Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 14496. (Read 26608380 times)

Well, it would seem to be because you barged into a conversation where I was trying to get my accuser to clarify their accusation. We wouldn't be arguing anything at all if you had not.

BTAIM, your points all seem to come down to some magic power of consensus. Is it your assertion that any use of a coin other than that gifted with the consensus of the majority is inherently a scam? If not, I fail to see what your point is. If so, I'll just call you a petty tyrant for forcing others to conform to your desires and be on my way.

Its the goose's game..but, it pretty much says right there..

Otherwise..welcome to the Wall...now go away and make sure you bring cookies next time.

Can you insert my vote for 20/7/18?
Thanks

Which part?  Are you signing and referring to yourself, or did you have some kind of an emotional outburst that you could not contain?.

Might you NOT understand that a large portion of any battle when interacting through quasi-anonymous forums is not to lose your cool? 

The principle seems to apply in real life interactions, too... that is assuming that you are a person rather than a bot.

one satoshi might be sufficient to make you a fiat millionaire in a relatively short period of time.

Dumbass

WHAT? So much shit already arisen? Bitcoin is one and stick to it. 11500$ is a great price. But the war has only just begin

Say nothing at all.   Let newcomers figure it out. Sink or swim.  

Well, Roachie Poachie.. let me 'splain sum ting 2 u.

Wat's ever u dooo, u do NOTS wanna get's ur selfie, roachie poachied.

Udder dan dat, no muchie 'splainin can b dun nor neeeded. 

 

I agree that you should leave the whole of Adam's OP untouched.  However, I also think that it would be good if you could put your own expectations in the OP - probably before the Text of the OP of Adam...

Probably, give your short rendition of the history and when you took it over.

 You could even say something like I agree with everything that Adam said - except and then list all of the exceptions or the new guidelines that you would like to notify and maybe there would not be too many exceptions - because you do seem to have carried out the largely hands off (except for obvious trollers) tradition pretty well.  At the same time, I would hope that you would NOT get too rough on us... ... We would not want you to transform yourself into anything close to resembling a Meuh6879 - hahahahahaha..


Edit: Bitserve beat me to it, and used way fewer words, too... go figure.

wishing I had 1btc for every word JayJuanGee typed

I am not sure what is exactly going on with Tera because sometimes what happens is that the member is not sufficiently persistent in the attempt to get the account back - or let the stolen account stay in the hands of the other for too long, and thereafter it becomes more ambiguous regarding who is the original owner. 

DT members do flag accounts as stolen, that is for sure... can also hit the report button in order to attempt to get attention to moderators... but if you are not the real owner, then it becomes harder for you to prove that the account seems different.

Some kind of similar thing happened with AdamstgBit.  He was not persistent in trying to get the account back, but part of his reason was that he also became disgruntled towards forum admins, too.

Wow.  that list is getting a bit long!

I think that you have adequately answered all of the questions. so thanks for that.  I don't really believe that we need to disclose any of our specific BTC holdings in order to discuss at what levels of prices would allow us to make substantial life changes due to BTC price rises (or anticipated rises). 

Sometimes you will find me and others baiting posters into disclosing aspects of their BTC holdings and surely any of us will understand if you keep some of your specifics private.

I believe that with a large number of traditional investments, they theorize that you should be able to withdraw around 4% per year from your investment in order to maintain the principle in the long run...   It is possible that bitcoin could perform so well that it allows for higher withdrawal rate levels that would still preserve the principle - including the possibility of 10% per year withdrawals... but conservatively 4% is usually safe with a traditionally diversified portfolio of investments....

so one thing is withdrawing and maintaining the principle, and another thing is if you decide to draw down on your principle as well of course none of us will live for ever and one of the most certain things in our life is that we are going to die.. not meaning to end on a negative note.


NOT.

All 1400 coins released are valueless, imaginary tokens.  Barbarians asked for gold and silver to not sack Rome.  Under no circumstance will you ever see the US govt say to some nation:  "Hey fags, give us your shitcoins or we're launching the nukes, bitchez", because...they can just create their own new shitcoin out of thin air.  It's valueless fiat currency 2.0.

Maybe Eth will do better when it gets over $1k

ETH is one major shithole and it will not going anywhere.

ETH is NOT decentralised, ETH is NOT a world super computer. I'm wiping my ass off with diarrhea with ETH  Undecided

Rootstock will bring a real smart contract platform to Bitcoin.

BCash is a shitcoin just like all the other Bitcoin XXX....

Whilst ETC is almost at ATH already..... eth/etc flippening?

That means btc will go to .01Cents

Its probably the j3wz