Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 14393. (Read 26710026 times)

legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
thoughts?

Depending on how that plays out I might even entertain the notion of rolling back segwit.

Huh

The MtGox bankruptcy settlement situation demonstrates one more time that The Law Is An Ass.

It is pretty well established in western law that such settlements be conducted on a cash basis. It seems the Japanese courts administering the MtGox deal will hew to this doctrine. As such, creditors will likely be 'made whole' [sic] by awarding them the Yen value of their MtGox accounts, calculated using the price of Bitcoin on the date of receivership.

Of course, BTC has appreciated exorbitantly since then. Given this, MtGox's residual BTC holdings are well in excess of its debts as calculated as per above. Indeed, the recent sale has generated enough fiat to 'make whole' [sic again] the creditors. After this, there remains ~$1.5 B USD worth of crypto in the MtGox coffers.

Again using the established legal protocols, this BTC will likely be considered the property not of MtGox creditors (i.e., after they have been 'made whole' [sic *3]), but of MtGox itself. While the picture is still cloudy, this may result in the rather perverse situation that Karpeles exits this process a very rich man.

The good news is that the required selling would seem to be over. The questionable news is the fate of the remaining funds (i.e. ~3x-4x more than sold so far) remains in limbo, and may be sold at any time, given case disposition. The Vonnegut-esqe news is that a single individual -- either corrupt, incompetent, or both, but clearly undeserving in any instance -- may end up a billionaire.

The Law Is An Ass.
legendary
Activity: 3794
Merit: 5474
sr. member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 347
For people to finally learn that price predictions are pure fine grade BS.

Or to not make investment decisions based on advice from random guys on a forum.

Take your pick  Wink


Is McAfee a random guy?

If price predictions are BS, what is the purpose of this board?
sr. member
Activity: 461
Merit: 251
I don't know - I have a hard time believing that this is a reaction to the MtGox news.  I'm more inclined to believe that there is some insider information that we'll all learn about days/weeks/months later..
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
I think that bitcoin is done...

I am still a holder Ofcourse But this is not a good sign at Well....

jr. member
Activity: 54
Merit: 1
I think that bitcoin is done...

I am still a holder Ofcourse But this is not a good sign at Well....
Bitcoin is done because of... ?
sr. member
Activity: 579
Merit: 267
I think that bitcoin is done...

I am still a holder Ofcourse But this is not a good sign at Well....
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4775
diamond-handed zealot
looks like a target of 9400
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
Anybody has a clue about what the fuck is happening?
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 2470
$120000 in 2024 Confirmed
legendary
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1037
so what the hell is going on ?
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4775
diamond-handed zealot
legendary
Activity: 3794
Merit: 5474
Cool.

This kinda feels like a big short entry/shake the tree kind of thing to me. Wonder if something big is coming?
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4775
diamond-handed zealot
did you read the link Torque?

Yes

"Whether or not this constituted a patent infringement remained a point of contention, but the issue was, to large extent, rendered moot as the Segregated Witness upgrade activated on the Bitcoin protocol in August 2017. This soft fork limited the potential upside of using the covert application of AsicBoost, and it is clear that no one ever used the overt version of AsicBoost on Bitcoin’s mainnet."

ASICboost in the defensive license could force all other mining patent holders into the agreement

Only if they so choose to join the BDPL, correct? So Bitmain would have to remove ASICboost to steer clear of the BDPL, or be forced to share any other patents they have?

As I understand it yes, so the more effective ASICboost is the better.
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
Dipping below $10,000 again by the looks of it today **Sigh**
sr. member
Activity: 546
Merit: 290
and the next dump is there ...
sr. member
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
The prices are outrageously high.

When you call my name it’s like a little prayer
The price is crashing lower, I wanna take you there
In the midnight hour, I heard someone yell white power
Just like another Shoah
You know I’ll take you there

I hear the Jews
They sound like giant rodents
I hear the Jews
I hear the Jews
boarding the trains

I close my eyes as the Dow free falls
It’s time to long Zyklon B
I wanna take you there
legendary
Activity: 3794
Merit: 5474
did you read the link Torque?

Yes

"Whether or not this constituted a patent infringement remained a point of contention, but the issue was, to large extent, rendered moot as the Segregated Witness upgrade activated on the Bitcoin protocol in August 2017. This soft fork limited the potential upside of using the covert application of AsicBoost, and it is clear that no one ever used the overt version of AsicBoost on Bitcoin’s mainnet."

ASICboost in the defensive license could force all other mining patent holders into the agreement

Only if they so choose to join the BDPL, correct? So Bitmain would have to remove ASICboost to steer clear of the BDPL, or be forced to share any other patents they have?
Jump to: