a client.

So is the instance of the client with OP_Group enabled the real BCH client or is the real BCH client the one without OP_Group?

Download 'em, run 'em, and see which work on the blockchain.

Oh, you can't? You won't? Not my problem.

I am fairly confident each will work on their respective blockchains.  Unless you are telling us with utmost confidence that Bcash lol won’t HF in November?
full member
Activity: 283
Merit: 127
Guys, this doesn't look pretty to me:



As the great contraindicator that you are (no offense), I would expect the market to do the exact opposite of that graph  Smiley

legendary
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1520
Guys, this doesn't look pretty to me:



Yeah.... If you draw a bunch of down arrows, and you say that the situation looks bad (or not pretty), then that is really scary. 

It feels almost as if such a negative scenario could actually happen and largely because it is stated on a chart.

Those are not just the bunch of down arrows, they are all the attempts of bulls for the short-term breakout; each and every attempt of bulls within the last week failed, and if this continues even a little, it can take us down to around ~$5750.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
This guy market buying 6k coins Cool
You mean the invisible bid wall that just ate up around 5k BTC? Very nice  Cool

 6347 6321 and 6310 were all 3000 btc walls
fwiw
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
ni ni. don't let the shitcoiners bite
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 13505
BTC + Crossfit, living life.
Mmm a dump .... So need a good quality movie before sleeping the nakend gun perfect to keep that smile on my face  Smiley
Let the recovery be BIG and take out al the bears thx and Goodnight
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 11299
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Guys, this doesn't look pretty to me:



Yeah.... If you draw a bunch of down arrows, and you say that the situation looks bad (or not pretty), then that is really scary. 

It feels almost as if such a negative scenario could actually happen and largely because it is stated on a chart.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1191
Privacy Servers. Since 2009.
Funny how before every dump we see a wave of beartrolls here spamming and posting their laughable 3k and 5k graphs. Pathetic attempt, you need to try harder!  Grin
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912
Last name: Ver

NB  I cheated by Googling it and Snoping the Google just to be sure.

jr. member
Activity: 69
Merit: 4
This guy market buying 6k coins Cool
You mean the invisible bid wall that just ate up around 5k BTC? Very nice  Cool
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
This guy market buying 6k coins Cool
sr. member
Activity: 696
Merit: 439
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
Bears putting in some work for once.
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
Thanks Jbear.  I must admit with all the BCH forks flying around I am losing track of which BCH is supposed to be the real BCH.  Is it the Peter R or Alex F version or someone else’s?

You seem to be unable to discern the difference between: an instance of a blockchain; and a proposal for an instance of a client.

So is the instance of the client with OP_Group enabled the real BCH client or is the real BCH client the one without OP_Group?

Download 'em, run 'em, and see which work on the blockchain.

Oh, you can't? You won't? Not my problem.
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 4331
Who wants to play this quizz?
Please, no googling or it s NO FUN:

Your best guess what was the last name of the 'political officer' character in the "Hunt for Red October" movie (1990).
As a reminder, this was the guy whose neck captain Ramius broke to replace the orders with his own edition and initiate the defection plan.

Reply as

Last name:  
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
@MarkFriedenbach https://twitter.com/MarkFriedenbach/status/1030211193544134658
I will be giving a talk at #ScalingBitcoin on how a block size increase up to 3600x the present size and a change of proof-of-work can be achieved with a fully backwards compatible soft-fork—old clients see all transactions and valid SHA256 block headers.

This is not good news if onchain.  I hope this is a sidechain solution.
https://twitter.com/brian_trollz/status/1030934979885322241
more discussions towards the end of this thread
legendary
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2868
Shitcoin Minimalist
‘Bitcoin Jesus’ Is Having a Hard Time Winning Over True Believers

Quote
...Bitcoin Cash payments slumped to $3.7 million in May from a high of $10.5 million in March.
Jump to: