Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 13977. (Read 26731628 times)

FTFY

Let's be on topic  

When we going to hit above $12,000?

N.S.

''Bill Gates'' want's to get in

yeahhh

he taking shit with his friend ''puppet''

to lower down the price

like a faucet.

Yeahhh

Refresh.... and check now? :p

Born in America. So I'm native American.

Its the Jews behind ALL! Yes, WWII was a Jewish construct. Nobody can become President (like Hitler) in no country of this world without the permission of Jews. Who profitted the most from WWII? The Jews and their proxy America. Do you think it would have been possible to steal a country and name it Israel without a WWII?

For sure Poland...

What country are you from?

Hitler's government was the people.

That's why I hate all Germans. Why did the German people send so many people away to extermination camps? Why German people? Why?!?

Same for Americans. Why are the American people always deciding we need war in the Middle East? Why American people?

Why do the American people keep pushing the Federal Reserve Note down our throats?

2019

I read all of that. Didn't even hurt much. Fair play.
Goodnight Bitcoinland, wherever you are.

I only mentioned that the government is composed of the people based on a seemingly impractical comment from Elwar regarding taking away guns from government and not from the people, so there seems to be some disconnection regarding what governments are, exactly.

I am not going to try to pinpoint what governments are exactly, because there is a lot of local variance, but the essence of government is supposed to be representative of the people.. so if you try to say take the guns away from government and not from people, the comment almost makes no sense, except for in some kind of irrational anti-government propaganda that tends to distort what the what the government is, which, like I said, is supposed to be representing people in a community, sense.

Regarding, why many of us are into bitcoin, that is likely going to vary too... I understand that bitcoin has a lot of libertarian origins, but that mere fact does not mean that everyone subscribes to the seemingly vacuous anti-government views of that many libertarians seem to spout out in criticizing the current system.  Sure, there are problems with the current system, but merely getting rid of government does not seem like it is going to solve as many problems as it causes.

Anyhow there can be a lot of reason why many of us believe that cryptos push in the right direction in terms of bottom-up as you say, and so we may agree on some of that, and government does not automatically mean that something is centrally planned because governments can still solve some problems that the free market might not be so good at solving.  Furthermore, we might not even need to bring politics in the discussion at all in order to see benefits in bitcoin, whether personal prosperity and/or keeping checks on some of the inflationary money printing bullshit that goes on that ends up privileging the wealthy, so bitcoin can provide some opportunities for regular people to have a price appreciating asset that is much more difficult to manipulate as compared with fiat currencies... fiat currencies and governments are not going to be going away any time soon, even though they are likely going to need to adapt to some of the crazy ass seemingly more decentralized power that comes from bitcoin... and we have never had a technology that has fit into such a niche that is so likely to cause a lot of societal changes that are difficult to know in these early days, yet in these early days, some of us that might have fewer than 10 bitcoin, might well become very prosperous through the price appreciation of bitcoin in the coming 10 years, if we are so lucky to live that long and to be able to hang onto our bitcoins.

Don't touch it, sniff it.

I don't want to make a big thing about it. It's late and I'm probably on drugs. But the idea is bottom-up, not top-down. Central planning is dangerous and not antifragile. I mean, isn't that why we're here in the first place? 

I think that I already sufficiently explained how I arrived at my tentative conclusions in this tangential topic.


There are horrible, people, too.  Much of what you are saying is relative, and subject to opinion variance.



What the fuck you talking about willis?  You give one example of one leader in history.. what does that have to do with the price of tea in china or anything else for that matter?



Get the fuck out of here, with your blasphemy.  You deserve one of these, too.       .. a baby one.


speak for yourself.  

never touch the stuff.

Governments are not the people. Nation states are horrible. Stalin could never have existed in a municipality.

Jay, stop trolling.

I think everybody is on drugs tonight. Is it?

no worries.

Whoops!!!!!


My bad.

i rarely have anything useful to contribute.

also, just so ya know, that's not an i, it's an L.

yes



ditto



How about I was going to respond in a smart-ass way, arkian, but I reflected for a few seconds and came to my senses, and largely, I agree with your proposed word change... even though we are considerably straying into OT territory.


Get a grip, peeps.

Sometimes, when I see multiple posts from me (yours truely) without any other posts in between, I begin to conclude that the rest of you peeps are slacking in your contributions to the thread.

You peeps need to pull your weight and post a bit of content, in order that I don't have so many posts that are showing up in a row....

Get a grip, vroom!!!!!! 

For your observation, you deserve one of these: